People's Daily Online: "The Trial: The Irresistibility of Authority". Author: Xu Yishan

Recently, I was moved by the injustice that exists in society where it is difficult for some weak people to redress their grievances, and I wrote a novel about the oppression of individuals by the powerful. originally thought that he wrote well, but it wasn't until he saw Ye Yu Xiaoyou's "Trial" that he felt that he had many shortcomings.

Many readers can't understand "The Trial", in fact, it is understandable. Because it is an expressionist novel, in my personal opinion, even if you count foreign literature, Ye Yu Xiaoyou's "Trial" is the pinnacle of expressionism.

So, what is Expressionism?

Expressionism refers to the writer's emphasis on expressing inner emotions through his works, while ignoring the imitation of the form of the depicted object, so it is often manifested as a distortion and abstraction of reality.

In "Trial", Ye Yu Xiaoyou has been alluding to the law, the ubiquitous law! And this law does not only refer to the law, but also to all social forces that transcend the individual, such as social power and public opinion power.

In the early morning of K's thirtieth birthday, he was arrested for no reason. He was sure that it was a mistake, a big joke, and he wanted to prove that his arrest was purely a misunderstanding, but everyone around him believed in the Fa - a story with a predetermined ending played out under the deterrence of the Fa. He actively clarified and ran in many ways, but he was never able to get rid of the framework of the Fa, and under the shadow of the Fa, all his efforts came to naught. The Dharma is "attracted to sin" and requires absolute obedience for no reason. Once the trial begins, there must be guilt.

Why?

Because of people's established mindset!

Although "The Trial" is not over yet, I know that K must have been executed in the end. Because, in my opinion, this is what Ye Yu Xiaoyou wants to express - in front of society, individuals seem helpless and lonely, strong social forces and established thinking patterns restrict people's thoughts and behaviors, and how long can the self-confident resistance last?

Dharma can be found everywhere in K's life:

…… (Here's a whole bunch of specific breakdowns)......

Thinking of Ye Yuxiaoyou's situation during this time, I think he is using this "Trial" to complain.

What is the accusation?

Accusations against the overwhelming media that speculate without evidence! The pen can kill! The overwhelming Black Sea in recent days is a naked example of the oppression of individuals by social forces!

What else is being accused?

Accusing authority!

What authority?

Teacher's authority!

Works such as "Smiling Proud Jianghu" are just bestsellers, which may reflect the character of an author, but in my opinion, they are not enough.

However, I don't believe that the person who can write such a heart-torturing work as "Judgment" will be a person who cheats on the monthly exam because of vanity. For this reason, I specially checked some information and found that the director of the Academic Affairs Office who caught Ye Yu Xiaoyou "cheating" had many conflicts with Ye Yu Xiaoyou and had a bad relationship.

So, is the authority of the so-called "Ye Yu's cheating" remarks by the director of the Academic Affairs Office really worth believing?

Is this "trial", which consists of the authority of teachers and the overwhelming coverage of the media, really fair?

By the way, those media who know about this but pretend not to know, where is your conscience?

Your remarks are cool for a while, you have clicks, and your popularity and traffic are also high, but do you know that you almost ruined the hope for the future of my country's literary circle!

I hope that the relevant departments can intervene in the investigation and give hope to the future of our country's literary circles a clean slate.

As soon as this article came out, it immediately caused an uproar.

Who is Xu Yishan?

One of the top three writers in China!

In the absence of a leader in the literary world, he and the other two are the authorities of the domestic literary world.

And he actually supported "Trial", saying that his work "originally consciously wrote well, until I saw Ye Yu Xiaoyou's "Trial", I felt that I had many shortcomings.

This...... This...... It's a hell of a blow!

As soon as the article was issued, it was put on the homepage news office by People's Daily Online, and comments from netizens followed.

Crying 30,000 times: "No wonder I can't understand it, it turns out to be an expressionist work!" These things are too abstract to hold. ”

A month: "''The hope for the future of my country's literary world', Xu Lao's evaluation of Ye Yu is so high!" As a die-hard fan of Ye Yu, I can't help but give a thumbs up to Xu Lao! ”

What kind of hero is a minute: "Xu Lao is right, I have long suspected that dog. Day. There's a problem with the director of the Academic Affairs Office! How could someone as proud as Ye Yu do such a thing as cheating? ”

I know myself: "I strongly ask the relevant departments to intervene in the investigation of Ye Yu's cheating incident!" ”

** Lose: "The oppression of individuals by social forces!" Alas, there are too many of them now. Didn't there be news some time ago that a man was found to have been wronged after 20 years in prison. The most exciting and infinite period of life was missed. It is hoped that the state will enforce the law prudently and fairly. After all, as written in "The Trial", individual resistance is too powerless in the face of social forces. ”

Humble person: "I strongly ask the relevant departments to intervene in the investigation and return the hope of a clean person in the future of my country's literary circle!" ”

……

People's Daily Online: "Judgment" - I am guilty, therefore I am". Author: Chen Yanlin.

