It sounds like two options, the problem is, you're only going to pick one, and at that time your adrenaline and your hormones are just going to make you hit back, not put up with it, the brain is substance, it's going to be affected by drugs, alcohol, dopamine, adrenaline, and other substances, making you think of what you should think of, do what you're supposed to do, and the "should" here It's an objective law, and you believe that you can make a choice after being beaten, or even you say that you can endure it, it can only mean that your hormone level is not enough or you are not strong enough. There is a good saying, alcohol strengthens people's courage, alcohol can change people's guts, people's thoughts, and the influence of alcohol on people is an objective law? So where is the subjective initiative, do you choose to get drunk or not when dealing with alcohol? Yes, this is an objective law that we are powerless to resist, so can bardoamine be resisted? Or are hormones resistant? Or is it resistant to physical damage to the brain? They will cause your behavior, shape your thoughts, and make your emotions, but you still think that you have a choice.

"Something is wrong, what can this do?"

In terms of strength, these people in the secret realm are lacking in training and influence, all relying on madness and a breath, charging into battle, once the technical competition is carried out, how to compare?

It was clear that the secret realm was not using even the slightest resource on these people.

There are no cultivation resources, which means that it is basically impossible to compete with earthlings in spell ability.

Although there are many people, well, many people are not terrible.

Of course, it's scary to have a lot of people!

It's all over the mountains and wilderness, and it's extremely terrifying.

A lot of people are already scared.

"Hurry up and open the door, I beg you. ”

There are already people who can't hold their breath anymore.

"Boom, boom. ”

The colorful spell energy emits various patterns and thin lines in the air, which is very beautiful.

Wang Jian suddenly shouted: "What are you kidding, these people are a group of cannon fodder, dig a ditch directly, long enough and deep enough, delay enough time, we are also home, what's the use of this, are you kidding, the ammunition is ......"

He suddenly realized, is this what the enemy is planning, first use these poor people who live to the extreme misery, and scare those rich second generations to carry out the ultimate output, wasting everyone's ammunition, and then the main force will appear.

But what else does it seem like you can do?

There is still a long way to go, these dozens of kilometers, he is not a great grandmaster like Long Yifei, nor is he a rich second generation like Lu Qingyi, he can run over quickly, he can only rely on his own strength to walk eleven roads.

It's time to speed things up.

However, just continue to charge, and it seems that everything is in chaos.

Judging from Wang Jian, everything is chaotic now.

Of course, these weak chickens of the mission have begun to use their own guys at the bottom of the box, instead of adapting to local conditions, using their own strengths, as a trump card to counterattack and delay the enemy's approach, a spell that changes the terrain is enough.

In this way, Long Yifei can only be forced to make a move, and this means that Long Yifei, the biggest reliance and hole card of the big guy, is about to enter the consumption, and it is meaningless consumption.

"Yifei, don't make a move, you can't ignore strategy for the sake of tactics!"

Strategy is the equivalent of "aiming at an enemy". Tactics are the equivalent of "shooting".

If you don't aim at the enemy, no amount of gunfire will destroy the enemy.

The role of strategy is to evaluate the value and lock in the direction.

The role of tactics is to follow the direction and execute it as best as possible.

If the strategy is wrong, then no amount of tactics can be saved. Every bullet gets hit where it shouldn't!

In the current situation, the strategy is to "go home", and the tactics are to block the enemy.

And the real enemies are those who are about to appear.

Although Wang Jian didn't understand why the enemy used these cannon fodder that was basically difficult to cause any results first.

If it is Wang Jian, what he has to do is very simple, attack at multiple points, attack the lone personnel of the mission on the side of the road everywhere, so that the mission personnel are scattered, after all, it is a distance of dozens of miles, and there are all kinds of traps, and it is not difficult to set traps.

The definition of strategy and tactics, strategy is the overall long-term program planning of using resources to achieve goals, and tactics is the local short-term planning and realization methods of using resources to achieve goals. The difference between strategy and tactics is the difference between the whole and the part, the long and the short, the abstract and the concrete.

