According to Zhihu's article, China is now catching up with and surpassing the United States in all aspects; In this case, can we lead the world trend in terms of intellectual property rights and world cultural thought?

The window for the catharsis of nationalist sentiments, the movie already has "Wolf Warrior", and all kinds of glory for the country. The US imperialists are also now, and they are constantly talking about various threats, making it look like they are scared to death.

Now, can you look at the problem a little deeper? Don't be in a so-called "world of cultivating immortals" where the weak are strong, I was born to be jealous of the strong and bullied by the unkindness of heaven and earth, so in the end, I want to become the great master (demon king), dominating the life and death of all things, from proletarians to fascist leaders, from extreme inferiority to extreme conceit.

If we want to continue to develop as a countryman (this country), this kind of negative emotions that are extremely inferior to extreme conceit and need to be comforted in our hearts can be completely put to rest.

Can't we think more about how to live in peace with this demon king (American imperialism); Discuss how powerful the Demon King is, how he made mistakes and was overtaken, and what the ultimate Demon King is pursuing. What is the ultimate pursuit of our hearts and minds?

Is it better to replace the demon king, become the next big demon king, and repeat the mistakes of the demon king; Even arrogant and inflated, in the end, even the current demon king can't play the ending?

After more than 30 years of reform and opening-up, China's strength has grown rapidly, far exceeding Deng Gong's expectations. Let's start with some comparisons: China just finished refueling satellites in orbit in 2016, and there was no news at all. And the United States announced this scientific research project in 2008 in a high-profile manner, and in 2014 announced ground tests and space tests, and then there was no more. With the urine nature of the Americans, if you don't publicize it, it will definitely fail. China's land-based mid-course anti-missile tests (the most technically demanding anti-missile method) have been successful 6 out of 7; The same experiment in the United States was successful in 1 out of 4. Two neural computing chips have come out in China, one of which has been commercialized on a large scale. There is only one professor in the United States who has come up with one, and it is still in the stage of mouth cannons, and it is commercial, who is willing to wait for whom, to ensure that it is conducive to cultivating the mind. How many Chinese planes are being tested and ready to be installed, not military fans can't remember, and many of them are world-leading in performance. And the F35 in the United States, in the words of US Republican Senator McCain, "has become a tragedy and a scandal." In terms of communication technology, China's ZTE and Huawei are aggressive in 5G technology, and the United States has no choice but to recruit these two Chinese companies outside the market in order not to work for China in the 5G generation. China has launched a quantum communication satellite, and quantum communication has seen the dawn of commercial use, but the United States is still paying lip service. China's supercomputer "Shenwei-Taihu Light" not only has computing power far from all supercomputers in the United States, but also throws off the United States supercomputing a few streets in terms of energy consumption, and such achievements are still based on 64 nanometers such an old antique process technology, if China is not embargoed by the Wassenaar Treaty, like South Korea, it can import finishing technology, using the most advanced 14 nanometer process technology, it has to throw off the distance of several galaxies in the United States. The United States' "one hour all over the world" system (hypersonic vehicle) has failed every test, but China's first test has been successful. More than 10 years ago, it was reported that the United States overspent on military scientific research by an average of 2.5 times and delayed it by an average of 1.8 years. So far, just look at the DDG1000 of the American "science fiction warships": 33 ships were DDG1000 to be produced in the budget, and now the money is about to be spent, and it is expected that only 3 ships will be produced at most, which is 10 times overrun. Moreover, the first ship will be returned to the factory for overhaul three months after it is launched, and it is really doubtful whether that thing has combat effectiveness. Comparison of the industrial economy of China and the United States: China's manufacturing industry accounts for 36.9% of GDP, while the United States accounts for only 12.4% and 78.1% of the proportion is the service industry. In 2010, China surpassed the United States to become the world's largest manufacturing country. From 1895 to 2009, the United States has been sitting firmly on the "throne" of the world's first manufacturing industry for 114 years, and China's manufacturing industry not only surpasses the United States in terms of output value, but also is almost equal to the sum of the three countries of the United States, Japan and Germany, which is 13 times that of Russia! Let's take a look at a set of world ranking data that China has made foreigners jaw-dropping in 2013: pig iron production ranks first in the world, accounting for 59% of the world's total output; Coal production ranks first in the world, accounting for half of the world's total production; Crude steel production ranks first in the world, accounting for 46.3% of global output, more