One: About copyright.

1. In fact, in the old contract, the author has no copyright...... At a certain point, the full copyright of the author was taken very early, and the term lasted until fifty years after the author's death. After doing this at a certain point, other websites have followed suit, except for a few sites, basically the whole network.

From this example, you should be able to see that in fact, the work itself does not belong to the author, but to the website, which belongs to a relationship similar to "commissioned creation" - that is, the work belongs to our website, and it is only for the author to complete it.

That is, the gunners.

There is also this kind of item in the breach of contract clause: if the author's writing does not meet the requirements, the website can terminate the agreement at any time and ask a third party to renew it, which theoretically means that the website can find a random reason to kick the original author and find someone else to write it under your pen name.

The author does not have any right to protect his work, and even if you want to write it yourself, you have to rely on the gift of the website, pray that he will not kick you out and change the person to write it.

Because under normal circumstances, this kind of clause is generally not exercised, the author still endures it, and the gunman is the gunman, but on the bright side, this is my book.

However, when the author thought that such a contract could no longer be lowered, this new contract easily broke through this lower limit.

Clause 11.1 of the new contract:

Ming Huanghuang defines the relationship between the two parties as "employment", that is to say, the author is the employee hired by our website to write this book, but although it is hired, there is no employment relationship, and it does not provide various benefits such as labor insurance and social security required by law.

It's an employment, it's not an employment relationship, what is it called?

It's called: I'm your father.

That is, many authors are angry: now even the gunman is not as good.

In fact, the essence is no different from before, but there was still a little bit of face before, and I didn't say it openly, but now I blatantly tear my face off, and I just told you that, which made countless authors' mentality explode.

Something is well said: small details such as commissioning creation and hiring authors will not make China Literature get more benefits, but it will make the author very disgusting.

Because the creator has lost even the last bit of dignity.

Two: About free.

In fact, the new contract does not refer to a certain point where the site is free.

Paragraph 5.4 of the new contract:

There are two points to explain here:

1, in fact, it is not a certain point of free, but a group channel, such as browsers, reading, etc., as mentioned before, these have long been free, all kinds of unlimited cards, etc., the author has never received money from such places. That is, official piracy. This time, I just wrote these on the terms and told you that "it should not be regarded as us infringing on your interests, and we are also trying to sell aggressively".

Sales your mother is better than, and if you haven't received a penny for a few years, it's also called active sales?

As long as the brains have not been eaten by zombies, it can be seen that this is a free free book by taking the author's book and going to their various channels to attract traffic. Take your content to drive reader traffic for free, but don't give you a dime.

Normally, this kind of behavior has a professional name: piracy.

Pirate websites are like this, take your book, add popularity to the site, and collect advertising fees to make money.

Familiar with it?

People are very good, official piracy, and I want to tell you that it should not be regarded as infringing on your interests, after all, it is your father. How can a father use his son with a little something, how can it be called a violation?

2. Free does not necessarily mean that the author has no money at all, which should indeed be explained. For example, readers watch advertisements instead of subscribing, here in fact, advertisers pay money, but how much they pay, the author has never seen.

There are some other free stations, the author has received this money, after all, a certain article is a father, not to give.

Someone here will ask, will you be given money in the future?

The problem is that this kind of advertising revenue is very opaque, he said that how much is how much, after all, how much advertisers give to the website, the author will not know.

When other free stations were rising, the authors said that this is the rat that messes up the industry, but unfortunately, now a certain article is doing it himself, and it is more disgusting than those free stations.

After all, the free station also gives the author an advertising fee, and China Literature has never given a dime of advertising money.

You think that's the most disgusting? No, they could be even more disgusting.

Watch the advertisement and give away coins.

The advertising fee is not given to the author, and the bonus coins are not considered money, and they are eaten at both ends.

3. The group channel is free, and the site will not be free at a certain point, which is to use the money of the paid readers of the site to support the author, and they don't need to pay money when they take the work out to other channels to drain it. Isn't there a very interesting meaning here: no matter how free our external channels are, anyway, there are still a group of shabby who are willing to pay at a certain point, and the author can't die.

Anyway, there is Shabi who is willing to spend money to read books, this is the subconscious thinking of a certain article.

Not only hurt the author, but also hurt the readers, so the readers who can see it are furious, this time in addition to the author there are a large number of readers, one is worried that they will not see good works in the future, and the other is because they feel this naked ridicule and humiliation.

To be honest, this kind of behavior is hurting the root of the entire industry.

In the future, the author wants to call readers genuine support, but he doesn't know what face to use to say this sentence

3. Subscription and copyright income issues.

There are too many clauses, just take a screenshot and say an explanation:

Clause 6.9 of the new contract:

1. It is the "net income" after deducting operating costs, which is divided into 50%. The same goes for other subscriptions.

There may be knowledgeable people who can see that the cost of this thing......

Take a step back and say, what are your operating costs, and who do you want to show your financial report?

In fact, 50% of the website is included, including operating expenses, otherwise what is the purpose of sharing 50% of your 50%?

It's a dad after all.

2, that's okay, after all, there is still a share. If you use it yourself, you don't need to pay anything. Note that a point is now not just a point, but a tx point.

So what else does the author have to share? You still sell to others, and I admit that the net income after deducting costs is negative.

Fourth, I can't go.

When the contract of the full copyright overlord was changed at a certain point, many people thought that it would be good to run other stations, but it turned out that other stations did not take advantage of this opportunity to win people's hearts, and the operation they did was to learn from the starting point and change the contract of their own website.

Spread your hands.

It's really humorous society.

So be it.

Can be reprinted.