Chapter 1: I'm a wild chess player

As a person who loves chess, whenever we play chess or watch others play chess, we can be enthusiastic, eager to try, go deep into it, enjoy ourselves, or regret not being at the beginning, or sigh regretfully, and all kinds of emotions can not be experienced by chess friends.

Here, I would like to advocate that the majority of chess players who like chess, for the sake of our common love of chess, for their own ability to reach a higher level or realm. Briefly talk about your own suggestions, of course, a person's vision is inevitably limited, I hope everyone will work together, do not hesitate to give advice or supplements.

First of all, when playing chess, we must have the domineering spirit of the world, no matter what the opponent is the champion or what the master, of course, the level is high and low, but the chess quality is not high. Don't give up unless you reach a draw in a timed endgame. This is the constant motivation for us to improve our chess level. I believe that anyone who basically plays chess to a certain level can do it, which should be the main reason why they can reach a certain level.

Secondly, respect even a chess player who is temporarily better than you, after all, at least he can represent your current goal or your next level of chess. Unless it's time to fight, then please let go of the so-called awe and let go of the fight.

Finally, when you are already at a level that is more than the majority of the players, please respect your fellow chess players who are below you or much lower than you. First of all, what level did you come from, didn't you? It's just that everyone has a different perception of chess, and the speed of progress is different. But this is also time-based, isn't it? Can you guarantee that people will always make slow progress? Or can you guarantee that your progress won't slow down? Even if you don't talk about the level of chess ability, even if you become the first chess player, you still need a good chess atmosphere to make you shine, right? What gave me the deepest impression was that when I was in middle school, since I stood still and played table tennis with people, people stopped playing table tennis with me. Chess means that when I first started as a classmate, I could play a few games, and after understanding my level, I begged him not to play chess with me...... I believe that such a simple truth is needless to say for those who can play chess.

I don't need to say more about the history of chess, my experience of chess has made me willing to share it with others. After a year, I went to my second aunt's house to visit relatives, and met my second aunt's niece and her son also went to his house to play, his niece's surname is Mei, a very poetic surname, I usually call her Sister Mei. When she saw me and said, "My son has been learning chess for several years, you can play chess with him, I heard that you are very good at chess." I used to be relatively idle when I first graduated, and I used to go down from the west end of the street that runs through the city at the entrance of my community to the east end, and it was a relatively brilliant experience to go down to the chess stalls on the side of the road. His son called me uncle, and I called him Xiao Luan, and so began a horrific massacre...... At the beginning, I said that I was going to eat your car, and I was going to smoke your horse, and within a few minutes I immediately shut up, and I guess my expression at that time was much more worried than when I encountered the most difficult math problem in school. Since then, there has been an extra pair of chess players at the entrance of the community. One is me, a person who is already thirty years old, and a junior high school student who is twelve or thirteen, called my uncle's Xiaoluan. What's even more tragic is that I, a chess player who thought I was a good chess player, was killed for a long time and had no way to fight back. If you add in the praise (which must have nothing to do with me) or ridicule from the onlookers, I still think about it and admire my courage and perseverance at that time. It was a strange game, it was easy for me and it was easy to have an advantage, but it was always one step away from winning, and then the situation was reversed and there was no doubt about it. After a summer vacation that felt dark to me. I'm a wild chess player who can finally compete with my nephew. Speaking of which, there may be many people who value success or failure who can't help but say, aren't you just a stinky chess basket, and you are embarrassed to say what kind of chess? Okay, I'll just briefly explain that some people may know that it is an explanation, but that's not the most important thing. I have never studied chess systematically since I was a child, and I have never read a single chess book. My nephew has been studying under the provincial individual championship and entered the top 10, which should be regarded as a famous teacher, for several years. He was already studying in elementary school, and he was in the second year of junior high school. And after a summer vacation with me, he participated in the provincial chess level tournament during the National Day, and was mistakenly classified into the 14-16-year-old group A at the age of 12, and still won the first place in the first group of the first group. How many wild players who have not been systematically studied can cut the first place in the junior group A of the provincial chess level competition?

