Su Xiangliu looked at the map, and he now walked about 25 minutes to Litang Temple. Pen @ fun @ pavilion wWw. ｂｉｑUｇE。 info Litang is more than 4000 meters above sea level, the sun seems to be closer, the sun on the plateau is dazzling to make people feel dizzy, the color of the temple building is very bright, a large area of red, yellow, white, very beautiful, sometimes carved beams and painted pillars are colorful. However, this color is not lively, but a kind of alienation, and even a sense of desolation, as if the universe is desolate, and time is endless, making people feel that the vicissitudes of life are just a moment. When Su Xiangliu walked up, from time to time there were lamas roaring past him on motorcycles, and the red monk's robes fluttered in the wind, and the aura was very strong.

This time he went to the temple to get a thing, it was a pair of feet, don't get me wrong, this is not a human foot, but a foot that was made into a wax figure, this thing is passed down from generation to generation, but I don't know why when it came to the time of grandfather Su Anxin, it was obviously buried in the tomb, but it was recognized as stolen, and then I heard that it was collected by a collector, but there was a little accident, which caused the thing to disappear again, until not long ago, a person contacted him and gave him the address of the Horn Temple, and he found it here.

We live in the vast universe, the cosmic dust and the galaxy dust scattered in the sky, and we are even smaller than these. You are dragged into the abyss by disappointment, you are pulled closer to the grave by illness, you are trampled by frustration, you are ridiculed, ridiculed, hated, resented, and abandoned. We are all little stars. Su Xiangliu likes the word star very much, the universe is too mysterious, and it has an irresistible charm, so that Su Xiangliu has always had an indifferent attitude towards this journey.

Su Xiangliu came to the main hall of the famous Jokhang Temple, there is a pillar made of rosewood, due to the age, there are cracks from top to bottom on this pillar, and if you look closely, you can find that the cracks are inlaid with some white stone-like things. He was very curious about what this was, so Su Xiangliu wandered around and happened to meet an old monk.

At that time, the old monk was basking in the sun, so Su Xiangliu asked the old monk about the white stone, and the old monk looked at it and explained: "In fact, it is the teeth of the pilgrims who died on the way, those Tibetans who died of illness on the way and finally could not reach the holy land, their companions would knock out one of their teeth and bring it to the Buddha to fulfill their pilgrimage wishes." This is something Su Xiangliu didn't expect, and such perseverance is really shocking.

There was a bunch of people jumping in the distance, seeing Su Xiangliu's confused look, the old monk spoke again: "It's a debate" After hearing this, Su Xiangliu nodded, after all, he came here, of course he also mentioned that he had done some homework, and he also knew something about the debate, the debate generally starts at three o'clock, and many monks wear red robes and rush in. After a brief opening ceremony, the debate officially began, with dozens of lamas divided into various combinations of one-on-one, one-to-many, or many-to-one. Those who stand ask questions in Tibetan, and those who sit on the floor answer in Tibetan, and the debate covers various aspects of Tibetan Buddhism. As soon as a question arises, the seater must reply without thinking, refute or answer. As the debate progresses, the most distinctive images begin to emerge, with the standing person facing the other person, using a variety of gestures and rich body movements, and even glaring, waving a rosary, standing on one foot, and clapping his hands vigorously to make his voice stronger. They may raise their arms and slash down when they ask questions; Or pulling the beads means using the power of faith to overcome the other person.

It's a pity that most of the languages are incomprehensible, for example, Su Xiangliu can't stop understanding the content of the debate, but listening to the environment of short recitations and long chantings, low chanting and high singing. Su Xiangliu still likes the atmosphere here, and likes to see these devotees and lamas debating for the sacred faith in their hearts in the debate hall of ancient trees and rubble. It was the old monk on the side, seeing Su Xiangliu's appearance of a Han person, to a little bit of intimacy, and began to take the initiative to explain the content of their debate on the side, the debate is divided into two sides, the one on the left is the attacking room, the right is the defender, the old monk translates their dialogue, as for whether they can understand it, it depends on personal understanding.

Attacker: Is all impermanence perception?

Defender: Agreed.

Attacker: All impermanence is not awareness, because sound is impermanence and not perception.

Defender: Antecedents don't work.

Attacker: Sound, it should be impermanent, because it is the nature of the work.

Defender: No.

Attacker: Sound, it should be the nature of the action, because it is the Dharma that has been born.

Defender: No.

Attacker: Sound should be the Dharma that has been born, because it is the essence of color.

Defender: No.

Attacker: The sound should be the color aggregate, because it is the sound in the color aggregate.

Defender: No.

Attacker: The sound should be the sound in the color, because it is one with the sound.

Defender: No.

Attacker: The sound should be one with the sound, because it is based on the public assumption that it is one.

Defender: Agreed.

Attacker: Sound, should it be the sound in the color aggregate?

Defender: Agreed.

Attacker: Sound, should it be a color aggregate?

Defender: Agreed.

Attacker: Sound, should it be the Dharma that has already been born?

Defender: Agreed.

Attacker: Sound, should it be the nature of the work?

Defender: Agreed.

Attacker: Sound, it should be impermanent, because it is the nature of the work. Because it has been promised!

Note: Because it has been promised, it means that the defending party has agreed to this small premise.

Defender: Not repeatedly.

Attacker: All things that are done are impermanent, because * is synonymous with impermanence.

Defender: Not repeatedly.