than the sum of the 2nd to 20th places; The scale of shipbuilding ranks first in the world, accounting for 41% of the world's total shipbuilding; Cement production ranks first in the world, accounting for more than 60% of the world's total output; The output of electrolytic aluminum ranks first in the world, accounting for more than 65% of the world's total output; Fertilizer production ranks first in the world, accounting for 35% of the world's total output; The chemical fiber industry ranks first in the world, accounting for 70% of the world's total output; The output of flat glass ranks first in the world, accounting for more than 50% of the world's total output; The sales scale of construction machinery ranks first in the world, accounting for 43% of the world's total; Automobile manufacturing ranks first in the world, and continues to rank first in the world, accounting for 25% of the world's total output; The output of color TVs ranks first in the world, accounting for 48.8% of global shipments; The production of mobile phones ranks first in the world, accounting for 70.6% of global shipments; The output of integrated circuits ranks first in the world, accounting for 90.6% of global shipments; The scale of import and export trade ranks first in the world, and it is the world's largest import and export trading country; The list may be as long as many people expect, and there are also - the world's largest producer of textiles, supplying four pieces of clothing per person in the world every year; The world's largest shoe production, 3 pairs per person in the world every year; The world's largest power generation; The world's largest refrigerator output; The world's largest DVD production; The world's largest air conditioning output; The world's largest cotton production; The world's largest edible oil production; The world's largest motorcycle production; The scale of phosphorus production is the largest in the world; The world's largest furniture export scale; The scale of piano production and sales ranks first in the world; The world's largest grain production and consumption; The world's largest meat production and consumption scale; the world's largest fish production and consumption; …… These data are only China in 2013, and to this day, the gap between the second and third places and China is still widening. In terms of the efficiency and scale of infrastructure construction, China is unique in the world - highways, the world's first; high-speed rail, the world's first; Metro, the first in the world; water transport, the first in the world; port, the first in the world; The tunnel is the first in the world, with a total mileage of more than one week around the earth's equator, and ranks first in the world in terms of scale and construction speed; water conservancy construction, the world's first; The power grid, the first in the world and the best power grid, is not one of the only countries in the world that actually applies UHV transmission technology. Developed countries from the sixties and seventies of the last century began the early research of UHV transmission, after decades, has not yet formed a mature equipment, even the United States power grid system is old due to lack of funds, often caused by bad weather caused by large-scale power outages and slow recovery, and China just started at the beginning of this year and is currently the world's highest voltage level, the largest transmission capacity, the farthest transmission distance, the most advanced technical level of UHV transmission project, the design power can light up 400 million 30 watt lights. By the way, let's take a look at the infrastructure list in the United States: this is actually not surprising, just like the New York subway, dozens of people die every year, but there is no security door installed, and the New York City government's reply to the relevant proposal is also concise: "No money!" "—A lot of money has to be given to the Pentagon to contain China. In terms of the Internet, as of the latest data in 2015, China's mobile communication users reached 1.293 billion, mobile Internet users reached 890 million, such a scale of the market has driven the rapid development of China's telecommunications industry, Huawei has not only become the world's largest giant, its leading telecommunications standards in the World Telecommunications Congress voted to defeat the United States standards, become a new international standard. In the last 2014 China-US-India major socio-economic indicator chart (some of which are 12 or 13 years of data), China's economic scale is already recognized as the second largest in the world, as long as the pace of progress is not interrupted, it is only a matter of time before it surpasses the United States to become the world's largest economy, and this generation of Chinese will basically see that day. Some people say that China's economy is supported by a real estate bubble, in fact, the impact of real estate on China is not as big as the media has been shocked all day long, the proportion of real estate in the United States is 12.3% of GDP, China only accounts for 5.6% (2012), the proportion of expansion in recent years is still extremely limited, and the proportion of real estate in China's GDP in 2015 is only 6.1%. The bulk of China's economy is still dominated by manufacturing, a diagram illustrates that there is no doubt about this, as can be seen from electricity consumption. China has long surpassed the United States in terms of electricity generation. In 2011, China's industrial electricity consumption was 3.463 trillion kWh, compared to 0.976 trillion kWh in the United States, and 3.55 times that of