Twice in a row to die of the same mistake, if it is not our IQ, there must be something wrong. Pen × fun × Pavilion www. ｂｉｑｕｇｅ。 info This problem can be a lack of clues, or it can be a wrong line of reasoning, and so on. However, at this point, I am more inclined to believe that the problem lies in the deviation of the guiding ideology.

Yang Gao has previously explained to me his thoughts, that is, the strength of the protagonist lies in the fact that he is in the routine. After several rounds of confrontation, I also admitted the correctness of this thinking. So, in the reasoning that followed, I naturally followed this idea and continued to go deeper. As far as the results are concerned, I did get quite a few answers. So in all fairness, I don't think what Yang Gao said was wrong. Guided by Yang Gao's statement, I tried to parse the whole event from the designer's point of view. In other words, what I'm looking for is an elegant and beautiful story. Because of this, a villain who is an enemy of the protagonist because of his inner perverted desires is unacceptable, and a villain who is purely evil and deserves no sympathy should not exist. It should be said that there is no problem with these conclusions, and it is indeed unlikely that there will be perverts who fight desperately for the sake of **** in this world, and it is unlikely that there will be villains who have no merit at all.

Here I just want to say that Yang Gao's view is true, but it is not the only one that is correct in this world. Since reality has proved that this kind of correctness does not work, we might as well try another correct one. In my case, the main reason why the protagonist is powerful and invincible is that there are thousands of people washing the floor for him. If a person is placed there, the merits and demerits of his life are always a fixed number. What is done is what is done, what is not done is what is not done, this is what has happened and will not change. However, this de facto establishment has no meaning in his image and evaluation. If the latecomer is sincere in wanting to blow or black, then he can always find a reason to blow and black. A person commits a sin, and it can be said that it is the only option under the circumstances; The meritorious deeds of a person can be said to be the result of the joint efforts of all people; Even, if a person does nothing, there are two understandings: "Taoguang is obscure and waits for the opportunity" and "watching the opportunity to make a profit". It is not my intention here to accuse such acts of confusing right and wrong by reversing black and white. It's just that since they do exist, they will indeed have power, and the protagonist has become invincible by relying on this power. With that said, the rest is easy to understand. As the protagonist is the longing and sustenance of tens of millions of people, there will naturally be tens of millions of people washing the floor for him. Childish actions are a sign of goodness in the heart, reckless decisions are made because of a firm belief in justice, and a low standard represents great potential and rapid growth, even the opening of a harem is a last resort - because he does not want to hurt anyone. In this way, the villains are faced with a protagonist who is kind-hearted, determined, has great potential and is growing rapidly, so naturally there is no reason to be undefeated.

Of course, there are two sides to things in the past, and if someone blows this protagonist, there will naturally be someone who will go black. It's just that no matter how these black people go to black, they will never stand in the position of villains. Although he will say something like "these villains are really pitiful", in fact, it is just ridicule in his heart. Further, even if this villain is quite successful, he has great personality charm and has a large number of loyal fans. However, in essence, these fans can only respect his personality, and absolutely cannot support his position. What's more, in this case, even the villain is portrayed so outstandingly, and the protagonist will most likely not look so unbearable. It's unrealistic to expect fans of these villains to hack the protagonists.

Compared with Yang Gao, my set of statements is undoubtedly not rigorous and convincing enough, and I can't pull out a solemn truth like him to support myself. However, I do not assume that there is a mistake in my statement. In fact, this kind of boundless mystical is also my creed. As an expert, I have a wealth of knowledge that is reliable and correct in my professional field, but other than that, it should be like. It's like a game of stepping on a manhole cover played by children, and they think that there are gold coins on the manhole cover, and this knowledge is okay for children, but this does not mean that there are gold coins on the manhole cover. In the same way, it is ridiculous and pointless to try to prove scientifically or philosophically that there is a gold coin on the manhole cover.

All in all, I tried so hard to find a new way. In Yang Gao's theory, the protagonist is strong because of the routine, so there is no way to defeat the protagonist in the routine. This sentence is not to say that the protagonist is invincible, its correctness lies in the fact that because he is in the routine, he is full of routines in his eyes, and every step he takes will fall into the calculation, so he will naturally fail. Because Yang Gao's theory has no way to point out the way to jump out of the routine, he is naturally correct in this category. And what I thought was pioneering was to find this method.

The power of the protagonist lies in washing the floor, so as long as he can come up with a high argument and refute this kind of washing the floor, then he can naturally defeat the protagonist. In other words, although the blowers can say that the sky is full of flowers, but the trolls can still spray to the point that they are worthless, this kind of thing is completely a test of the strength of both sides, and when it comes to strength, I am confident that at least it will not fall into disadvantage. In the case of Wang Zuo this time, according to the routine, he saved the three girls and opened the harem, and the matter itself is understandable as the protagonist. However, this understandable premise is that he lived up to his belief that no one was hurt. If everyone is happy and happy together, then many things will naturally become insignificant. However, the current situation is that not only someone was injured, but this person also died, and he died by Wang Zuo's side, and died in a place separated from happiness. That's right, this person is Li.

The only victim in the whole incident, Li. The reason why he died mysteriously was because he was overly sad after being ntr by Wang Zuo, ran to the Internet café and played Tetris for three days and three nights in a row, and finally returned to school and died suddenly from exhaustion.