This single chapter,I was going to send it after signing the contract or before it was put on the shelves.,But yesterday there was a lot of feedback on the single owner.,Just send it in advance.,By the way, let's talk about this book.。

Before we start talking, please allow the bell to express his attitude first-

"This book, from the creativity, the protagonist, to the plot, the scene, is really [the story of the online reader's own story], and it also has the intention of paying tribute to the single owner, if everyone ignores the quality of the book because of the appearance of the real ID, the reader actually does not support the characters created by the bookworm as the prototype, and the single master does not support the book list creative such a work, which is really worrying!(These two chapters have dropped several collections, 555)"

Of course,The bell is not to be used by online readers、The collective sense of honor of the single owner of the book list is wrapped in everyone,I just hope that everyone will put aside the real ID,If you think this book is good,Or it's worth waiting and seeing,Please consider adding a book list,Readers consider collecting and voting for it,After all, this is the first book of the bell.,I really hope to go a little better;If you think it's a piece of garbage.,Just go away.,Or put forward pertinent criticism suggestions.,The bell will also be very grateful.。

Okay, let's get down to business!!

[First question, why did Bell write this book?]

Everyone should still remember that when we were children, we read books and watched TV, and saw "Ma Liang", "Wow, if only I had a magic pen", and saw "Journey to the West", "Wow, I really want a golden hoop stick", and then bigger, look at Jin Guliang Wenhuang, "If you can be Xiao Feng Yang Chu Liuxiang, you will die without regrets", and later chased the Internet article, what Xiao Xun'er Long Aotian ......

Bell has been reading online articles for many years, and has always wanted to write a book that can fulfill these wishes, but there has never been a creative idea that makes people shine, can both justify themselves and make people have a sense of authenticity and immersion, until one day, Bell's good friend "Forget the world" suddenly said that he has a "thought of becoming a god!".

I'm really grateful to Forget, the original idea of this book was his, very genius, and it also met the needs of the bell, so I wanted to write it as soon as I heard it, and I wanted to write it, although I was reluctant, but because I had another book in my hand, and second, I was going to go to the field to take charge of a project, and I didn't have much time to code words (because of this, his book was also a eunuch in a few days, and I despised it), and finally gave me the idea.

[This brings us to the second question, why does there be a real single master ID?]

According to Wangshi, this is the idea that he went to "Yang Chenkong" to push the book, dived in the comment area for a week, and suddenly surfaced after a few days of talking nonsense with everyone, so I must thank you for it, if you can reproduce the scene, it would be the best, this is the origin of the content of the last two chapters, and the real IDs that appear are also the IDs that often appear in Yang Chenkong's comment area.

It should be noted that Miss Kongkong's book list is certainly well maintained, but in Bell's view, taking care of the book list carefully, especially the single owner who is willing to explore niche high-quality works and help newcomers are the "cutest people", the readers of this book are online readers, and the object of tribute is a single main group, not a specific single master.

I still remember that on the first day of the book, the bell went to Yang Chenkong's comment area to greet everyone, but he said at the time: "The real ID is too embarrassing, forgive me, I won't go to see it", and at the same time, a few single owners said that there was an embarrassment of acquaintance ID honey, and they were so depressed at the time (because the single owners of the comment area would at least politely say that they would test the poison, but because of the ID, they were rejected directly, you can substitute it, you invite a bunch of people to come to the house in public, saying that the wine is in the pot, The dish has been cooked, but one of the guys replied, "I'm not going to your house", and a bunch of unconscionable guys on the side also coaxed, "It's just that", that kind of mood...... At that time, the bell already felt that it might not be beneficial to use a real ID, but still insisted on doing it.

In fact, the scene reproduction is the most difficult, because you can't make up your identity and make up the plot like other friendship actors, but you must restore it realistically. Some of the dialogues in these two chapters are the original words that have been intercepted for a long time in the book review area, and some are processed by studying the book list descriptions of the single masters.

It's so thankless, why does Bell do it?