China. From 1992 to 2012, industrial electricity consumption in the United States hovered around 1 trillion kilowatt-hours for 20 consecutive years, while China's industrial electricity consumption expanded about six-fold to 3.606 trillion kilowatt-hours in 2012. Today, China's industrial industry has reached a level of breadth and height that was unimaginable in the past. China has 39 industrial categories, 191 medium categories and 525 sub-categories, and is the only country in the world that has all the industrial categories in the United Nations Industrial Classification, thus forming a unique and complete industrial system, which can produce all industrial products from clothing, footwear and socks to aerospace, from raw materials and minerals to industrial machine tools, which has become an important source of China's competitiveness and the necessary foundation and driving force for further upgrading the industry; Some people will make a joke that China can not make a ballpoint pen refill, in fact, this is more just a market problem, at the beginning of the year the Premier of the State Council briefly mentioned this matter, half a year later our country will solve this technology, not only began to meet domestic demand, its high-end products ceramic pen beads even in just a few months began to become the first choice of foreign brand-name ballpoint pens. It can be said that there are only technologies that China does not want to conquer, and there are no areas that China cannot overcome. In the past, it was always said that China's industry is big but not strong, and this impression is not unreasonable, because we used to mainly introduce imitations. Whether it is strong or not is actually a question of scientific and technological strength, below, Second, science and technology For a long time, some people have insisted that scientific research institutes are all cheating funds and engaging in corruption and do not do practical things, well, and then these people launched the space station into the sky...... It is still dry goods, taking the United States, which ranks first in global scientific and technological strength, as a reference. At present, China is ahead of the United States in the fields of household appliances, building materials, railway and high-speed rail technology, wind turbines and power equipment, solar panels and oil and gas equipment, but more than 20 other technical fields are inferior to the United States, and the gap with the United States in the technical fields of commercial aircraft, semiconductors, biological machines, special chemicals and system software is about 20 to 30 years. In 2015, among the world's 100 hot scientific research frontiers and 49 emerging frontier fields, the United States has core papers selected in 143 frontier fields, and the number of core papers in 108 frontiers ranks first, China has core papers selected in 82 frontiers, and the number of core papers in 16 frontiers is the first. Therefore, a basic fact is that the United States is still the world's number one scientific and technological power. But China is closing the gap at an ever-increasing pace. Some people say, come on, let's surpass Japanese technology first. According to the 2015 Asian Economic Integration Report released by the Asian Development Bank, China's share of Asia's high-end technology exports rose from 9.4% in 2000 to 43.7% in 2014, ranking first in Asia. Japan's share fell from 25.5% in 2000 to 7.7% in 2014. In fact, China has become the dominant force in Asia's exports of high-end technology products, and Japan is only a fraction of China's. In the circle of friends, from time to time, some people post some articles lamenting the miraculous level of German science and technology, which seems to be difficult for China to match, so what is the truth? We speak with the internationally recognized FC index (Nature Index), which is the most important measure of a country's scientific and technological strength. The statistics for the year released in December 2014 were: FC in the United States ranked first with 18,643, China ranked second with 5,206, Germany ranked third with 4,077, and the fourth to tenth places were Japan, the United Kingdom, France, Canada, Spain, Switzerland, and South Korea, from 3,371 to 1,151, and Russia was not in the top ten. It can be seen that the United States is still very strong, FC is 3.6 times that of China, but China is already the second largest in the world, reaching 1.3 times that of Germany and 1.5 times that of Japan. This may come as a surprise to China collapse theorists, but it is not surprising to those in the international research community. Just over a decade ago, China's world-class scientific research papers were rare, and many professors never published them. Since the beginning of the 21st century, the quantity and quality of China's scientific and technological papers have exploded, and the upward momentum is shocking. In terms of the comparison between FC in 2014 and 2013, the United States fell by 0.8%, Germany increased by 1.0%, Japan fell by 2.3%, the United Kingdom increased by 0.9%, and then France, Canada, Spain, Switzerland, and South Korea, which were in the sixth to tenth places, all declined. What about China? Up 14.9%! From June 2014 to May 2015, exactly half a year has passed compared to December 2014. In just half a year, China's FC has changed from 5026 to 6318, an increase of 25.7%! At the same time, FC in the United States changed from 18,643 to 17,448, a decrease of 6.4%; Germany went from 4,077 to 3,939, down 3.4%. In just six months, the U.S. ratio to China shrank from 3.6 to 2.8, and China's ratio to Germany expanded from 1.3 to 