Chapter Seventy-Three: Self-Breakthrough

Zheng Zifu, the first person on the list, once had the experience of becoming famous in one of the online games, Zheng Zifu said that I forgive others for their deception, I believe in the kindness of others, but I can't expect too much from others, this is too much self-expression, if, the years have not been old, I don't want to be pure, always show people with sadness, whenever the carnival sounds, and I will always read the curtain call, thinking of the incomplete. Pen, fun, pavilion www. biquge。 info If, the years have not grown old, I don't want to sit and wait for the annual rings to roll up, I will not let friendship and love quietly slip away in the name of vicissitudes of life, but exhaust the time of this life, write songs for love with the warmest words, and compose music for love. Life is a choice, but also a kind of giving up. People who can choose freely are happy, and those who can give up moderately are free and easy. Unfortunately, sometimes our choice is to wait, with no result, and we can only leave gloomily; sometimes we give up, forced to turn around with tears, and still look back frequently when we are far away. Why do we always not know how to cherish the people in front of us? In the unpredictable reunion, we think that there will always be a reunion, there will always be a chance to meet again, and we always think that we have the opportunity to say sorry, but we never think that every wave of goodbye may be a farewell, and every sigh may be the last sigh in the world. When you love someone, but you can't have him, you are faced with a choice: give up or continue. Many people, including you, say: give up, don't waste your youth anymore. However, I understand that I really can't let go. If I could let go, I would have let go a long time ago, and I wouldn't be where I am now. So, when the night came, I could only miss one person alone. In the vast sea of people, there is no one who does not like happiness, no one who does not look forward to happiness, and no one who does not yearn for happiness. But different times have different understandings, different classes have different views, and different ages have different requirements. No matter how different they are, one thing is the same, that is, when happiness comes, you will feel more wonderful than wonderful, happier than happy, and you will always be excited and even burst into tears. At a certain time, it is full of mystery and vitality, so that you can understand the hardships of "hoeing the day of the noon"; and let you know that some of the seeds sown by yourself may not be harvested, however, the greatest benefit from it is not the result, but the understanding of the WTO situation, humility and prudence, with a bow of the head of the Taoguang to nourish the obscurity, step by step, break through the siege, and surpass oneself. If you feel that life is a kind of difficulty, you will lose in the first place. If you think that making things difficult is a kind of carving, you will win sooner or later. I think that even in the ancient feudal economy, the price was related to (partial) demand......

If a person spends a lot of manpower and material resources to build a tall tower, but does not pay much attention to it, is this considered valuable labor?...... If it is just a failed attempt, it may be a waste of manpower and material resources, but if it is said that it has accumulated experience, it seems to have a little value...... However, there is another situation, if such a tower is discovered and praised by the expedition team, but only one person says that it is beautiful, is it a little bit of value, or is it a waste of manpower and material resources?...... In another case, if a believer builds a tower with religious overtones, which is regarded as extremely important by the believers and is not understood by others, how can this be judged as valuable?......

Perhaps, some people will say that it is better to build a useful house than to build a useless tower because of faith, does this mean that the value of labor also depends on demand?......

I believe that the value of labor itself is difficult to quantify, measure, and standardize...... However, it may be possible to measure the value created by labor in the commodity economy in terms of recognized "prices", but it is also difficult to say......

For example, how much money is sold for a mobile phone, in terms of the terminal of the industrial chain, in terms of products, the price of the mobile phone minus the price of purchased parts is not the labor value of assembly?...... I think it needs to be divided into two parts: tools and facilities input and labor value, after all, tools are not made by themselves; tools and facilities (machines and plants, and raw materials required for maintenance) can have a price, but the labor of the enterprise, in addition to assembly workers, does the management personnel count? Does the cleaner count? Does the company canteen aunt count? (If there is no cleaner, maybe the workshop will not be clean, and you can't make a good mobile phone. Although it is estimated to be a dust-free workshop, it is also necessary to clean the vents occasionally, and if there is no canteen aunt to take care of lunch, many employees may not be able to go to work, and it may not be so good to make mobile phones)......

Marx believed that the income of capitalists has "surplus value", and I think it makes sense from the perspective of the system (some people have suggested that the landlord class really has "surplus value" because there is really nothing to do; what about the landlords who let people come to rent?), but from the perspective of investment, it is impossible to accurately measure the value brought by investment (strategy), just like the "moving wood and getting lost", and whether there is a demand for what is made......

Investment is risky and needs to be cautious, this kind of has always been said...... If everybody can become a capitalist if he or she borrows, and is fair to everyone (though not entirely fair), can it be said that it is purely the workers who do not have the adventurous spirit and are thus poor? - according to Marx's "class nature", this seems to belong to the bourgeois position...... However, judging from the value of labor itself, it is not necessarily only the labor of workers that belongs to labor, but the specific value cannot be accurately measured, especially for decision-making, after all, "history has no ifs...... Thank you for supporting Zheng Zifu, the first person on the list, and thank you for the end of this chapter.

;