"Oh? What do you mean? Wang's eyes moved slightly, and he asked. Pen % fun % Pavilion www.biquge.info

"Hehe......" Shuo just sneered: "Even if she is right, it is possible to catch something like garbage or treasure from the sea, and this has happened before......"

"However, I have never heard of this fishing, and you can catch 'a pair' of shoes!"

Shuo's tone is particularly focused on the word "pair".

Wang's eyes flashed suddenly, and he seemed to understand something.

And Su Qing was also stunned, and after a while, she smiled wryly and shook her head, not knowing what to say.

Yes...... No matter how much she tried to explain it, she couldn't explain the situation of a pair of shoes falling out.

No matter how much an ordinary person fishes, even if he really catches a sundrel like shoes, it can only be caught one by one, and it is impossible to catch a pair of leather shoes at once.

Because it is impossible for shoes to stick together, it is estimated that the two shoes were separated when they drifted with the tide in the sea, and it is impossible to drift together intimately all the time, right?

Moreover, even if it happened that the pair of shoes were together and were not washed away by the current, Su Qing couldn't explain the situation of two shoes caught with a fishing line......

Could it be that the line went through one shoe and was tied to the other?

It's impossible to think about it.

Su Qing sighed softly, now she is really speechless, Aya really jumped into the Yellow River and couldn't wash it off......

Did she say that because of certain rules, their fishing rods caught their shoes were in pairs?

Yes, that's right, it's a fact, if you use a fishing rod to catch shoes in the game, they are also a pair, and they can be worn directly on their bodies - the leather shoes they caught before are indeed a pair, and Su Qing definitely didn't say anything.

But who believes?

Thinking about it from another perspective, if Su Qing hadn't really experienced this situation herself, would she believe that someone could catch a pair of shoes at once?

Definitely not.

It is estimated that it will be like Shuo, mocking with disdain, "I can't even make up stories and brag." ”

Su Qing can only do the "last struggle", if they really don't believe it...... Then, Su Qing had no choice but to use force to accomplish her goals......

Sighing slightly in her heart, Su Qing tensed the muscles of her whole body slightly, is today's battle really inevitable......

"I see, that's ......" Wang also nodded in agreement, it really didn't think of Shuo before, but now that he thinks about it, there is really a problem.

It looked at Su Qing with a slight unfriendly feeling in its eyes: "Human, I didn't expect that I have always been kind and trusting to you, but you treat me as a fool?" Make up this clumsy excuse to lie to me? I don't know if you have anything else to quibble? If not, then please go back, we are not welcome in the undersea temple, humans like you are not welcome! ”

Wang obviously lost the mood to negotiate with Su Qing again, and his words also brought the obviously unfriendly word "quibble".

Su Qing had to smile bitterly, what should I do now?

Her mind kept turning, and if she could, she still didn't want to fight them with her sword, after all, as a human, after listening to Wang's words, she couldn't help but feel a little guilty about the Sea Clan, even if she was not a native of this world.

Anything else? Is there any other way to put this in the end?

Su Qing anxiously flipped through the memories in her mind, and suddenly, a story about philosophy, but which had been regarded as a joke by Su Qing, jumped into her eyes.

This story tells of a philosopher who was talking to a debater about something, and the philosopher suddenly took out a basketball from the side, held it in his hand, and asked the debater:

"I ask you, what do I have in my hands now?"

The debater was stunned, even if he didn't understand what the philosopher was buying, he still took his words and replied: "There's a basketball, what's wrong?" ”

The philosopher smiled slightly: "Okay, I said I don't have it on my hands, so please prove that I have a basketball in my hands." ”

The debater was even more puzzled: "How do you want me to prove it?" It's there, and the basketball is in your hands. I can see with the naked eye, I can shoot with a camera, I can record a video, aren't these the easiest means of proof? ”

The philosopher still smiled: "Yes, it's easy to prove that I have a basketball in my hand." ”

Then he threw the basketball on the ground and asked the debater, "Then let me ask you, what do I have in my hand now?" ”

The debater was already a little impatient at this moment: "Nothing? ”

The philosopher shook his head slightly: "No, I said I have a basketball in my hand, how do you prove that it doesn't?" ”

The debater was stunned.

He squinted, lowered his head and thought for a long time, and finally said in a tentative tone, "Because I didn't see the basketball in your hand." I can also use my camera to shoot it or I can record it, so you don't have a basketball in your hand. ”

The philosopher smiled and shook his head: "No, I said that the basketball in my hand is invisible and untouchable, you can't see it doesn't mean that you don't have it, and if you can't shoot it, it doesn't mean that you don't have it, I said that I have this thing in my hand, but only I can see it, except for me to explain this secret, no one can know that I have this ball in my hand." ”

"In that case, how do you prove that I don't have the ball in my hand? Thou art not me, and know that I do not know the joy of fish? ”

The debater was speechless.

This is the famous "proof of the devil", which is a trick often used in rhetoric and sophistry, which is intended to mean that "nothing can prove 'nothing'", that is, a person can easily prove that something has happened, or that something exists, because he just needs to find that thing, find the video of what happened.

However, he had no way of proving that something didn't exist, or that something hadn't happened.

Because no matter how far he argues his "nothingness", anyone who thinks that "there is" can say that that "thing" exists, but you haven't found it yet. So no matter how you try to prove "nothing", as long as the other party insists, it is almost impossible to make a logically complete proof.

It's like the famous crow paradox on Earth, where one person proposed that "all crows in the world are black." That is, "everything in the world that is not black is not a crow." ”

However, no one has been able to prove whether there really is no such thing as a crow that is neither black nor black.

Because even if thousands of crows are observed to be black, it does not prove that there is a white crow hiding in a cave that has not been discovered by humans.