Strategy and tactics are both means and plans for mobilizing resources to achieve goals, but tactics pursue life-and-death victory, while strategy pursues not temporary victories but a kind of equilibrium, and keeps the self in an advantageous position in the next equilibrium or equilibriums.

Strategy and tactics are a kind of calculation, are after many times of competition and games summed up lessons learned, but the strategic calculation is more long-term than tactics, the strategic pursuit is only a little better than the other side, which is also easy to accept, the opponent's counterattack prompts our countermeasures to promote their own progress, the two sides are also friends and enemies. It can be seen that the pattern of strategy is larger and more long-term than tactics, and strategy and tactics are not only the difference between the overall and partial games, but also the difference between the length of the game.

Strategic decision-making is to choose a good runway, and executive decision-making is to run at the best level on the selected runway. Strategic decisions cannot be considered separately from executive decisions, which are made to be successfully executed, and executive decisions are made to achieve the goals of strategic decisions.

The essence of strategy is to choose what to do, the focus is to choose the most important things that have a positive impact on the future, and every step of the future development will benefit from the choices of the present. That is, to have the ability to rank the things to be done in order of importance. Tactics are the ability to choose what to do and do specific things. That's understandable. Tactical success, strategic failure means that although things are done well, what is done is not the most critical and important. There should also be strategic thinking in daily life, and two small things should be used as examples. When I was in school, I wrote my classmates' class notes meticulously and neatly, and I did a lot of questions, so I worked very hard, but my academic performance never went up. It is often because although the student is meticulous, he does not like to think or is not good at thinking. Spend a lot of time doing the easiest things. I don't know how to practice deliberately, I only know how to do the workbook from beginning to end, I won't find my weak knowledge points if I don't review, and even the questions I do are within my own circle of ability, I don't summarize the rules, and I don't sort out the knowledge points I have mastered and have not mastered. Naturally, the efficiency is low.

And when raising children, for the problem of small children eating, establishing good eating habits is a strategy, and what to eat at each meal is a tactic. The child does not want to eat by himself so he chases after feeding, it seems that this meal has eaten a big bowl, but it is better to starve him once in a while, so that he knows that it is important to eat on time. This is how the child's physical fitness is distancing.

"Attach importance strategically and despise tactically" means that when things are ranked in importance, we must seriously think about and analyze them. When you decide what you want to do, you have to do it boldly. Even if you can't achieve the best results, as long as you do what you do is really a priority, only 80% of the way will not affect the overall situation.

Strategy is a game of Go, the layout of the overall situation, pay attention to the overall view and the overall situation, overcome the enemy with potential, and give full play to the highest efficiency of the overall situation.

Strategy is more like a chess game, which pays more attention to independent strategy games with competitors, and less involves strategy and layout.

In order to kill a group of cannon fodder and exhaust the strength of his most powerful Grand Master, it is almost impossible.

In order to accomplish something, it is necessary to have the right strategy and tactics to cooperate. Strategy is the goal of things. It is the principle that guides the overall situation, and all actions are carried out around the strategy, otherwise it is redundant and ineffective, and a waste of time and energy. Wang Yangming said that the key to life is determination. If you have no ambition, you will be confused and do nothing.

Tactics are the way to do things. Tactics are flexible, not static. Have different ways for different objects. It would be stupid to treat different people and things in the same simple and crude way. There are many kinds of people, things are difficult and easy, and in other words, specific problems are analyzed. It is necessary to solve the problem with an object-specific approach. The upright give with sincerity, the worldly with wealth, and the treacherous with respect. Complex things should spend more energy and time, and simple things should not be careless.

There are different tactics at different stages. It is important to know that things are developing, and doing things should also be done from the perspective of development. The thinking of carving a boat for a sword is mechanical, simple, and naïve. Before planning a thing, you must know how many stages there will be, use different tactics at different stages, always pay attention to the rhythm of the development and change of things, and change your thinking and practice in time.