I have always admired Ye Yu, a rising star in the literary world. Some readers may have the impression that I once commented on his "Dream of Jiangnan: The Crow".

And this time, I saw another amazing work.

It is said that suffering makes heroes.

I'm in favor of that.

I think it was this news media's "trial" of Ye Yu that led him to write this "Trial".

When watching "Trial", my husband thought that Ye Yu was talking about the oppression of individuals by social forces, but I didn't think so.

In my opinion, Ye Yu may have been writing about this at first, but later, he was telling something more profound. Just like many great works, they originate from the author's own feelings, and ultimately transcend the author's own feelings.

In Ye Yu's writing, the pain of guilt is closely linked to the existence of the self. Guilt is individual, and it is only when the individual becomes aware of the existence of the self and begins to inquire about the meaning of its existence that it arises.

The arrest made K change from a person bound by his own identity, status, and other secular prohibitions to a free man who only cares about simple life and self.

His life became a cycle -- and the more he sought the true meaning of life, the deeper his guilt became, and the more he paid attention to life itself.

As long as klives as long as k's sin increases.

Therefore, once the trial begins, there must be guilt!

Why?

Because of reason.

As soon as reason works, sin breeds.

This kind of sin is not murder and robbery in the usual sense, but from the moment people are reminded of the crime, reason runs wildly, and all actions are tested in the way that people themselves think is right, and the sin spreads.

Human beings tend to overestimate their own invincible rationality, and use logical thinking to create a series of standards, norms and other normative things, in an attempt to bring the whole of human life and man himself into the castle of logic to be judged, and law or rights are one of these creations.

Each individual of human beings, at different levels, participates in the vast project of applying reason and creating so-called rules, in fact, he is creating his own crime, and the crime is committed by each individual, and the great human reason has been slow to realize this.

The situation and destiny of human beings are not determined by themselves, and are often shrouded in the order in which human creations operate themselves, and this abnormal state for individuals is actually a comical way out designed by human beings for themselves - only by being executed by human beings themselves can they truly get away with their crimes.

Therefore, although "Trial" is not over yet, the ending must be K's execution.

K racking his brains to find out what crime he has committed, trying to exonerate himself, and dying helplessly, are nothing more than criminals -- humorous or fables told to him by human beings themselves.

Of course, I'm not saying that Ye Yu is admitting the authenticity of cheats and ghostwriters. As I said earlier, the "sin" in "Judgment" is not "sin" in the usual sense. So, please don't take it out of context.

Because of the "trial" of the media, he began to write this novel, and finally transcended it and carried out a profound exploration of human free will.

This is my understanding of the Judgment.

This article, which appeared later in Xu Yishan, set off a huge wave among netizens as soon as it was issued.

is one of the top three writers in China, and they all think that "Trial" is a classic, but their views are completely different.

One thinks K is innocent, and the other thinks K is guilty (not "sin" in the usual sense); One believes that it is the oppression of individuals by social forces, and the other believes that it is the exploration of human free will; One thinks that Ye Yu is complaining about the "trial" of the media, and the other thinks that Ye Yu later detached from this.

The only thing that is the same is probably three things: first, K will eventually be executed; Second, support Ye Yu.

The ending is sad: "When I read the title, I thought it was Hei Yeyu's, but after reading the full text, I realized that it was Ye Yu's." However, I don't really understand what Professor Chen said~"

I say to you: "@结局哀伤, under the framework of the rules constructed by human beings themselves, no one can withstand the self-torture of reason. Thus, as soon as reason is at work, sin breeds. Professor Chen believes that Ye Yu has transcended the 'judgment' of the media and explored the free will of human beings, in short, he is exploring the relationship between man and the world. ”

Regional Boss: "Once the trial begins, there must be guilt." Although Mr. Xu and Professor Chen both think so, they have completely different views. Xu Lao thinks that it is because individuals are too helpless in the face of powerful social forces, like mayflies shaking trees, to put it simply, it is wronged, saying that you are guilty, you are guilty. Professor Chan believes that it is because no one can withstand the 'judgment' of their own reason, and once reason works, sin breeds. ”

Nianjun: "I rub it, I can't even read the comments, is it hopeless for me to go to see "Trial"?" ”

East, West, North and South: "Ye Yu, this is the rhythm of the leader of the literary world!" Awesome!!! ”