The Japanese girl who can serve people finally got into Mo Fei's bed, this has become her own woman, of course, she has to have the welfare of her own woman, at the premiere of "Soul Catcher", Honami appeared together with Mo Fei's arm, this is not to say anything to reporters, but to let others know that there is one more person in this small group.

Because there were some criticisms of this film in his previous life, when he wrote the script, he combined many film reviews from his previous life, and also consulted many mathematics professors, famous painters, historians, etc. from film universities, hoping to find a plot that satisfies no audience as much as possible and fits the plot of the filming.

Hard work will definitely pay off, but it took so much effort to get the script, and it has become more rational in terms of plot than the "Soul Catcher" in the previous life. But a movie can't really please everyone, and don't be targeted people, they won't be satisfied anyway.

Huang Qiusheng, who played the leading role for the first time in the film, performed quite excitingly, and he couldn't see the youthfulness of the newcomer at all. It can be said that at the beginning of the film, Ah Qiu played by Huang Qiusheng is an out-and-out bastard.

Yongjiang is indeed an excellent actor, he can take the third point of the murderous brain-eating demon Hannibal, and he can also perform Professor Lan, who loves talents and cherishes talents, to "just like his person". Yongjiang, who has a wide range of talents and knowledge, has a wonderful performance in the film. In other words, it's not much worse than Robin Williams, and even better than Williams in some ways.

The premiere of the film was undoubtedly a success, after the evening premiere on November 29. There was a film review early the next morning, and it was almost a clear praise, for such a movie, even the performance of newcomer Huang Qiusheng was remarkable, so it can only be praised.

"Oriental Daily" has always praised it, and the column film review also gave high praise: ""Soul Catcher" is undoubtedly a very successful movie, at least the author learned a lot in it. And the most impressive thing is what Professor Lan said to Ah Qiu: 'You're just a child, you don't know what you're talking about. So I ask you about art, and you might make a superficial argument in an art book. You know a lot about Michelangelo, his political zeal, his relationship with the pope, his love affair. You know him well, right? But you don't even know the smell of the Sistine Chapel, do you? You haven't tried to stand there. Look up at the famous paintings on the ceiling, right? Surely you haven't seen it, right? If I asked about women, you could tell me a lot of money, you may have been to bed a few times, but you can't tell me the true joy of waking up next to a woman. You are young and strong, and if I talk to you about war, you will throw Shakespeare at me and recite it, but you have never been in battle. I haven't tried to take my best friend's head into my arms and watch him take his last breath, stare at you, and ask you for help. I ask you what love is, you may only be able to play with the wind and the moon, but you have not tried to devote yourself to the heart of the heart, and understand each other's hearts when you look at each other, just like God arranged for an angel to come down to earth and dedicate you only to you, to save you from the abyss of hell, you have never tried to feel all kinds of care for her, you have never tried to stay committed to her deep love, knowing that she is terminally ill, you have never tried to lose a loved one......

So we should think more about what we have, what we have, what we can be proud of, and what will only make us look ignorant and stupid. We all laughed at the lady who wore all her jewelry, and now I look at myself and find myself alone as a child with all the toys in her hands, and I am obsessed with information but lose myself. We often talk about finance, discuss the construction of government, these very advanced topics, but we don't know how many people are struggling to survive on the land under our feet at the same time, we think we know politics very well, we know the environment we live in, but do we really understand? ”

Others, such as "Ming Pao" and so on, praised this movie, of course, some tabloid reporters still focused their firepower on Mo Fei and Honami after praising them indiscriminately, and even from the posture of the two holding hands, it was interpreted that their relationship was definitely not as simple as a boss and an actor.

Well, whether it's praise or digging up ** secrets, none of these have caused much shock. What really attracted the entire Hong Kong entertainment industry, and even most of the Hong Kong people, was the first and second two film reviews, which were published in "Sing Tao Daily" and "Ming Pao" respectively, or it can be said to be a battle.

The film review of "Sing Tao Daily" on November 30 criticized the movie "Soul Catcher", almost in a hysterical way, and almost pointed at the screenwriter to scold the idiot.

"First of all, it was the last movie I saw in November, and I bought a ticket to see the premiere, but after watching it, I regretted it, it was not worth the ticket price. I'm going to talk about this movie, let's call it 'movie' for the time being, I really can't find the right word.

