A newsreel that is 2 hours long. Pen & Fun & Pavilion www.biquge.info

From the arrival of the Fengchao experimental troops on the front line at Jiayuguan, to the assumption of the base station, to the process of commanding the UAV to annihilate the beta.

Thousands of betas, including 47 in the light class, were wiped out by 5,000 drones.

Although the cost of production of the drone was not disclosed, in an interview, the officer of the unit in charge of the official leak said: "The cost of the lost drone is less than a tactical aircraft." What's even more amazing is that because the drone unit is unmanned, there are zero casualties. ”

After this news documentary was released, it caused a sensation at home and abroad.

The domestic audience was surprised that China had invented such an advanced weapon, and it seemed that there was no similar one in other countries.

Abroad is surprised by the new idea of dealing with the light-level beta - low-flying drones!

However, how did China's drones manage to complete such a very complex task so intelligently? It is not difficult to make such a drone, the key is, the software and technical details behind it!

Otherwise, toys that can be remotely controlled are made by many industrial countries. However, ordinary ******** can only be remotely controlled by a single machine, and the distance is often only a few tens of meters. Beyond a few tens of meters, the remote control range is exceeded. At the same time, it is also doubtful that no one was seen on the battlefield with a remote control at all.

Even if some military experts guessed the principle of the Chinese UAV swarm, it is still difficult to copy it in the short term!

And the reason why the battlefield is advertised with great fanfare is because China has begun to build momentum and make new weapons such as drones and base stations to sell overseas.

At present, it is time to prove the value of this weapon by using drones in overseas battlefields, especially in the most popular European battlefields!

……

September 1981.

Because, the crosser's suggestion to the country - helicopter money to stimulate the economy!

"Helicopter money?" The No. 1 leader was surprised, "Wouldn't it be too simple if you could do a good job in the economy by throwing money around?" ”

"It's not like that!" Li Feng said, "We have studied that printing money and throwing money does not directly create productivity, nor does it generate new GDP!" When there is overproduction and overcapital, the effect of throwing money becomes weaker and weaker, and even has the opposite effect. However, when productivity is insufficient, consumption is insufficient, and people are eager to get rich, throwing money can activate everyone's enthusiasm for labor. To put it simply, the key to the virtual money thrown out by the state is to activate people's enthusiasm for labor and mobilize everyone to produce and innovate, so that the virtual can be turned into reality. ”

"I see!" Chief One nodded.

The so-called helicopter is a metaphor for throwing money. The original intention is to use fiscal deficits for monetary financing, which refers to the intervention method in which the central bank increases the base money supply and injects a large amount of liquidity into the market by purchasing medium and long-term bonds such as government bonds after implementing a zero-interest rate or near-zero interest rate policy, so as to encourage spending and borrowing.

In the source world, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan is the best at using helicopters to spill money to stimulate the US economy. His main achievement in office was to start the money printing press and save the American economy, which lasted until the collapse of the Soviet Union, and the United States suffered a huge dividend.

There are many failed stimulus policies, such as the helicopter dumping strategy (quantitative easing) in Japan and Europe, which are very bad and fail to activate the potential for economic growth. Because, Japan and Europe are taking quantitative easing at a time when their economies are very large, and helicopters are throwing money. But it is throwing more and more money, which will never be invested in industry, but will cause high prices and a bubble in the capital market.

The failed money-throwing strategy has made people reluctant to spend money because of the high price hike instead of enjoying the benefits of stimulating the economy.

If the goal of throwing money is wrong, it will become robbing the poor and helping the rich.

At present, China's helicopter money is not aimed at the capital market and a small number of people, but mainly at the broad masses of the people. For example, raising wages and welfare, encouraging more work, and so on, and putting more money into laborers, so as to stimulate the development of productive forces.

"Reform may not completely copy the pure exploitation model of Western countries......," Li Feng said, "Our country is very complicated, mainly because of the lack of capital, technology and incentives for talented people, which has led to problems." Incentives are not just a way to turn big bosses and major shareholders into rich people. It's not just the same pattern of eating a big pot of rice in the past, doing good and bad, it's all the same. There is also a model in which employees are relatively average and have to be accountable to the enterprise - for example, there is a company in Spain called the Mondragon model. ”

The Mondragon model is a cooperative in which its banks, enterprises, factories and farms are cooperative, first of all, the enterprise will educate its new employees, and only after the completion of education and re-education will the workers be allowed to join the cooperative.

Since the company has no major shareholders, all employees are partners and have decision-making power, and the vast majority of profits will be distributed to partners. In this way, the Mondragon model has successfully enabled the members of its cooperative to achieve the goal of common prosperity. There are no billionaires in the company as a whole, but tens of thousands of millionaires and multi-millionaires have been created.

Subsequently, companies such as Huaxi Village and Huawei emerged in China and adopted a similar mechanism. Of course, it's not as pure as Mondragon's model.

However, too much imitation of the Mondragon model is clearly dogmatic.

A simple imitation is that all employees can hold shares, and the Mondragon system is too complicated, and it is only known that it is a cooperative, and it can be common prosperity. But it is not a shareholding system, so Li Feng feels that the shareholding system is adopted, and all employees hold shares, and there are no particularly large shareholders.

At the very least, Huaxi Village's degraded version of the Mondragon model has achieved common prosperity for its villagers, exploiting migrant workers who are not registered as local villagers.

Huawei's model is a virtual share, which has the right to dividends but no real shareholder rights. However, Huawei's internal management is not a joint decision-making process for employees who hold virtual shares.

Under the Mondragon model, the members of the cooperative are basically equal within themselves, only the division of labor is different, and there is no difference in status, and the members are truly masters of the house and collectively vote to decide things.

Of course, it is said that this model has deteriorated later - that is, the overseas factories in Mondragon have also adopted an exploitative model, but that is for another time. Mondragon also developed to a great extent, driving a large number of partners to common prosperity, before it deteriorated. (To be continued.) )