"Lend me six hundred and fifty-eight dollars. Pen ~ Fun ~ Pavilion www.biquge.info"

When I returned to the dormitory, I turned on the computer and received such a message on QQ. The person who sent the message was Yang Gao, a good friend of mine from high school who is now studying in another city. Since he said this kind of thing to me, it means that I have retraced again. This is obviously true, as the subtle numbers that increase with each retracement also increase this time. But why? Obviously, I have survived this time, and it is clear that Wang Zuo has been stabbed to death by me.

It's a fact that I survived, and it's also a fact that I went back again, which means that the condition for me to end the rollback wasn't actually "survival", or rather, it wasn't just "survival". On top of this, there are certain additional conditions, such as letting Wang Zuo also survive? What the person who wrote the script really wants to see is a perfect goodend?

Wait, there's something wrong here. If the condition for me to end the rollback is a goodend that both Wang Zuo and I have survived, then what is the condition for Wang Zuo to end the rollback? Standing in his shoes, killing me and letting Ke-chan survive is already the best ending. And if that's the condition for him to end the rollback, then the two of us will have conflicting conditions. Further, no matter what action any one of us takes, one of us will eventually roll back, and the cycle of events will go on endlessly, and the entire course of human history will be stuck and stopped forever.

Anyway, that's. At the end of the day, just one person can pull back a time paradox. And if you change it to two people going back together like this, it will be the rhythm of your mother's explosion. No matter how whimsical the person who wrote the script was, it would have been too reckless to come up with such a premise.

Irritability spread in my chest, and I wanted to stand up and reprimand loudly, but there was no one to reprimand. The knowledge of experts tells me that as a person in the play, I can't question the idea of the screenwriter. If I think there's something wrong with him, it's because I'm not thinking too well to really understand his intentions. In the light of this principle, I revisit my previous thinking. The biggest problem with this script is that there are two people who can go back, among which Wang Zuo's backfile he said it himself, and my backfile is my own experience, looking at them separately, there is no doubt about their authenticity, and if combined...

Under the premise of the fact that Wang Zuo has already pulled back, the rollback I confirmed by relying on experience is not necessarily reliable!

After much thought, I came up with an amazing answer, and I couldn't find a reason to refute it. If I notice that the scenery around me is regressing, it is possible that I am moving forward, or it is possible that the scenery around me is indeed regressing. In the same way, I subjectively felt that the point of time had shifted to the past, and it could be that I had returned to the past, or it could be that the whole world had returned to the past. Wang Zuo read the file back to the past, only he retains the memory of the next period of time, and if I also retain this memory at this time, then as far as my subjective feelings are concerned, I am indeed reading the file again.

In other words, Wang Zuo is actually the only one who is pulling back, and I just happened to be aware of this. If that's the case, it's a good explanation of "why am I rolling back?" "That's the question. Wang Zuo is the protagonist's life, the chosen one, and it is not surprising that he will turn back. And as an expert, I somehow belong to the kind of person who "knows too much and will die sooner or later", and it is actually very strange to go back to the file for some reason. But if that's the case, it makes sense.

As for why I was able to perceive this, there is actually a good explanation for it - because of Yang Gao's point. The jokes that Yang Gao tells more than once are actually a kind of warning, which is the conclusion that has been reached. This warning reminds him of the calamity he is about to face, and this calamity is closely related to the calamity I am facing. Therefore, I became aware of Wang Zuo's murder of me, and this kind of thing makes sense. According to what Wang Zuo said, he has been back countless times before, and only these few times have I noticed, which also confirms this. At the same time, there is a reasonable explanation for why every retracement starts with a joke, and why there is a number in the joke that has been subtly increasing.

So, in the end, when it comes to the conditions for a restart, the answer is very natural. Although every rollback is marked by my death, in fact, Wang Zuo voluntarily dedicated himself to the Holy Grail in order to kill me, and after killing me again, he burned out. Therefore, the condition for the rollback has always been Wang Zuo's death, and this time I killed Wang Zuo and rolled back, which is a good illustration of this problem. Wang Zuo's killing of the Holy Grail was his voluntary choice, and it was his last move to kill me. However, after making this decision, it actually led to an ending that ended together. Ending up together means that Wang Zuo is dead, Wang Zuo's death means restarting, and re-filing means that all his previous efforts are in vain, so things are stuck. In my opinion, Wang Zuo couldn't think about it so much, and most of the time he had the idea of how to get the chestnut out of the fire from the Holy Grail.

At this point, the phenomenon and the explanation are so tightly aligned that I can basically claim that this is the correct solution.

So I gasped and couldn't help but feel a deep sense of despair. The reason why villains throughout the ages dare to be enemies of the protagonist is actually because he doesn't know that this enemy is the protagonist. Although such a villain dies stupidly, at least the mind is clear, and the whole process is neither fearful nor painful. And now, due to the fundamental opposition of positions, I have to face a protagonist with unlimited reading files in the face of my heart, which is just...

I hugged my head in pain, thought and thought, and finally decided to let him go.

If you have to go back, then it's okay for you to go back, and I can't stop it, can I? If you keep thinking like this, then it will continue to be like this, and if you want to open it, then we will continue to schem and continue to hurt each other. All in all, you go back to your file first, and I'll have to deal with some chores here.

If I'm not mistaken, Yang Gao's side is burning. I didn't have the time to do it before, but now there's no reason to ignore it. Moreover, I have a hunch that this matter is absolutely inseparable from Wang Zuo.