1.6. It may take more time for China to surpass the United States in terms of technological prowess than many people think! What the? Russia, you say? Russia is in 19th place, and China is 18.7 times larger. In addition to FC, let's look at the patent situation. According to the statistics of the world's five major intellectual property offices (the European Patent Office, the Japan Patent Office, the Korean Intellectual Property Office, the State Intellectual Property Office of China and the United States Patent and Trademark Office), in 2014, a total of 955,400 invention patents were granted by the five major bureaus, with the United States the most, 301,000, accounting for 31%, followed by China, with 233,000, but its growth rate was the fastest, reaching 12.3%, and the growth rates of the United States, Japan, South Korea and Europe were 8.2%, -18.0%, 1.9% and -3.1% respectively. Let's look at the investment of manpower in scientific research. In 2013, the total number of research and development (R&D) personnel in China was 3.533 million, surpassing the United States and ranking first in the world. What about the funding? In 2014, China's R&D expenditure was 1,331.2 billion yuan, an increase of 12.4% over 2013. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) predicts in its OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2014 that China's R&D spending will surpass that of the European Union and the United States around 2019 to become the world's largest R&D expenditure. It can be said that China is the only country in the world that can compete with the United States in almost all fields and have offensive and defensive aspects. Other Western countries have basically given up on fourth-generation machines, search engines, e-commerce, social media, smartphones and other fields due to lack of strength. Japan, a tech powerhouse that some people are craving, has given up even more, along with telecommunications standards, navigation systems, large airplanes, and so on. As for Russia, with the exception of the military industry and aerospace, most areas have withdrawn from the competition. Only China is in full swing, and all areas of science and technology are not absent. When it comes to the military, we have to talk about the military. In the past history, I will not mention the counterattack against Vietnam and India, but only look at the present. Overall, the military gap between China and the United States is significant, but China's approach is surprisingly fast and has one of the highest potential. The Global Combat Power Ranking (GFP) of the Global Military Power Index, released this year, is an important measure of the military power of the world's major countries, which has been untouched for many years - the United States, Russia and China continue to rank in the top three of the world's major military powers. Let's feel it on two tables first: But here, we focus on not how many aircraft, tanks, and artillery China currently has, those can be checked on the Internet casually, here, we focus on China's military potential. Suffice it to say that China's military potential is not only much higher than that of Russia, but even higher than that of the United States. China has the most comprehensive and powerful industrial capacity in the world. Taking fighters as an example, Russia's "Military Courier" reported that China's annual fighter production has exceeded the total of 28 NATO countries, and at the same time, in the mass production of J-11B, J-15, J-16, J-10, JF-17, J-7, H-6M/K, K-8 and L-15, the annual output is enough to ensure the equipment of two aviation divisions. "In the competition with the United States and Russia, especially Russia, China, with its huge production capacity and rapid scientific and technological development, has achieved a one-sided victory," the newspaper said. Taking shipbuilding as an example, China only needs to use 1% of its shipbuilding capacity for military production, and it can achieve "equipping a fleet, launching a fleet, and starting a fleet a year." Currently, there are 38 docks in China with a length of more than 304.5 meters and a width of more than 75 meters. Even according to the dimensions of the American "Ford" class aircraft carriers (333 meters in total length and 77 meters in maximum width), there are 34 Chinese dockyards that exceed the "Ford" class in length and width. In other words, if we do not consider other factors and only consider the limitations of the dock, if China's shipbuilding industry is now going all out to build aircraft carriers, we can see more than 30 "Ford" class aircraft carriers being built in the dock at the same time! And now only the Newport News shipyard in the United States has the ability to create aircraft carriers of the "Ford" class tonnage. From the perspective of world history, economic power will inevitably rise in science and technology, and the logic of reality is so simple and crude. Even under the arms embargo imposed by the West, China's military science and technology have made rapid progress in recent years. For example, hypersonic missiles, China has successfully launched and tested seven times so far, and the United States has succeeded several times? In addition to the J20J31 stealth fighter, the Sword stealth unmanned fighter, the Y-20 large transport aircraft, the Air Police 2000 large early warning aircraft, the 001A aircraft carrier, the 094093 nuclear submarine, the 052D Aegis destroyer, the 054A frigate, the DF31ADF41 strategic missile, the Type 99G main battle tank, the mid-course anti-missile, anti-satellite, laser weapons, and other advanced weapons and equipment corresponding to the United States, China