(Image source: "Т-34.Перваяполнаяэнциклопедия", author КоломиецМаксим Викторович) The picture needs to be reviewed, so let's hit it first~

First of all, the time is between 1943 and 1944, and the existence of 7.5cmL/24 guns that pull down the data can be basically ruled out, and the main force of the Soviet army in 1943 was still T-34/76, and it was not until 1944 that the T-34/85 began to be popularized in the Soviet army. That is, the Soviet losses on this table are basically T-34/76 with a turret of only 52mm.

The first should be the distance distribution of Soviet tanks when they are destroyed by 75mm guns, and the second is the distance distribution of Soviet tanks when they are destroyed by 88mm guns.

The first is the distribution of the loss distance against 75mm guns, which are 10% (100-200m), 26.1% (200-400m), 33.5% (400-600m), 14.5% (600-800m), 7% (800-1000m), 4.5% (1000-1200m), 3.6% (1200-1400m), 0.4% (1400-1600m), 0.4% (1600-1800m), 0%（1800－2000m）。

This is followed by the distribution of loss distances for 88mm guns, which are 4% (100-200m), 14% (200-400m), 18% (400-600m), 31.2% (600-800m), 13.5% (800-1000m), 8.5% (1000-1200m), 7.6% (1200-1400m), 2% (1400-1600m), 0.7% (1600-1800m), 0.5% （1800－2000m）。

Even in the end, the main force of the German army is still No. IV, so the artillery data of the 75mm series is naturally lower than that of the 88mm series.

From this table, it is not difficult to see that whether it is a 75mm series of guns or 88mm series guns, the main results are achieved within 800m.

Isn't it surprising? Why did the German Invincible 88 have to be so close to be able to destroy Soviet tanks? It's not the same as the imaginary Haw Par 2000m away and casually torture the T-34?

Basically, it is very difficult to effectively kill enemy vehicles from a distance of 1500 m for two main reasons:

One is that this distance is too far for the sighting equipment of World War II vehicles, and the hit rate is very low, even the German Carl Zeiss sighting equipment is not good. The early Tiger 9b sight could only be magnified by 2.5 times, and the T-34 at 1000 meters was a small dot, until the later Tiger was replaced with a 9c sight that could be adjusted to 5 times.

Second, the kinetic energy attenuation of artillery shells at this distance is particularly serious, especially for small-caliber shells of the German army. Even the Tiger King 8.8cmKwK.43L/71 has only a penetration depth of 148mm at this distance. Not to mention the 8.8cm KwK.37L/56 of the Tiger style, which wears only a pitiful 91mm at this distance.

The third is that the accuracy of the shells is limited, and it is already very difficult to hit at this distance, and it is also necessary to hit the weakness of the Soviet tanks, which really can only rely on faith.

Therefore, "Haw Par can casually torture and kill the T-34 outside 2000m" is also a theistic theory of the German stick, through the repeated propaganda of individual combat examples, so as to give people the feeling that Haw Par can really abuse and kill the T-34 at will.

In short, cherish life and stay away from the sticks. There is no Dehei in the world, but the German baguette has the ability to force Dehei to the level of Dehei. Many people who know history just refute the theism of Deba, and then they are scolded by Deba, and then the onlookers who don't know the truth follow suit, and finally Dehei's hat is deducted.

Starting Point Chinese www.qidian.com welcome book friends to come and read, the latest, fastest and most popular serialized works are all original at Starting Point! lt; /agt; lt; agt; lt; /agt;