First of all, I would like to thank the readers who have been subscribing to my support, if it weren't for your existence, I guess I would have been a eunuch very early, for the readers who praise me, thank you, let me know the feeling of being appreciated, and for the readers who spit on me, I also thank you, after all, it is because of this part of the people that I have seen the countless faults of this book.

If I get the highest score of 5, I give my work a 3 points.

One point, given the basic framework of the story, aside from the elements of description, I think there should be no problem in the general framework.

One point, give yourself persistence, after all, this is the first book I have written, which can be said to be a small breakthrough.

One point, give fate the world, it may be a bit high to say this, but it is fate or FGO that dragged me out of the trough of my life.

The point deducted is that the character design, whether it is original or borrowed, I don't have a good grasp of it.

Another point deducted lies in the writing power and the arrangement of the story, which is too immature, maybe this is the problem of too many eunuchs, and the story written has a feeling of being broken into slag.

I have to tell the truth that after writing this book, I don't have a feeling of reluctance, but a feeling of "finally finished", not a burden, after all, the burden of writing is of my own making.

There are indeed too many collapses and differences in the setting, but when I learned about these from various channels (games, materials), it has reached a point where it cannot be reversed, which can also be said to be a lack of preparation in the early stage, and the feeling of blindly going to the battlefield.

The portrayal of the characters, the description of the battles, and a series of writing skills are basically not satisfying in my own opinion, and the only part of the book that I feel best is the Arthurian legend, although it is only a small section.

Having said so much, I just want to make one point clear, that is, I am too vegetable, so I am also grateful again to the readers who have supported me all the way, and I am really grateful for always supporting the book written by such a rookie.

In terms of characters, there is actually quite a lot to say.

The character of Lowe Hidley is described in my own character, which is simply to set up the scene, then put myself in it, see what I think, and then write it.

But to say that, it seems to have a bit of a sense of self-praise, after all, I don't have it when I am studious, I can only say that I am willing to learn what I am interested in, and if I am not interested, I don't want to pay attention to it.

This has caused many readers to react, this protagonist has a weird personality, maybe it's me.

As for Miria and Messeri, the two female characters I focused on in the first two volumes were originally designed to be nothing more than cannon fodder in the Holy Grail War, and they were just one of the targets of Rovi's defeat, so I wrote them alongside the Atlas siblings in the first chapter.

It's just that I wrote it later.,Suddenly I had an inexplicable feeling.,But a few chapters later.,I fell in love with them.,But this feeling hasn't been able to be expressed through words.,It's still the point that I said at the beginning.,The pen is not enough.,I don't feel like the charm of these two is shown.。

One reader once said, "The author should not delight the characters, but the reader." ”

That's a pretty true statement, especially for commercial works like this, but I just didn't keep my hands on it.

Let's talk about one of the most controversial figures, Rhaenys.

When I first read the first volume of "Monarch Ermelo II", she didn't have many scenes, and according to the information on the Internet, I made her into a "demon", which is quite cruel and unreasonable.

But when I tried my best to describe her as an extreme evil, I saw the second volume and felt that she didn't.... And the devil?

According to the original work's self-description, she is indeed a person who will be happy to see other people's pain, but in the description of the original work, I think she is still a little cute, and her attitude towards Weber's inner disciple, that is, Gray, is quite good, and for a moment I have a bad impression of this character.

After all, I still don't know enough, and if I had learned about this in the first place, I would definitely describe her as a [little devil] personality like Miria, so I guess there would be less controversy.

That's what I'm talking about, a bad grasp of the original characters.

Of course, when it comes to the world of Fate, most of the focus is definitely on the Heroic Soul Servant.

Then I have to talk about X.

In fact, when it was first designed, X was not a simple Artoria, the concept at that time was to introduce a parallel universe, and set the slave universe where X was located as a parallel universe {this is also the case now}, and then Artoria's soul actually coincided with the [gentle] ordinary person Artoria in another parallel universe, so the initial X would show that kind of soft attitude, which should not be the case if it is real.

At that time, the ending was set by Luo Wei through the gem left by X after the end of the final battle, and summoned her again.

And what was summoned was the simple [gentle] Artoria, and Luo Wei forgot about the parallel world through the gem sword left by the jewel man, and in the absence of Milia as the heroine, I still regarded Artoria as the ultimate heroine.

After all, Artoria is really good.

It's actually pretty good to think about, but the reason why I didn't do it is very simple, the problem of the setting.

There are many original projects that have been abandoned because of setting problems, and for example, in fact, when it was originally designed, Aegean Lowe only met Illya, and did not meet Shirou and Rin, and that time in the Aegean Sea was still the orthodox Seven Holy Grail War, and then Rowe went to Atlas Academy, only to meet Shirou and Rin, and introduced the concept of beasts there.

Of course, it's not right to attribute all the problems of garbage writing to the setting, since the Kamran chapter, Honkai has been around for a long time.

The reason is also simple, poor grades.

There's no need to say anything about this, but now that I think about it, the garbage you wrote deserved a bad grade.

Then why have I been able to persist in writing for so long? Probably because I don't want to be eunuchs anymore, after all, there are five or six books of what I have written before, let alone eunuchs, and this time I can't say anything about it anymore.

What I want to say, that's probably all there is to it, and it's nonsense.

released "The Day of Sin" before, and also participated in the essay competition, but judging from the results alone, it is not as good as this book at the beginning.

Lose.

Loss is followed by reflection.

Maybe I'm in too much of a hurry and want to reap huge benefits?

So I also stopped "Sin Day", and recently I have been making up for fate in various evils, except for the feeling of going out of the east.

In the case of insufficient settings, I plan to use FGO, which I know best, as a new start, and continue to create the next one.

Although it was a boring and chaotic day, it was a good experience, and in the next part, I will try to improve the shortcomings of this book and make it better.

The title of the next book has been decided, it will be called "The Chaldean Director", and I also trouble readers, and I support OvO a lot

2017.9.17 15：18