[Chapter 2, Volume 2]

Chapter 367 Chapter 367 is out of control

It's really interesting to say, for the last difficult "hard bone", he thought about asking a lot of questions, and almost asked every point how to answer clearly, and then he started writing. Pen × fun × Pavilion www. ｂｉｑｕｇｅ。 info But now that it's more difficult to gnaw on the "diamond-level bone", he just asked about the general direction, and then he didn't ask any more questions, but picked up the pen and wrote.

Maybe it's because he knows that time is running out, or maybe it's because after experiencing the "purgatory" of the short-answer question just now, he has been promoted, and he is no longer confined to asking about his unique ability, but gradually integrating this ability into his blood.

I saw him writing like a god, the dragon flying and the phoenix dancing.

That's how he replied.

The first step is to answer the question directly.

For this more and more "best in history", I personally think it is a good thing, because this kind of "best in history" is mostly blocked by netizens. There are at least seven or eight billion netizens in our country, and although they have such drawbacks as "picking up a bowl to eat, putting down chopsticks and scolding their mothers", and sometimes they are used and misled, but judging from the normal situation, their expression of will still has a reason, and to a large extent, it represents the general public opinion.

The reason why they rated these "best in history", whether it is through "human flesh search" or all kinds of digging deep lace materials, the main reason is to reflect their "right to know" and "right to participate", and the facts have also proved that their "knowledge" and "participation" are not groundless, and it cannot be said that everything is accurate, but it is absolutely true.

You must know that 30% of them were dismissed after being found to have problems, and this data can already explain a lot of problems. Many people think that this 35% is very low, because at least 65% of people have been wronged. As everyone knows, even if you report to the Commission for Discipline Inspection without your name or real name, it is impossible to reach 100%, because reporting does not mean that evidence is presented, and even if evidence is presented, the case filing rate of 50% is already very high.

Therefore, this kind of "demand" of a high proportion of successful netizens just proves that this kind of social supervision based on modern network technology has become a new mainstream method, and as far as our party's leading cadres are concerned, we should not suppress and control this, but on the contrary, we should face up to and face up to this new way of network supervision, and make it a normal state in our work and life.

……

At this point, he can be considered to have finished the first answer to the question. He talked a little too much, but he explained it in simple terms, penetrated into it, and then turned to the beginning and the beginning, and suddenly made it very clear that this "most in history" supervision method should be faced and faced squarely, instead of being afraid, evaded, or even stifled.

……

In the middle of the sway, his thoughts could no longer stop the floodgate, gushing out like a surging river, and the next pen was even more like flying, and he couldn't stop at all.

He quickly moved from argumentation to argumentation, and soon laid out a few key points.

I saw him write that in order to truly face and not dodge, the following points are very critical:

First, it is necessary to cultivate the ability of leading cadres to correctly cope with modern media, especially the new mode of communication on the Internet. The most important thing is to correct the concept, and neither take it seriously, nor avoid it.

Just as it is now that when a major accident occurs, people have become accustomed to questioning the spokesperson of the responsible department. Leading cadres should also learn, accept, and even master and apply the skills and methods of emerging network communication methods in their daily work. If you don't even have the courage to face and bear this point, you can only be eliminated by society.

Second, it is necessary to strengthen the implementation of the existing cadre appointment system. Many people may say that when a new form of supervision is coming, the system of appointing cadres should also be changed and innovation should be accelerated. Although there is nothing wrong with this sentence, we often ignore a problem when we shout for innovation, that is, these 35% of the cadres who have been verified and disposed of are not not innovative enough in the cadre appointment system, but the implementation of the existing cadre appointment system is insufficient.

Some of these "best in history" people are because of nepotism, either the leader's sister-in-law or brother-in-law, or even their own sons and daughters. It stands to reason that the virtuous do not avoid relatives, and this is beyond reproach, but these sons, daughters, brothers-in-law, and sisters-in-law have been promoted and promoted without going through any legal organizational procedures, resulting in them becoming the youngest deputy secretaries of the county party committees and town mayors in history.

There are also not obvious nepotism, but they secretly run for official positions, and they are promoted again and again, and finally it became the most series in history, and finally fell in the investigation and punishment.

These painful examples make up this 35 percent group, and the root cause of this is the indifference or even ignorance of the existing cadre system. In order to eradicate the danger brought about by this "greatest in history" at the root, we must make efforts to strengthen implementation. If it is really implemented, then the heart is open, even if it is exposed as the "youngest mayor in history", he is not afraid of people to check, and after the organization verifies that it is correct, he will be awarded the title of "the most tested mayor in history", how good it would be.

