"Are you here from Tsinghua University?"

After Gu Cheng asked the boy dumbfounded, Yun turned to the other audience beside him lightly.

As soon as the words fell, a bunch of girls raised their hands.

The people sitting there were all Tsinghua students, and there were always thirty or fifty of them.

So Gu Cheng casually ordered a girl who looked relatively the most pleasing to the eye. The girl hurriedly stuffed the tissue in her hand into her clothes, stood up nervously and excitedly, and waited for Gu Cheng's interrogation.

"You Tsinghua University, do you want to take a basic course in law when you are a freshman?" Gu Cheng's expression was very kind, making people feel like a spring breeze.

"Well, of course there is a class. The girl's face turned red, she was so excited that she didn't want to, being able to ask questions by someone like Gu Cheng by name is more worthy of a special mention than getting a scholarship. The girl replied with only one thought in her mind:

When I graduate, I must write on my resume that "I have spoken to Gu Cheng on a certain day, a certain year, a certain month, and a certain occasion".

When looking for a job, this experience may be worth more than her diploma from Tsinghua University.

Gu Cheng kept his rhythm and continued to smile and ask: "So, do you remember what the description of citizens' faith-admiration-freedom in the constitution-law is?"

"Eh, me...... I don't remember...... I'm really sorry, we are both science and engineering students, and the law foundation class in the freshman year is an open-book exam......" The girl was caught off guard and was so ashamed that she almost cried.

That was an opportunity to be questioned by a great god like Gu Cheng!

The question is, how could Gu Cheng's train of thought jump so much!

"Don't you remember? Okay, it's okay. Gu Cheng still couldn't see the unhappiness, and was very kind and kind.

"For the sake of illustration, I don't want to read the law along the way, but let's interpret it backwards - in the Constitution, the most subtle stipulations on citizens' freedom of belief and admiration are 'the freedom to choose whether to participate in religious activities, the freedom to choose which religion to believe, and the freedom to choose which religion to believe', but before all this, the most fundamental and direct article is 'the freedom to choose whether to believe in or not to believe in religion'.

Therefore, having freedom of belief does not mean that you have to choose a faith. True freedom, first of all, should allow people to give up. In the same way, the description of autonomous marriage in civil law is the same: a citizen has the freedom not to be interfered with by any other person or organization in his marriage decision, but first of all, he has the freedom to decide not to marry for the rest of his life.

In modern society, the values that are worthy of human pursuit are too diverse. SOME THINGS MAY BE IMPORTANT TO SOME PEOPLE, BUT NOT AT ALL FOR OTHERS. Just like in the United States, there are countless people who have not voted in the general election for decades, and they don't care who is the president.

In contrast, a mobile phone or computer user, if he wants to save a little worry, 'just want to have a quick and improvisable functional software to use, can meet the needs of work or playing time, and does not care whether the software is the most suitable for him, whether it is pushed to him by others through all kinds of behind-the-scenes transactions to tempt him to use it' - what is this worth?

THEREFORE, CHOOSING TO USE THE IPHONE JUST SHOWS THAT THESE PEOPLE DON'T CARE AND SAVE TROUBLE. I always have the utmost understanding and tolerance for these consumers, and I don't feel that they have a problem. In Apple's case, the fault lies with Jobs, and it has nothing to do with consumers!

Like, even if a man has the malice of **, he tries to have sex with an unmarried woman. But what if this woman doesn't have a sexual fidelity obligation to any man, and she happens to be willing to enjoy this ***? Is she also wrong? We can't condemn even the woman who happens to want to experience *** because the bad man is here with a dirty heart?

There is no problem that the consumer can give up certain rights that he does not care about. But I must ensure that as long as there is even one person in this world who cares about this freedom, I will protect their freedom! I think this is my international obligation. ”

Gu Cheng finished this majestic, commanding and compassionate sentence in one breath.

The girls in the audience were all confused, and they worshipped so much that they didn't want to.

However, a few boys who have a strong habit of Jingyouzi and usually like to point fingers at the country and talk about the past and the present are very angry when they hear this: You can even say things like "This is an international obligation that I should undertake"? Who are you?

Who doesn't know that Gu Cheng's words were born from President Truman's words 60 years ago on the eve of the Cold War: "Rice nuts have an international obligation to lead the free world"?

At that time, the context of Truman's remarks was to endorse what Qiu Silly Fat had just said: "From Cheshcin on the shores of the Baltic Sea to Trieste on the Adriatic coast, an iron curtain has fallen."