The first point is that geniuses are too easy to make, one slap on the thigh and two slaps on the brain, a mathematical genius is born in the script. The second point is that a person who has won the international blood transfusion award, how can he be engaged in such a simple mathematical problem, and he has been doing it for two years, and he deserves to be humiliated by that hairy guy. It's really simple, Ah Qiu's answer, the first time he only used a few matrices to calculate the determinant, and the second time he only drew a few African mural style diagrams, which shocked Professor Lan. Matrices, determinants, this is the content of elementary advanced algebra, no matter how bad the mathematics education in the university is, it will not be regarded as a first-class achievement. The answers given by Ah Qiu in the film are often only two or three pages or half a blackboard. For modern mathematics, such a short solution is often not valuable, and some mathematicians often publish game theory papers of ten or twenty pages or more, and the game theory paper published by Nash in 1950 is thirty-two pages; So I have to talk to the screenwriter. The film must stand up to scrutiny.

The third point is that the movie really praises Ah Qiu, a genius, too highly. first brought out a great mathematician old man Lan, and then let the great mathematician prostrate in front of Ah Qiu's talent. Citizen scientists exist. Geniuses also exist, but gods like Ah Qiu do not exist. For the question of citizen scientists, Professor Lan gave the example of Einstein, if Einstein really saw Aqiu, he would also wipe his neck. The fourth point, and what is even more terrifying, is that the screenwriter not only made Ah Qiu proficient in mathematics. It is also necessary to make him familiar with history, chemistry, and to comment on fine arts. There is no shortage of professionals in the audience. Aren't you afraid of losing face by doing this, or are you ready to deceive the audience?

Seventh, I want to say that you don't want to be so arrogant as a screenwriter and show off what you don't understand. People must be self-aware. Point eighth. Freudian psychology, the human psyche must be traced back to the shadow of childhood, is too cliché. Setting a tragic childhood is actually to decriminalize Ah Qiu's evil deeds, so that the audience can morally recognize him. The ninth point, the part of Ah Qiu's transformation, is inexplicable. Repeating that it's not your fault can move Ah Qiu to a mess and erase the shadow of childhood. Poor Floyd. Coming as soon as it is called, it is going to go as soon as it is called. In the discussion of psychological issues. The film is just as unqualified as the psychology professor. A psychiatrist, a patient, two abused children hugging and crying. This scene is so idiotic that it is impossible to vulgarize and simplify psychology than this.

Then, I can't stand the deliberately sensational vulgar music in the film, too much plot can be expected, and some people praise this film, I personally think it's not up to par. ”

And the signed article on "Ming Pao" is even more gunpowdery, this comment was written by He Chaoqiong, and the battle is to support Mo Fei, and even the blind can see the pertinence.

"I've seen "Soul Catcher", this is one of the best movies I've ever seen, maybe some people will object, but this is my own understanding, others have no right and don't have to chirp. It really doesn't matter when you watch a movie, what matters is what you go to watch, whether it's a movie or something else, so I want to say a few words as well.

First of all, this is a movie, martial arts masters are too easy to make, gambling kings are too easy to make, mentally handicapped are too easy to make, everything is born in the script, what can't be born in the script?

Matrices and determinants can be used in subjects ranging from elementary advanced algebra to advanced physics, circuit differentiation, and more. The use of ternary matrices and multivariate matrices is by no means limited to solving a few equations. Instead of treating Qiu's matrices and sequences as first-class achievements, the professor can solve a complex problem in a simple and easy-to-understand way. Besides, the topic given by Professor Lan was meant to embarrass the students, you can say that he was just playing a trick, who said that it would take dozens of pages of paper to solve that question? Is Nash's game theory on the same level as a college professor's problem for a difficult student?

At the root of it all is that someone thinks too highly of genius, or too low. Not every professor is a genius, and not every genius can get ahead. In my opinion, Professor Lan is not so much worshipping Ah Qiu as cherishing him. Einstein's place in my mind is supreme, and it seems to me that if Aqiu's talent is not carefully pondered, it will be very early to form a theory.

I don't think there's anything wrong with Ah Qiu's erudition, people who are familiar with history, chemistry, and art can be found all around me. It's not about genius, it's just about interest. Moreover, with Ah Qiu's mind in the film, he has erudite capital.

Is it important for people to be self-aware? I agree! Maybe this is the arrogance of the script, maybe the script raises Ah Qiu too high, but if you look at such a film from a better angle, do you really know enough about the word self-knowledge?

Freudian psychology may seem cliché to some, but who in the world is completely free from childhood or psychology? As Professor Lan said: If I ask you about art, you may tell me about Michelangelo's life, his encounters, his revenge, and all his works, but you have never been to the Sistine Chapel, you have not looked up at the beautiful frescoes on the ceiling, do you think to some people that the concepts that people would normally talk about can be relegated to clichés......"

Since He Chaoqiong set his position, the tug-of-war of the Hong Kong media is about to begin....... )

Browse and read the address: