In fact, in the end, people with different positions are bound to have a certain misunderstanding, and to a certain extent, they understand that it is the inevitable result of the convergence of levels, just like the collision between atoms. Pen | fun | pavilion www. ｂｉｑｕｇｅ。 When this collision rises to the two groups of doctors and patients, it will have all kinds of serious consequences, as exemplified by the current medical troubles. And when our understanding rises to a certain level, it is not from a simple attitude of likes and dislikes, and it cannot be simply divided, because this is the initial stage, and our cognition is dominated by feelings, which will cause simple antagonism, which will cause conflicts, and will be useless for solving problems. At a higher level, it is understood that positions and interests are more tolerant and understanding when a person matures to a certain extent, he tends to consider the measures that different people will have to take because of their positions. At first, I thought that as long as there was enough communication and mutual understanding, people with different positions could sit down and communicate with each other. As long as the degree of information asymmetry is reduced, mutual understanding will be smoother; But a venerable female doctor who has been through enough ups and downs has made it clear that people with different positions cannot understand each other, because conflicts of interest are inevitable. All we can do is to watch, because different groups will spontaneously engage in a certain game, and ideally eventually reach a Nash equilibrium: neither side can maximize each other's interests, or even the interests of the whole, but can only reach a stable state: neither can obtain greater benefits by changing their behavior. This is the modern interpretation of class struggle, we are divided into certain groups according to certain interests and needs, and we are bound to compete with other groups, and the final result is the result of the competition game of their respective groups, which is the Nash equilibrium. Each group must resolutely defend the interests of its own group, and any problems that arise in the process are all manifestations of this struggle, and in fact, medical troubles are struggles of this nature. And the achievement of equilibrium is like a spring, if you are weak, it will be strong, so both sides with different positions must fight brutally. At this time, if you are one side of the struggle for interests, you are bound to safeguard your own interests, and if you are not on both sides of the struggle, then you are not qualified to point fingers at the struggle. Even if there are sympathizers in each camp, it will not change the struggle between the two sides. This is an inevitable consequence, and at the same time the emergence of sympathizers is also an inevitable consequence, and the various hybridities of this situation are a manifestation of a mature society, and you can also think of it as a model of a Taiji diagram, of course, my understanding is that it tends to resist change in favor of the original change.

Then it is not advisable to simply evaluate a thing, the information we have, the position we are in, the angle from which we observe things, etc., determine the impact of this thing on us, and then show a certain attitude is our view of a thing, and the result of this process may become very different from the essence of the matter. Therefore, all the arguments we have are not so much a conflict of interests, but a debate about a whole set of values and outlook on life behind each person. This is reflected in the fact that when thinking about problems from the other party's standpoint, they will always feel excusable, that is, the person who hates must have pity; Of course, on the other hand, it is also true that the poor must have something to hate. Therefore, it is impossible to get involved in such a battle of positions and to reach a consensus. Adults have always said that life is the art of compromise, and this is a clear proof of this. The reason why everyone is so disgusted with medical troubles now is because at a larger level, people have a greater sense of identity and understanding, which is the inevitable result of social progress, and this is a higher level of interests, which can naturally easily crush the interests of medical troublemakers. It is also for this reason that the current stage of medical troubles will inevitably withdraw from the stage of history. However, as the conflict of interests exists, all kinds of alternative "medical troubles" fighting for their own interests will arise one after another, and they will never disappear. From a macro point of view, this is bound to happen, we don't have to make any macro judgments, there is no need: you say it or not, it is there, it does not increase or decrease.

The above is at a macro level, and it is not very important for ordinary individuals to pay attention to it. Because once implemented at the individual level, nature has evolved a set of mechanisms: each individual tends to find a local optimal solution. The trade-offs and judgments made according to the information held by the individual, the choice is what they think is the most suitable for themselves (of course, the accuracy is debatable, after all, the information mastered by the individual is limited, and at the same time, there are individuals who have the overall information to make the global optimal solution, and the distribution of these two types of individuals in the population is distributed according to the power law: the more information they have, the fewer the number of individuals). At the same time, due to the existence of the environment, it is natural to make choices, that is, to screen individuals with different choices, and only those who are really in line with the overall optimal can survive, and eliminate those who do not meet the overall optimal local optimum, so that the individuals who can survive have certain characteristics, and maintain the interests of the whole (the continuation of the survival of the whole is the greatest interest, and the abandonment of a small part is inevitable): who said that medical troubles are not made out of the consideration of maximizing their own interests and making certain choices? But its inevitable demise is also inevitable.

result: Through different stages of cognition, the essence of which is the change of the degree of information mastery, our ideas will have a certain progress and evolution. Through the introduction of several stages of cognition, this article can help people understand the current stage they are in, so as to understand the current doctor-patient relationship more rationally. It's a way to get out of a single mindset, and that's to stay in awe, to know that what you know is lacking, and to have a clearer picture of the current doctor-patient relationship. Because people's arrogance comes from ignorance, telling them that other people's thoughts at different stages can carry out a certain amount of reflection on their own ideas (the number of people who can have this quality is still small, which is related to the education level of the society as a whole), knowing that their thoughts are not the kind of incisive views that hit the nail on the head, but the ideas that people who are at the forefront of the times have long abandoned, people may be more humble and easier to listen to other people's opinions, that is, the battle of positions, the conflict of interests is inevitable, and we can think beyond this level, to avoid falling into the mistakes of predecessors. At the same time, it is understandable that when the situation comes, people may make choices that are different from their previous beliefs (it is also possible for a person who denounces medical troubles on the Internet to become a doctor at the instigation of a loved one), which is the limitation of the individual, and his behavior is the result of maximizing his own interests. It's a group unconscious, and the more people who think independently, the less this happens. But as we said earlier, the distribution of these two types of individuals in the population is according to the power law: the more information there is, the fewer the number of individuals. A small number of people do not affect the whole, and the only thing that can be done is not to follow the crowd, which can sometimes be seen as a resistance to change in the physical sense.

;