[Chapter 2, Volume 2]

Chapter 364 Chapter 364: Killing Gods, Killing Ghosts, Killing Buddhas

After sorting out his thoughts, he began to answer the questions quickly. Pen × fun × Pavilion www. ｂｉｑｕｇｅ。 ｉｎｆｏ

First of all, he explained the words "request" and "report" a little bit in the ancient language, which is a bit of a new interpretation of the old language and a novel idea, and then completely cited this small example that had bothered him for a long time. From the beginning of this issue, it was frequently planted and fighting, and it was not until the end that the whole process was clarified, and it was brushed aside.

Next, he began to point out the differences.

The so-called "report" is that it only needs to be reported to the higher-level leading organ to know about it, and it is an informative type of text, and there is no necessary requirement for the instructions of the higher-level organ, that is to say, when the higher-level leader reads the report, he only needs to draw a circle and express that he knows, and there is no need to indicate the attitude of "yes" or "no".

The so-called "request for instructions" must be a request for a matter of time, and the leading organ at a higher level is asked to indicate "yes" or "no". After receiving this "request for instructions," the leading organ at a higher level must make a reply, and its attitude must be clear.

For this reason, it is sufficient to add the sentence "hereby reported" at the end of the report, and the request for instructions must be accompanied by the words "Yes or no, please instruct".

Finally, he deliberately emphasized the experience gained through practical exploration, that is, although the provisions of official documents are very clear, in practice, they are very easy to confuse and lead to frequent mistakes.

First, there is a difference between "request" and "report" that is easy to ignore. In the report, one or more matters can be reported, but the request for instructions is different and requires one request for instructions. This is because if there is a joint request for instructions on multiple matters, if the higher authority only agrees to one of them and not to the other, then it is impossible to express the attitude of "yes" or "no" in the overall request for instructions, so it is necessary to ask for instructions on each matter.

The second is that the "report" can make suggestions, but it is strictly forbidden to include matters for instructions. Sometimes, it is convenient for the report writer to make some suggestions after reporting on the work and reflecting the situation, and then "entrain" the matters to be approved by the higher-level organs, which is actually a particularly common mistake. The writer thought that this would save him the trouble of writing a separate request, but it backfired. According to the provisions of the official document, the higher level organ does not reply to the report of the lower level organ. Therefore, the content of "entrainment" in the report that requires instructions may become "mud cattle into the sea". Even if the higher-level organ reads the report and discovers this kind of "entrainment" and informs it that it must ask for instructions on the relevant matters separately, it will delay the handling of the matter and the gains outweigh the losses.

This question has been answered here, and it is considered complete.

I looked at the time again, and it took less than ten minutes, and at this rate, I only needed another twenty minutes to finish all the short-answer questions and focus on the last big question.

Soon, he began to ponder the third short-answer question.

The third short-answer question is: If your supervisor and the main leader disagree, how do you deal with it, please explain it in light of the actual situation.

Another illustration based on the actual situation!

He thought about it, and began to admire the questioner this time. According to common sense, such questions test the candidate's ability to deal with complex interpersonal relationships, and are generally placed in the interview. But this time it was actually placed in the written test, which shows that the questioner is still very ingenious, breaking the original framework of the written test and interview, and comprehensively examining the candidate's multi-faceted ability, which is definitely an innovation.

What kind of people in Xijing will have such a level? Although it is said that the Organization Department, the Personnel Bureau, the Double High Center and several other companies jointly came up with the problem, but the proposal can be made by everyone, and the decision must be attributed to one general, and there must be only one person who plays a leading role. This person is definitely a master, has he ever been personally ordered by Wang Yixuan?

He didn't dare to think too much, but for now, he still needed to hold his breath and concentrate on answering!

After a short period of thought, he probably sorted out his answer ideas.

His mind is very clear, such a question, before answering the question, you must be clear, you can't directly answer "yes" or "no"!

This is because there is an unsolvable trap set at the beginning of this question!

The principal leader generally refers to the number one leader of the unit, who has absolute authority. As for the supervisor, the leader is generally the deputy of the unit, in charge of the work. It's also very powerful.,It's my direct boss.。 As the saying goes, the current official is not as good as the current management, and the official is crushed to death. Although the main leader is domineering, after all, there is a layer in the middle, and it is the leader in charge who is directly facing him. So these two people, no one can afford to offend, if there is a difference in their opinions, this is a clear obstacle to set up, if you directly express your support for whom, it is self-defeating, and you deserve to die.

Such a topic must be considered from both positive and negative aspects, and to put it bluntly, we must learn to "play Tai Chi", say harmony at both ends, value harmony, avoid this obstacle point, and find reasons from ourselves.

So, he answered the main points one by one, and finally did not forget to combine his own reality.

