After being swept away by his car, my horse also took the opportunity to jump out, and with the help of the front horse and the rear gun, the car that was already on the clear road, frantically pounced.

At this time, I finally determined that this traitor was definitely not an undercover agent, because I saw a very sinister smile on his face, as if he was a hungry wolf, and saw the little lamb rushing to his wolf's den desperately.

But his sinister smile soon faded away, for my chariots and cannons were not at all indifferent to the old men in his well-guarded Nine Palaces, but were full of great interest in the small soldiers in the row of soldiers, and the lambs began to ravage the crops that were weaker than them, the little soldiers of the opponents who stood in a row to be slaughtered.

Of course, some soldiers are guarded by horses, so the death squad is the vanguard, or the cannon, or the horse rushes up to a horse that has a guard task with the opponent, and then continues to pack up the small soldiers in a relaxed and comfortable way.

I can already see that the people in front of the big screen at the door are starting to despise me:

"What kind of chess did this person take, it was already a little bit of a reversal when the back hand was like this, but if you redeem it like this, that advantage will be gone."

"What kind of chess is this?! Like a beginner, how do you catch what you eat? Don't let go of training small soldiers, don't you know all the most basic killing soldiers? Could it be the reincarnation of a starving ghost? ”

"Huh? What the? Am I not mistaken? In order to eat a small soldier, he actually exchanged a maxima that had already pounced on the opponent's position for a lame horse of the opponent? Is this going crazy rhythm? ”

"What do you have to be crazy, this is simply death! NOzuoNOdie。 ”

In fact, this is also a commonly used routine by people, called winning chess without making trouble, for example, many times there will be a situation where one side has more sons and one side has the momentum, here is not only the side with fewer children wants to quickly attack the opponent to win the opponent, but also a kind of inhibition of the opponent's attack.

In addition, it is also a kind of cooperation of multiple sub-parties, as long as the opponent is not going to go into an unpreventable lore, his side will generally not choose to fight with the opponent in an offensive situation, in that case, it is basically to give the opponent a similar opportunity to grab speed with himself.

The speed will generally be a little slower for the side with many pieces, because the so-called multiple sons are to eat one more piece of the opponent, as long as this piece is not eaten with the general's steps, it must be a waste of a number of moves, so than the speed, theoretically it should be a move slower than the side with many pieces.

And if you attack, one more and more killing, one less and one less attack, not necessarily someone has one less than you, and there will be no way to take your veteran.

Therefore, it is safer for the side with many sons to do so, that is, if there is no big chance after getting a child, they will generally retreat to prevent the party with fewer sons from jumping off the wall in a hurry, playing with their lives, and resisting the opponent's life-fighting attack, and the opponent is at least defeated in momentum.

In addition, either the sub is exchanged, or the catch, the opponent's sub force is pressed back, and the next attack with poor psychological quality is generally collapsed in one attack.

Even if the opponent can stubbornly hold the first wave of attack, don't be anxious, take a closer look, the opponent can defend the attack of his own side with many sons in the case of fewer sons, there must be a son, such as fishing horses both guard the bottom line and the bottom corner, and also guard the position of their own middle soldiers.

Or two subs, such as a load cannon, blocked their two cars, or the cannon guarded their fishing horses, so that their guns or cars could not enter the bottom.

One or two of them here is equivalent to the load-bearing wall of the building, as long as this load-bearing wall is broken, or the load-bearing wall of the opponent is exchanged for the strength of the opponent, then the collapse of the opponent's defense line is just around the corner.

Duozi defends first and then gradually advances, and finally crushes the opponent, although it seems a little cowardly, but this is the so-called winning chess without making trouble.

In my case, it is not only possible to win chess, but also to draw, which increases the possibilities.

First of all, if you want to win chess, in addition to having a little better than the opponent's level, you also need a lot of luck, all of which are indispensable, there are many recognized masters, and there are also times when the boat overturns in the gutter and is overturned by a little-known hairy boy, this is luck.

The way to eliminate luck is probability, so if that hairy boy plays a few more games with this big master, who will win the most? The answer is that anyone can say with great certainty.

The element of luck can also be controlled, that is, the first precept of the Ten Commandments of Chess - no greed for winning, and more than 90% of the reason for being overturned is because of the mentality of the big master who is bent on winning, and feels that if he is forced to make peace by this little-known hairy boy, he will lose the face of his big master, so he should be in harmony and force the so-called victory.

With this mentality, when people redeem their children, they first subconsciously retreat, and as a result, after the good position is grabbed by the opponent, they can't ask for it anymore.

In addition, the meaning of not being greedy for winning is not that you don't want to win, you have to win when you should win, but you still have to play when you should draw, and the key one is that you can't be greedy.

In fact, not only can you not be greedy for victory, but also can not be greedy for chess, there are many times, the last game happened to meet your most powerful opponent, obviously you can defend the championship with chess, and the strength of the opponent is not stronger than yourself, because after all, you are the defending champion, but you still can't make peace with yourself, why?

is still a sub-greed, here is greed for chess, because chess is victory, in the final analysis, it is still greed to win, because the risk of winning chess is far greater than the risk of chess, so I don't want to attack, I want to defend, fight positional warfare, thinking that defense is victory.

But the target is 10,000, often only 8,000, and when many people reach a certain level, they will have my original concept, that is, it is difficult to win all the defenses, is this really the case? Of course, until that level, I always thought that the attack would be able to win the whole defense.

But if you go a step further at that certain level, you will feel that the full defense may not be able to defend the full attack, but it is just a matter of needing a different way of thinking.

That is, when the strength of the sub is equal, one side is fully pressed to attack, one side is fully retreating and defending, and it is generally difficult for the attacking side to open the situation, threatening the opponent's veteran, forming a stalemate situation.

In this case, it seems that the defender is in danger, but there is still a chance, and if the opponent presses all the forces of the attack, the rear will definitely be empty, and the defensive counterattack may be won in one fell swoop. (To be continued.) )