It's on Sanjiang, and it is said that it is time to open a separate Sanjiang testimonial. Pen, Fun, Pavilion www.biquge.info I found that a work related to it hadn't been posted yet, so I just made do with it.

First, let's talk about the purpose of this book.

Generally speaking, web novels do not emphasize the purpose of creation. Because 99% of online novels have no social value, they can't educate anything, and it's over after laughing.

But in addition to being cool in this book, I think it still has some social value, so I'll take a look at it.

The main purpose of this book is to help you look forward to the human content industry in the near-future technology environment, and see how readers can become more useful people in the future.

To answer this question, we must first take a look at what pain points in the content and media fields still exist in this era with the help of existing technology.

When it comes to the topic, many Xiaobai will definitely jump out first and say: "No! I don't feel any pain points! Any cool articles I want to watch, simple and rough games, and exciting hormonal music, the Internet provides me with absolutely sufficient supply, I can be infinitely cool without spending money, what are the pain points!"

Lao Bai and those who are forced may hesitate a little: "Although the Internet provides countless free pirated copies, why do you feel that there is a shortage of books/shadows/games? There is more and more junk information, and the really good ones cannot be found." ”

So, our world is far from rich enough to cause mass unemployment.

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE HAS DEVELOPED SO FAR, EVEN IF THE MASTER (THE EVOLUTION OF THE ALPHA DOG) HAS ELIMINATED KE JIE, GU LI, AND LEE SEDOL, AND EVEN IF THE ROBOTS OF THE DEEP-MIND FAMILY HAVE RETURNED TO COMPOSE LIMERICKS AND SIMPLE COMPOSITIONS, THEY ARE FAR FROM REPLACING HUMANS FOR REAL ARTISTIC AND CULTURAL CREATION.

Why?

Because human beings still have at least pain. The old whites, or even higher, have the string of pursuing spiritual freedom in their hearts, and they still have pain.

If there is pain, the machine can't solve it, and it needs to be done by humans, and humans will not be eliminated.

Those who are eliminated are only those who make themselves machines, similar to machines.

If a person has the original intention, the self, and the free soul, and can discover his attributes that are different from those of machines or even artificial intelligence, then no matter what step the development of science and technology reaches, he can be the last to be eliminated.

So, what kind of person is not like a machine?

This proposition is so ambitious that we have to introduce the background first.

When human beings transition from the era of handicraft customization to the era of industrialized large-scale production, what they reap is the convenience of mass sales brought by industrialized large-scale production. However, this does not mean that industrial mass production is already beneficial and 100% surpasses the era of handicrafts.

At least in the era of handicrafts, clothes are tailor-made by tailors, and meals are cooked with a single pot and a small stove, which is definitely more accurate and meets the personalized needs of users than the rotten goods that barely maintain people's survival in the industrial style.

The advantage of industry is only that it is sold in large quantities and cheaply, so that the poor who could not afford these products in the old era of handicrafts can now afford them - not that the things of industrialization are really of good quality and performance to meet the needs of users.

If we do not recognize this and simply think that all angles of industrialization are better than those of the handicraft era, then there is no need to discuss the subsequent issues.

This part of the people is equivalent to the pollution and big chimneys brought by industry, as a great totem to worship as a brainless.

The content industry, in the pre-Internet era, still has a bit of artistic ethics. But after entering the initial barbaric phase of the era of big data, everything temporarily became superficial, short-sighted, and despicable.

The first two episodes of the American drama began to pour nearly half of the filming resources into the whole drama, and invited the most famous directors and screenwriters to shoot. Once he became a god, he immediately reduced his capital to make up the plot, and if he didn't become a god in two episodes, he immediately cut off Tai J".

Needless to say, the "Golden Three Chapters" can be changed 50 times, and once a huge number of readers are successfully introduced into the pit, the investment will be reduced immediately. Even after becoming a god, he opened a studio, invited a bunch of gunmen, and the platinum giant god just wrote the beginning.