First, there is a disagreement between the main leader and the supervisor leader, which needs to be carefully analyzed. First of all, we must find the reason from ourselves, whether it is because of our own work that causes the two leaders to disagree.

Second, strengthen communication, straighten out the possible problems in the work and communicate them one by one, and eliminate the situation that may lead to misunderstanding due to poor communication.

Third, if the differences still exist and the main leaders insist, then take the initiative to do the work of the supervisors, follow the organizational principles, and implement them according to the opinions of the main leaders.

Fourth, in the process of implementation, pay attention to the first time to reflect all kinds of situations to the competent leaders, and if there is a need to adjust and amend, report to the main leaders together with the competent leaders to ensure that the corrections are in place, the adjustments are in place, and the implementation is in place.

To say that the main points he answered are still quite to the point!

The first point is to avoid the trap and find the reason from yourself, which is equivalent to grasping the hidden condition implied in the title, that is, only saying that the two leaders have differences but not explaining why they have differences, starting from their own work reasons, this is the most correct attitude. As long as this first point is answered, the judge is sure to give a high score.

The second point points out the core of the investigation of this question, not to agree with the main leader, nor to agree with the leader in charge, before the right and wrong are clarified, it is a dead end to please anyone. The most important thing to do is to strengthen communication and avoid misunderstandings due to poor communication.

The third point is a more painful choice, but there is no way to do it, for the answer to this kind of question, even if you are good at "playing Tai Chi", you can't completely beat it. The meaning expressed here is very clear: if after repeated communication and reconciliation, there are still big differences between the two leaders, then it is necessary to talk about politics and organizational principles. The opinions of the main leaders represent the opinions of the organization, so at this time, you should take the initiative to do the work of the leaders in charge, keep the differences, and follow the opinions of the main leaders first. Of course, this kind of implementation is not completely unconditional blind obedience, but a process of attention, feedback and adjustment at any time, which is reflected in the fourth point.

Therefore, once the fourth point is written, it is necessary to get a high score, not only adhere to the organizational principles, but also be able to correct and adjust in a timely manner, which is the most correct attitude. With this point out, this five-point question can be scored at least four or even four and a half, and it is possible for the judge to score a perfect score of five as soon as he is happy.

It can be seen from this that the civil service recruitment and promotion examination is actually a test of the candidate's political literacy, whether it is a written test or an interview, it is just to see how you deal with such and such problems. If you have rich experience in politics, a correct political attitude, and sophisticated coping methods, you will definitely be able to get a high score.

You can memorize the questions by rote, but it doesn't last long. There are many things that are changing, and in order to grasp the essence of them, it is often necessary to temper them with experience. Of course, I have been in politics for many years but I don't know how to learn and summarize, and I definitely don't get high scores.

The way of civil and military affairs, one piece and one relaxation, the two should not be wasted. It is precisely because of this that opportunities are often reserved for those who have a heart and for those who understand both theory and practice.

In the blink of an eye, he had come to the last short-answer question.

The fourth short-answer question is: Some people think that "urban-rural integration" is "urban-rural integration", what do you think about this?

After seeing this topic, he fell into deep thought, and to be honest, this is his weakness. Although it has been five years since the Third Plenary Session of the 17th CPC Central Committee proposed to comprehensively promote the integration of urban and rural areas, he really did not think much about it in this regard. Also, in the past few years, it has been a state of playing clever and hiding backwards, and it has been a "lame general" who emphasizes coordination and light text, and it is only recently that the leg of "text writing" has been picked up, which is indeed a little late.

However, the matter has come to this point, and it is useless to regret it, so let's think about how to fight the tough battle in front of us.

He closed his eyes and pondered for a moment, still having no clue.

Suddenly, he thought of a good idea. That is, there is still a lot of potential for their unique selection ability, which can not only be used to make objective multiple-choice questions, but also can be used to solve such subjective problems as long as they are skillfully applied.

So, he calmed his mind, let a chill rise in his heart, and then kept setting up options to answer from his heart.

The first option, which he directly set up, is the content in the title, is "urban-rural integration" "urban-rural integration"?

The heart gave a completely negative answer.

He had some bottom in his heart, and set up some options in a row, such as whether Secretary Yixuan had talked about this issue? In what year was it talked about? At which meeting? What are you talking about? Is it the economy? Society? Industrial development? Urban and rural construction? Wait, at least twenty questions asked. And these questions were not asked in vain, and slowly, he had found the thread to answer the most difficult question for him.

When encountering a question that can be answered, he is proud but does not forget the form, and answers it steadily. When encountering a question that cannot be answered, actively seek a breakthrough, start from the most basic question of right and wrong, and closely follow what Wang Yixuan's big boss thinks and says on this proposition, and you can make a "new article"!

With this one piece and one relaxation, it is already a ghost to kill ghosts, to see gods to kill gods, to see Buddhas to kill Buddhas! In today's battle, who else can stop this Tang general?