There is no other reason, a book related to the book list and containing the intention of tribute, among which there is actually a real book list and a real single master, just like a mountaineer who doesn't know that there is Mount Hua and doesn't know that there is Mount Everest, like words? (Suppose, this book uses a false ID, and there is no ghostly feather, it is estimated that it will be slapped in the face by the reader: "What the hell, there is no ghostly feather in the book list? The bell is too ignorant of conscience!")

So,Follow-up content,There may be some other single main and reader IDs,But in view of everyone's reaction,If it is not necessary to bell to strive to write less,The dialogue content of these two chapters will also appear less,But if necessary,Bell will still try to use the real ID (how do you feel that you are not afraid of death when you know that there are tigers in the mountains and are biased towards the tigers!^_^).

Actually, I don't understand why it's embarrassing, the bell just wants to leave a small interesting stroke on the online article, to be an artistic processing recorder, just like we took a lot of photos with friends when we traveled, some of them are as beautiful as fairies, and some of them are not good, but after a long time, everyone looks back, whether it is beautiful or two strokes in the end, but they are all smiling.

Whether you are writing or reading a book, having fun is the most important thing!

[The third question, involving other works, why does the bell use the real title, real author, and real prop writing method?]

Mu Mu raised this question a few days ago, and he was worried that it would cause unnecessary trouble, so let's take this opportunity to explain.

First of all, making up some parallel worlds, work names, and virtual props is not a hassle for the bell, and it can save a lot of time and energy, but this is contrary to the original intention of creativity, and it seems to be very inconsistent.

Of course, there is also the practice of chicken thieves, changing the name, which can not only let the reader know which book it is, but also avoid trouble, such as "Changing the Night" to "Heaven Will Be Night", "I'm a Big Star" to "I'm a Superstar", "Catty" to "Greasy", "Tasting Oracle" to "Water Oracle", and Archive Crystal to Countercurrent Ore...... And so on, but this kind of behavior of covering your ears and stealing the bell is really naïve and ridiculous, and the concubine really can't do it.

Secondly, the information and related props of other works appear in this book, which is equivalent to alternative advertisements and recommendations, which is a mutually beneficial thing, especially in the case of good grades, readers will not just read one book, I believe that the author with a little vision should not be entangled in this matter.

Of course, etiquette should indeed say hello, but because of time and energy, the bell can't be contacted, communicated, and waited for a reply by the author, if there are readers who have to be entangled in this issue, the bell can only play tricks: "You have read so many works of Zhailiu and Journey to the West, has the author said hello to Pu Songling and Wu Chengen?" (^_^)

As a writer, Bell knows that it is not easy to create. Therefore, no matter what form it takes, whenever the work that appears in this book will definitely indicate the source (the title and the original author), if it involves evaluation, good evaluation will also take this approach, and negative evaluation will make appropriate changes to the title and author, so that ordinary readers other than the old bookworm can not see it at all (as for the single owner and the old bookworms have evidence to prove that the works were copied unscrupulously and brushed unscrupulously, the authors must be careful, "I come from the book list" It's the mudslide in the online article, maybe one day it will wash away the rocks and mud, revealing your true colors).

In particular, for the works that appear in this book, those books with good quality but not popular are equivalent to friendly recommendations (if you can also give the bell a recommendation in any form, it would be better, haha), as for those popular books, the bell rubbed your popularity, and also said thank you in advance, if the author really does not want the bell to mention your work, appear in your props and mention and appear, please leave a message in the book review area or send a private message to the bell, I will revise it as soon as possible.

In addition, if there are texts that involve some personal tastes and appreciation levels, such as the evaluation of the works of the great gods is lower than the evaluation of the works of newcomers, etc., please don't ask why, and don't pull the camp to scold each other. ^_^

[The third question will lead to the fourth question, what controversy may the book have in the future?]

This point,Bell thought about it seriously before writing,Because stick to the third point,It's just that the book doesn't get good grades.,If you have a little achievement,It will definitely cause controversy.,It may even attract "theft","Plagiarism" and other attacks.,Bell has also seen a lot of excellent online articles.,That's how it died.。

Although the online article is mainly for entertainment, I hope that the readers of this book are all babies with basically sound minds and independent judgments. Of course, with the increasing number of readers, it is inevitable that some people with incomplete minds or other intentions will be mixed in, so as to popularize the concepts of originality, following the trend, imitation, misappropriation, and plagiarism in advance, so as to save long-winded in the future.