Tactics can be advanced or retreated. Sometimes there is a tactical retreat in order to accomplish a strategic goal. Historically, the Red Army's Long March in the Fifth Anti-Encirclement and Suppression was a temporary tactical retreat, in order to preserve the vital forces and accomplish the revolutionary goals. If you blindly move forward, do not know the combination of advance and retreat, do not know the combination of work and rest, the impact is small, the result is half the effort, and the big one is a failure.

There is no strategy, only tactics, then one blow of energy, then decline, three and exhaustion, the front is strong, the rear is small, the tiger is overwhelmed, and the thing cannot be completed. If there is only strategy, not tactics, then it is always determined, not always determined. Any target is nothing more than an empty word, a fantasy, a joke.

Young people often start well and end well, which means that there is only strategy, no tactics, no practical methods to achieve the goal, or they are formulated and not seriously implemented, which also shows that the tactics are too high and unrealistic. This is the first case where it can't be done.

After entering middle age, they often go with the flow, follow the step-by-step, their physical fitness deteriorates, their ambition gradually wears off, and they have no strategic goals. At this time, although the wisdom of the mind has grown, and he can analyze and solve problems, he has no ambition. This is the case for most people in the workplace, who are confused and just earn food. This is another situation that cannot be done.

Those who have achieved things in ancient times are not only talented, but also have perseverance. The former is a practical and complete tactical approach, while the latter is a clear and firm strategic objective.

A clear understanding of the relationship between strategy and tactics is the embodiment of comprehensive dialectical materialism, which can be studied and mastered and gradually improved, and can be applied to practical work and life.

There is no good or evil in the world, until a person's own strength can not realize the personal interests he demands, people come out of the jungle-like primitive state, form a society, create the concept of "public interest", and realize the public interest through collective division of labor and cooperation, so as to indirectly realize the personal interests that cannot be achieved in the jungle age. Good and evil are not a natural existence, but a set of survival strategies evolved by human beings in order to maintain the order and efficiency of society, and to ensure that society fully realizes its function of "the whole is greater than the sum of its parts". At the same time, in order to ensure that this survival strategy is carried out, human beings have also invented social norms such as morality and law to deprive violators of their benefits (reputation, freedom, etc.), so that even if a person still only cares about his own interests, he will naturally do good and not evil, because evil (such as stealing) is no longer in his interest (because the benefits deprived by stealing are greater than the benefits obtained by stealing). As for what to do when personal interests and morality conflict with the subject's question, I personally think that it is difficult to answer this question "how". As mentioned above, social norms (including morality) operate by regulating personal interests, so even if you choose to give up the pursuit of immediate interests for the sake of morality, it is still in line with your best interests, because if you pursue them, the guilt you carry in your heart is also a kind of "disadvantage" (or "opportunity cost"), and when it is greater than the immediate benefit, you will not pursue it.

Good is good, and evil is evil. A good deed is a good deed, and an evil deed is an evil deed. People may do good deeds and do evil at the same time, making it difficult for people to distinguish between good and bad, but the standard of good and evil has never changed, only the set of standards set by people themselves. In a noble society that advocates benevolence and human character, you will provoke harsh criticism when you say a foul word. In a society where indulgence is celebrated and everyone follows their inner desires, it is normal for you to speak foul language, but if you are kind, you will provoke ridicule. In today's society, people are beginning to blur good and evil, saying "what is good, what is evil?", so everyone has their own set of standards. So it doesn't make sense for you to ask others such a question, everyone's standards are almost different, I believe that the subject you also have your own set of standards, and you have to act according to your own standards. If you want to know what level your behavior or standards are, whether they are good enough or not evil enough, then it is recommended that you align yourself with the highest and unchanging standard. Good is good, and evil is evil. Do not do any evil, but do all good.

If you like to fight in the wizarding world, please collect it: () Combat in the wizarding world is the fastest update.