Third, strengthen guidance for the news media. By emphasizing this, this does not mean that the news media are not allowed to report on such "the largest in history", but that as a mouthpiece, the news media should grasp a "degree". This "degree" is very important, not to reject the new online communication methods, but also not to grasp a point and magnify it too much, leading to the occurrence of "exaggerating violence".

For example, some time ago, the "most exquisite person in charge of the science and technology commission in history" was exposed, and a picture of a person in charge of the science and technology commission inspecting an agricultural science and technology base in bright clothes and shoe covers was exposed on the Internet, which aroused a great uproar in public opinion, and there was a denunciation on the Internet, and it was even rumored that the unit had to hide or even remove the person in charge of the unit under pressure from the media in order to survive the "media crisis."

According to the later network exploration, the agricultural science and technology base belongs to the unit with very strict requirements for the entry of the microflora, and wearing shoe covers to visit is a work requirement rather than being arrogant and exquisite, and the person in charge of the science and technology committee is wronged! It's just that this probe came out a little late, and a long time has passed since the person in charge was subjected to "exaggerating violence", and this "clarification" type of probe is far from the level of attention compared with the explosive original news.

Therefore, strengthening the guidance of the news media and maintaining a strong "degree" is the key to being responsible to the public and, even more, to the leading cadres themselves.

Fourth, improve the realization and expression of the social supervision system. As a leading cadre, we must face up to this new way of network communication. For the entire social environment, it is very important to standardize this method, clarify it as a new form of social supervision, and gradually form a long-term institutional mechanism.

In other words, as a new thing, network supervision is in the ascendant, not only for leading cadres, but also for the entire social environment, and it is necessary to gradually improve and standardize the effective speech style of netizens, so as to avoid the occurrence of phenomena such as "malicious attacks", "deliberate retaliation", and "excessive violence", so that this emerging thing can enter a benign channel for healthy development.

……

The answer to the question is here, and combined with some actual situations, he has basically finished answering. To say that this answer is really quite skillful. For this kind of never-before-seen hot topic, the key to answering is to bring forth the new and justify itself. The points he just answered really fully embodied these two points.

If you want to bring forth the new, these four points are relatively new, especially the first two points.

The first is to improve the ability of leading cadres to deal with emerging network communication methods, which is directly elaborated on the basis of arguments, which makes people feel very thirsty to read, and can also create an impression that the examinee has a very strong logical thinking ability, so as to produce a strong sense of resonance. As soon as there is resonance, this point will definitely be given high.

Second, it is based on strengthening the implementation of the existing cadre appointment system, rather than blindly calling for institutional innovation. This is very much in line with the judges' taste! Because the judge is often the leader in reality, what the leader wants to see and hear the most is not that the system is not always bad and needs to strengthen system innovation, but to implement and implement the existing system in a down-to-earth manner. Coupled with the fact that he gave some examples to prove that the truth is the same, it is even more convincing.

These two key points, which are very innovative, will result in at least half of the points once answered.

As for the third and fourth points, it is possible that other candidates will also think of them, but they write these two points as the most important ones in the front, so it is difficult to feel new. However, his answer was not like this, and he put the two most innovative points in the front and the two relatively flat points in the back, in order to make his argument relatively perfect and "self-justifying." Therefore, as soon as the judge saw this, he would nod his head frequently and say, "Hmm! This candidate really answered well, his thinking is very clear, he can not only do new things, but also be able to think about everything, and he will definitely get a high score for this question! ”

What is a new thing to do and a thoughtful one, isn't this a colloquial explanation of "pushing through the old and bringing forth the new" and "justifying oneself"?

In the end, he wrote a sentence summarizing the above, saying a summary and expressing his point of view again. After that, he stopped writing and answered the whole test paper!

Looking at the time, it took less than twenty minutes for such a big question. In other words, I was worried about running out of time just now, but I actually saved nearly fifty minutes of my time now.

This means that it is not difficult for those who will learn, but it will not be difficult for those who are difficult. I really found the trick and wrote it "click", and the feeling of thinking like flying was like pouring beans from a bamboo tube, and I couldn't stop it if I wanted to.

At this moment, his mood was a little surging, and when he was answering the last big question, he found the feeling of "out of control" that Lu Qing mentioned to him before. And after writing the last word, the moment I put the pen away, I really felt like I was playing Tai Chi and holding my fists.

Words are not enough, everything is in words.