(Note: "Trieste" is a place name in Austria, and it is not that I mistyped the two "of" words in the previous sentence.) ）

How can you Gu Cheng be virtuous, even if you have a few stinky money and a lot of international influence, you are worthy of saying this?

So the Tsinghua inch man who asked the question just now immediately protested and asked:

"IT'S JUST A CONSUMER INFRINGEMENT CASE, DON'T SAY THAT YOU ARE SO GREAT! WHAT APPLE HAS DONE IN THE APP-STORE REVIEW SYSTEM, ISN'T YOUR 'ALIPAY SECURITY GUARD' SIMILAR?

Those similar software with similar functions, which can get the priority recommendation position in the 'installation must-have' software library, which users may not be able to search for active search, and it doesn't depend on your company's sorting?

The boy wasn't qualified to ask questions because he interjected casually. At that time, the microphone was still in the hands of a girl next to him who was separated by two positions. He leaned over and grabbed the microphone to force his speech.

When the host Sa Beining saw this posture, his face suddenly turned cold. The heart said that this section would definitely be cut out after a while.

This is no longer a matter of asking whether it is appropriate, but completely ignoring the order of the program, which is a "broadcast accident".

He gestured behind his back, signaling the director to pinch off the two microphones in the audience's hands, and was ready to open his mouth to maintain order.

However, he didn't expect that just as he was about to pinch, Gu Cheng didn't feel sorry for this question at all, and answered it positively.

"This classmate, when doing things, you have to talk about evidence, and if you don't investigate, you don't have the right to speak. WHAT YOU SAID ABOUT 'WHAT APPLE HAS DONE IN THE APP-STORE, ALIPAY SECURITY GUARD HAS ALSO DONE', THIS ASSUMPTION IS NOT VALID IN THE FIRST PLACE. What's more, even if this assumption is true, the legal rationality of a software company doing such a thing is completely different from that of a hardware company.

The company that sells hardware sells physical products, and physical products have property rights, and property rights are absolute dominating rights.

Companies that sell software sell the "right to use" without "things", so the laws of each country themselves allow the two parties to negotiate how to use it.

Secondly, now we can discuss whether the premise you just mentioned is true - Alipay Security Guard will of course provide users with a 'must-have' software library for installation, but this software library is open source when users actively search for it.

Any software vendor, as long as they want their products to be searched by the installation software library of 'Alipay Security Guard', can be put into the warehouse as long as they apply. However, until we verify its safety, we don't show its software rating, only its approximate number of downloads.

This is very different from Apple's mandatory access review, and the Alipay security guard provides only reference opinions. Moreover, over the past few years, we have been very careful to optimize our user experience and try not to mislead users. Three years ago, we prompted the installation of unaudited software to pop up a yellow prompt window that said "This software has not been verified for security", so that consumers were fully aware of the risks and still chose to install it, so we would not interfere with anything.

Now, considering that 'although yellow is a neutral color, it is not naturally equivalent to the warning effect of red', we still took the initiative to change the color of the prompt pop-up to dark blue, which is more mild, so that users who don't know the truth will feel that the software is dangerous just because of a yellow pop-up.

Every company under my name, any piece of software, has always been about giving the world and its consumers more choice, without forcing them to accept a combination of certain choices. If you turn a blind eye to all of this, then I don't think there's any point in me saying more. ”

Gu Cheng said, revealing an indifferent expression of "ignorance at the bottom, not enough to speak with Coats", and ended the conversation.

The host Sa Beining squeezed the microphone's hand, clenched it several times and released it several times, and saw that Gu Cheng completely held this slightly malicious question, so he broke off the idea of post-editing.

The handsome little guy wanted to say something, but what he saw was the disgusting eyes of all the girls around him, and his old face turned red and he retreated in shame.

He was not completely stunned, the reason why he spoke so impulsively today is that he is not in the media circle, and he may seize such an opportunity to be on CCTV in his life. Even if he offends CCTV by acting too violently, he will not have the opportunity to appear on TV again in the future, and there is no loss to him.

Second, looking at the only few female classmates in the grade who are not good-looking, they can barely be regarded as goddesses, just now they saw Gu Cheng pretending to be forced to be about to flow down, his face was sluggish, he was not angry, and he wanted to use this way to guide the country to win attention.

Everyone knows that Gu Cheng didn't go to college seriously, and his Harvard degree was still obtained by a three-star person through the back door.

And Gu Cheng did not refuse at that time, which once made many domestic students who were born in the class maliciously speculate that he did not study much, and he was not good at debate, but he was just a genius in the media and business.

It's a pity that everyone who has such illusions is disappointed.

Remember the mobile version URL: m.