A friend who is engaged in intellectual property legal work once used a paper to give the bell an analogy -

For example, if you wrote an article entitled "On the Role of Personal Cultivation in the Construction of Spiritual Civilization," no one has ever written a treatise on personal cultivation before, and this is completely original and should be vigorously advocated.

Then someone wrote an article "On the Eight Aspects of Personal Cultivation Can Promote Social Construction", one of which may be to promote spiritual civilization, although this is the subject matter to follow the trend, but the content is original and worthy of encouragement.

Then someone wrote an article "On Several Important Characteristics of Personal Cultivation to Promote the Construction of Spiritual Civilization", the meaning of the expression may be similar to yours, but although the starting point, logic, arguments, and expressions are slightly similar, most of them are different, this is called imitation, which is acceptable but not encouraged.

Then someone wrote an article "On the Fluctuating Relationship between Personal Income and GDP", which is a completely different paper, but because it involves the dialectical relationship between income, personal cultivation, and the overall civilization of society, he cites some of your views, data, and materials.

However, if he marks the source, explains the source, and the proportion of citations is very small, then it is completely original and no different from your originality, and it is also worth vigorously advocating.

Then someone wrote an article "On the Improvement of the Personal Cultivation of the Whole People Can Promote the Construction of Spiritual Civilization", and quoted your views, arguments or words in large paragraphs, or broke up and reorganized the above articles, and changed them into a new paper, regardless of whether he marked it or not, it is plagiarism and should be investigated for legal responsibility.

That should be clear, right?

No one has written the idea of "I Come from the Book List", but because the bell insists on using real work information, it involves the quoted content, and even some props of other works will appear, so it is the fourth and only the fourth type that marks the source and source.

In fact, for other works, this book treats them as "historical materials", just like Luo Guanzhong's "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" uses many things from Chen Shou's "Romance of the Three Kingdoms", but it does not prevent "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" from being a classic original (just a metaphor, the bell does not mean to be compared with the Three Kingdoms, don't slap your face, it hurts).

Take 10,000 steps back.,Infinite stream、Homo this kind of similarity is extremely high.、Direct application of the world structure.,Even the same story line of the work is original.,A new book that just appears in the work information or props and items.,It's really not a righteous and awe-inspiring hat.。

Therefore, no matter what kind of book is written in the future, what achievements can be achieved, readers can criticize the poor writing, can scold the bell for making up nonsense, and even say that the bell is clever (no way, the fact is like this, I can only pinch my nose and admit it, otherwise I can't write the essence of this idea, in order to write this idea, even the place name I use at risk is the real place name), however, all book reviews involving "imitation", "misappropriation", "plagiarism" and the like, will be deleted and blacked out without explanation.

[Last question, the follow-up arrangement of this book!]

This book is currently one update; after signing the contract, two changes will be guaranteed, one in the morning and one in the evening; if the results are good, it will break out from time to time depending on the specific situation; ...... I hope you will have a lot of support.

In addition, Bell has built a book list "I come from the book list", if everyone is interested, they can come and play together (search for "I come from the book list" can be found), and discuss the plot in it, such as what magical items he wanted when he was a child, and what kind of path he wanted Tang Mo to take...... Etcetera.

In addition, I will open an author self-recommendation post in the book review area later, if there is an author who wants to make his work into this book, you can go to build a building, and the bell of the building will definitely try to read, and if it is appropriate, it will be written into the book at the right time, and included in the book list.

Oh, I almost forgot.,Someone asked what the "ω" sign in the introduction of the item means.,Spoiler alert.,This is the biggest foreshadowing of this book.,As for what kind of foreshadowing.,Please stay tuned.,Hahaha.。

Bell promises that the follow-up plot of this book will not only make you feel invincible, but also shocking your eyes and making you feel unbelievable!

Dizzy, nagging 4,000 words, scared people to death!!

All the problems are explained at one time, and in the future, Bell will focus on weaving the story, and will never engage in this kind of single chapter again!!

Finally, the babies are welcome to uphold the principle of "not abandoning and not giving up", and continue to pamper the little bell, hahaha!!