Attacker: If the nature of the act is synonymous with impermanence, then everything that is done is pervasive due to impermanence, because according to the public assumption of the synonym.

Defender: Agreed.

Attacker: Sound, it should be the nature of the action, because it is the Dharma that has been born. Because it has been promised!

Defender: Not repeatedly.

Attacker: All the Dharma that has been born is the nature of doing and should be pervasive, because the Dharma that has been born is the definition of what is done.

Defender: Not repeatedly.

Attacker: If the Dharma that has been born is the definition of what has been done, then all the Dharma that has been born is the pervasiveness of what has been done, because it is based on the public assumption of the definition.

Defender: Agreed.

Attacker: Sound should be the Dharma that has been born, because it is the essence of color. Because it has been promised!

Defender: Not repeatedly.

Attacker: All the color aggregates are the birthed Dharma, because the color aggregates are part of the Dharma.

Defender: Not repeatedly.

Attacker: If the aggregates are part of the Dharma that has already been born, then all the aggregates of the colors are the Dharma that has already been born, because it depends on the public assumption of the part.

Defender: Agreed.

Attacker: The sound should be the color aggregate, because it is the sound in the color aggregate. Because it has been promised!

Defender: Not repeatedly.

Attacker: All the sounds in the color aggregates should be all over the color aggregates, because the * sound is a part of the color aggregates.

Defender: Not repeatedly.

Attacker: If the sound is the part of the color aggregate, then all the sounds in the color aggregate are all color aggregates, because according to the public assumption of the part.

Defender: Agreed.

Attacker: The sound should be the sound in the color, because it is one with the sound. Because it has been promised!

Defender: Not repeatedly.

Attacker: Whatever is one with the sound, it is the sound in the color aggregate that should be everywhere, because it is based on the public assumption of synonyms.

Defender: Agreed.

Attacker: Doing should be synonymous with impermanence, because the Dharma says that impermanence is synonymous with doing.

Defender: Agreed.

a* Attacker: The Dharma that has been born should be the definition of the nature of doing, because the Dharma says: The definition of the nature of action is the Dharma of having been born.

Defender: Agreed.

b* Attacker: The color aggregate should be the part of the dharma that has been born, because it is the color aggregate in the dharma that has already been born.

Defender: No.

Attacker: The aggregates of color should be the aggregates of color in the Dharma that have already been born, because they are one with the aggregates of color.

Defender: No.

Attacker: The color aggregate should be one with the color aggregate, because it is based on the public assumption that it is one.

Defender: Agreed.

Attacker: Should the aggregates be part of the Dharma that has already been born?

Defender: Agreed.

c* Attacker: The sound should be the part of the color aggregate, because it is the outer color of the part of the color aggregate.

Defender: No.

Attacker: The sound should be the outer color in the part of the color, because it is the sound in the outer color.

Defender: No.

Attacker: The sound should be the sound in the outer color, because it is the same as the sound.

Defender: No.

Attacker: The sound should be one with the sound, because it is based on the public assumption that it is one.

Defender: Agreed.

Attacker: Should sound be part of the color?

Defender: Agreed.

Attacker: Is everything that is one with sound the sound in the color aggregate?

Defender: Agreed.

Attacker: Is all the sound in the color aggregate a color aggregate?

Defender: Agreed.

Attacker: Is all the color aggregate a given birth?

Defender: Agreed.

Attacker: Is all the Dharma that has been born a nature of action?

Defender: Agreed.

Attacker: Is everything that is done impermanent?

Defender: Agreed. (The above is the premise of the second round of establishment)

Attacker: Sound, it should be impermanent, because it is the nature of the work. Because it has been promised! Weeks have been promised!

Explanation: Thoughtful has been promised, which means that the defender has agreed to this premise.

Defender: Agree is a second-round inference of the previous proposition, and this is the case below

Attacker: All impermanence is not awareness, because sound is impermanence and not perception. The antecedents have been promised!

Defender: The aftermath is not successful.

2 Attacker: Sound, it should not be perception, because it is the color of the essence. Because it has been promised!

Defender: Not repeatedly. The first round was established before the second round, and the second round is now tested

Attacker: [All aggregates of color are not perceptions] should be pervasive, because * aggregates of colors are contrary to perception.

Defender: Not repeatedly.

Attacker: If the aggregates of color are contrary to perception, then all aggregates of color are not perceptions, because they are based on contradictory assumptions.

Defender: Agreed.

Defender: No.

Attacker: The color aggregate should be the color aggregate that is contrary to perception, because it is one with the color aggregate.

Defender: No.

Attacker: The color aggregate should be one with the color aggregate, because it is based on the public assumption that it is one.

Defender: Agreed.

Attacker: Is it contrary to perception?

Defender: Agreed.

Attacker: Isn't all color aggregates perception?

Defender: Agreed.

Attacker: Sound, it should not be perception, because it is the essence of color. Because it has been promised! Weeks have been promised!

Defender: Agreed

Attacker: All impermanence is not awareness, because sound is impermanence and not perception. Because it has been promised!

Defender: Agreed.

Attacker: It's over!

The old monk is a well-organized translator, but poor Su Xiangliu doesn't know anything except for the attacker and the defender. Looking at the old monk looking at him expectantly, Su Xiangliu felt that it was not polite not to say anything, so he slowly spoke: "Why are they applauding? Is it because it's a good story, or is it a dance, I counted, and they played more than forty chapters in total."

(To be continued.) )