The vast majority of resources are wasted on "making the boutique stand out from the garbage group", but ignoring the sustainable quality that the boutique itself should pay attention to.

With these pains, there is a goal to strive for in the future.

If there could be a DEEP-MIND-based robot that would have an understanding similar to that of a human reader's novel. And its reading speed is a million times faster than that of the human "Shennong" (just as Alpha Dog can use the Monte Carlo tree-like algorithm to play 1 million games in the time that Ke Jie and Gu Li play 1 game of chess). ）

This kind of "artificial intelligence Shennong" can fairly break the American drama of "the first two episodes of the masterpiece" or only focus on the "Golden Three Chapters" / "sensationalism before the shelf" and the second half of the spiritual garbage that is as bad as a dog, and extract the purification of the real human spiritual civilization.

So, how much energy, time, and money should human beings spend on this goal? I think no amount is too much.

The purpose of this book is to discuss a savior of the content industry who has created the power of such a set of laws based on near-future technology. As for how this grand goal will be achieved and how it will be deduced, friends who have patience can wait and see.

However, you really have to be patient.

……

Finally, in the future, in the process of human beings achieving these grand goals, what kind of people are not easy to be eliminated by artificial intelligence.

Now many self-media people on technology channels like to boast of a ratio: under the increasingly turbulent tide of artificial intelligence, 98% of the existing jobs will be eliminated, leaving only 2%.

That's not to say 98% of people will lose their jobs, though. Most of them will still have a new job, but that job doesn't exist on Earth today.

So, who will stay, who will be eliminated? Is there a relatively simple and easy-to-understand rule?

My answer is: yes.

My reasoning is that every advancement in technology is based on human "laziness", or human desire to conform to instinct.

For example, humans don't like to carry heavy loads and walk long distances, so they have cars and boats.

Human beings don't like to do simple and repetitive assembly line operations, so there is the first generation of industrial robots programmed by PLC.

Humans didn't like to copy, so there were typewriters and photocopiers.

Humans don't like memorization and memorization, so there are databases and Baidu.

Humans also don't like to do repetitive customer service, answer questions, and answer the same questions. SO NOW THE COURT IN HANGZHOU HAS BEGUN TO USE ROBOT CUSTOMER SERVICE OPERATORS, AND SALMAN KHAN HAS OPENED A "KHAN ACADEMY" ON YOUTUBE.

The driving force for human beings to move forward is always because human beings are still "lazy", and there are some things that they find boring and unwilling to do, but they have to rely on perseverance to force themselves to do.

So man invented a machine that had no emotion and would not get bored, and then liberate man from that self-imposed trouble.

In ancient times, there were many examples of "only by suffering hardship can you become a superior person", because science and technology are not developed, human beings have many opportunities to force themselves with perseverance. He can endure the hardships that others can't endure, so he climbs up.

In the future, there will be fewer and fewer opportunities to push yourself with perseverance.

For example, a soldier encourages himself with "others are not willing to be disciplined, others will be timid, but I am willing to persevere with perseverance".

As a result, can human beings be more cold-blooded and fearless than machines? More disciplined than machines? Therefore, soldiers who have only discipline and fearless qualities will surely be swept into the dustbin of history.

For example, a "bitter scholar" who has a good memory and wants to gain an advantage by rote memorization of his book bag...... Forget it, I don't even bother to give an example.

Civil and military examples, one for each, I think it's enough. I have no intention of hacking any profession.

I just want to say one thing: find your true love. In the future, there will be more and more opportunities to stay true to our original intention, and there will be fewer and fewer opportunities to force ourselves by perseverance.

Only the things that humans really like will not be eliminated by machines. Because human beings are not cheap enough to invent a machine to enjoy themselves instead.

If a job can really make practitioners feel interested, happy, and willing to do it even if the money is less. Even if it doesn't seem to pay as much as the jobs that require "hard work".

But it can at least survive the AI wave for the longest time.