has also developed killer weapons such as DF26DF21D anti-ship ballistic missiles. China's J20 stealth fighter jet is in small batch production, while the American F35 is still problematic to this day, forcing the United States to prepare to reopen the F22 production line. But Loma has offered a sky-high price for this, and it is not known whether the United States, with its stretched financial situation, can afford this huge expenditure. The war was fought against comprehensive national strength, especially the strength of the manufacturing industry, which has a direct impact on military production. China's military spending accounts for only 3.3 percent of manufacturing, while the United States already accounts for 32.4 percent of manufacturing. It can be said that with the scale of the U.S. manufacturing industry, the current U.S. military spending has reached the limit, while China has already made the world's largest output of fighter planes and warships with less than 1.5% of its GDP. If, like the United States and Russia, military spending is raised to 4% of GDP, who will be able to start an arms race with China? The most intuitive part of the competition for the total retail sales of consumer goods to stimulate domestic demand is that the people buy things, is China really low? The total retail sales of consumer goods (i.e., the part of household consumption of goods) accounted for 35.3% of GDP in 2008. However, this is only a part of the internationally accepted calculation of the proportion of consumption, and not the entire proportion of consumption in GDP. According to the statistics of the U.S. Department of Commerce, the total retail sales of consumer goods in the United States in 2008 was 4.48 trillion US dollars, and the GDP of the United States was 14.36 trillion US dollars, so the proportion of consumption in the United States in 2008 was only 31.1%! Is it 35.3% higher in China, or 31.1% higher in the United States?! That, of course, is higher in China. This shows that the Chinese people have stronger domestic demand and greater purchasing power to buy things. China's total retail sales of consumer goods (SR) are growing at a double-digit rate every year. Over the past decade, China's GDP growth has been higher than China's, much larger than that of the United States, and its share of GDP is also larger than that of the United States. To a certain extent, it can also be seen that China has a more equal distribution of wealth than the United States, and ordinary people have a stronger ability to consume goods. Some people ask, in 2008, the United States just experienced a financial tsunami, is the proportion of consumption a little low? Let's take a look at the retail consumption of goods in recent years, the United States is still inferior to China: the proportion of total retail sales of consumer goods in GDP was 36.8% in 2009, 39.4% in 2010, and 38.3% in 2011; In the United States, it was only 29% (4.09/14.12) in 2009, 29.8% (4.36/14.62) in 2010, and 31.3% (4.7/15) in 2011 (the units of the figures in parentheses are all trillion dollars). The proportion is really not high. In 2012, China's total retail sales of consumer goods exceeded 20 trillion yuan, reaching 207167 billion yuan, a nominal increase of 14.3% over the previous year (real growth of 12.1% after deducting price factors), which was once again much higher than the GDP growth rate, and the proportion of China's total retail sales of consumer goods in GDP exceeded 40% for the first time. And the U.S. is still hovering at a low level of around 32%. In absolute terms, China's total retail sales of consumer goods have caught up with two-thirds of the United States, which is much smaller than the absolute gap between China's official GDP statistics and the GDP of the United States. The strength of China's domestic demand is clearly far greater than the "general view" suggests. Automobile consumption GDP2016 Chinese average GDP8000 more than US dollars, which is converted according to the exchange rate. But this data is obviously too different from the actual situation, I calculate China's new car sales per 10,000 people in 2016 according to the statistics of automobile consumption, and compare with some countries (regions) in the world, the results are as follows: country (region) + 2016 new car sales + population + new car sales per 10,000 people in the United States ------ 17.75 million --- 320 million ---- 554.7 / 10,000 people in Canada---- 1.95 million ---- 35.54 million --- 548.7 / 10,000 people------ 3.35 million ---- 81 million --- 413.6 per 10,000 people, 2.01 million ---- ------ 65 million --- 307.7 per 10,000 people------, 2.7 million ---- 64.51 million --- 418.5 per 10,000 people, 4.97 million ------ ---- 126 million ---394.4 / 10,000 people------ South Korea 1.59 million ---- 50.42 million ---315.3 million vehicles per 10,000 people Chinese mainland --28 million units--- 1.35 billion ---207.4 million vehicles per 10,000 people, Taiwan, China - 439,000 units--- 23 million --- 1.911 million vehicles per 10,000 people, Brazilian ------ 2.05 million units---- 202 million --- 1.015 million vehicles per 10,000 people, Russian ---- 1.43 million units---- 144 million ---100 units/ According to the data, the number of new cars sold per 10,000 people, multiplied by 100, is almost the per capita GDP of the country (region) in US dollars. Only China is strange, 8,000 US dollars per capita, which should correspond to 100 new car sales for 100,000 people. Chinese mainland's 207 new car sales per 10,000 people have exceeded Taiwan Province's 191, so the per capita GDP should correspond to 20,000 US dollars. It seems that China's GDP is underestimated.