Here, I will be bold and fallacious about the strengths and weaknesses of wild chess players and chess players who have systematically studied chess (let's call them technical flow chess players). First of all, I am a wild road chess player, the only benefit of learning chess without a system, maybe is the freedom of thinking, imaginative, unrestricted, of course, there will be chaos of branches and leaves, it is undeniable that the offensive chess of the wild road is more spiritual, if it can be combined with coherence, it should be able to fight with the technical flow chess player. The disadvantage is that the defensive ability is relatively poor, and many wild players are attacking first, and when they are attacking, they are secretly killed by people with dark arrows. And in my experience, it's hard to win all in chess alone, unless there is a lot of difference in level. So when attacking, you still need to cooperate with the defense.

As for the technical flow, chess moves are generally both offensive and defensive, and in addition to the basic killing method and the exquisite killing method in the complex upgrade endgame, the attack ability still depends on their own understanding, and the defensive kung fu is generally not bad. It may be that my understanding is inevitably biased, but I always feel that systematically learning the basic killing methods of chess, fixing the disabled, opening, mid-game tactics, and endgame tactics is necessary to become a master, but not everyone can become a master after the systematic experience. After learning the system, it must be a master who can still attack without restrictions, but the results of defensive sophistication and weak attack may not be much better, after all, it is necessary to attack to win chess.

In reality, when I was playing chess with my nephew, many times I was in a situation of great superiority, which made him fall into contemplation every time, but I was always one step away from the final lore, and fell into a vicious circle of only blossoming but not fruiting. But when the situation reversed, and it was his turn to attack and defend, it was like boiling water pouring ice, and the defeat was swift and unresistible. If you divide chess into the opening, the middle game, and the endgame, that is, if I don't hit the flying knife at the beginning, it is equal, and I am less excellent in the middle game, and the middle game of the general wild players will not be bad, but my endgame is much worse, of course, the difference is also the ability to defend. Compared to the technical players, the endgame is basically not much worse, and the defense is not bad, and the mid-game ability may be what they have been pursuing.

As a wild chess player, I believe that many people play chess with some people, heartily and bravely. But when I meet some people, I am tied up and can't play at all. This is where the start of restraint comes in. But that's not the most important thing. The most terrible thing is that you can't get out of the endgame when it comes to lore, but you are killed by others. Ao, and the name of each move of chess, it is estimated that you can't call it if you haven't learned, here by the way, there are a total of 9 vertical lines on the chessboard from right to left, which are called 1-9 roads. There are a total of 10 horizontal lines. The way of the car artillery commander is the same, the car is flat from road A to road B to call a car flat B, advance to the opponent's camp on road A and call a car A to enter B, and retreat to their side on road A to call a car A to retreat B. Ma Shixiang's way of moving is the same, the horse to the opponent's camp called in, to their own direction called retreat, from Road A to the opponent's camp, to Road B to call Ma A into B, from Road A to their own camp, to Road B to call Ma A to retreat B, as for the specific range of activities and movement of the car and horse artillery generals, there is no need to go into detail, I believe that as long as you play chess, you must understand this first.

For example, the following endgame is a bit difficult for the average wild player. But that's not a problem for the average technical streamer.

In this endgame, I won't win when I have rushed to the fourth level of the QQ game chess strength test, and I lost like this. In this way, the remnant should be, 1, the front rook is flat 6, and the cannon 2 is flat 4;

2, the car 4 into 2, will 4 into 1;

3, rook 5 draws 4, Black loses

But this is just a variation of the first basic kill, and the trick is something that a skilled player has to learn from the beginning. There was also an endgame about a high hanging horse or a side tiger that could have been won, and I lost, and lost many times, until my nephew won it once, and I didn't know that I had won that way. I'll show you.

1, the car 7 into 1, will be 4 into 1, I always thought that only the car flat to the 8 or 9 road back car general can be killed

2, the car 7 flat 6, the black negative turned out to be detained here

In the same way, if the black car does not look at the horse, and the black cannon is prevented from buckling on his 6th or 7th, 8th, and 9th lines, the red car can be leveled to 8 or 9, and the general will be killed. That is to say, there are two routes for the combination of chariots and horses of high-hanging horses.

This should be the endgame killing method that wild chess players lack. Of course, there are still a lot of fixed disabilities, such as single phase guard and single horse, single soldier guard and single soldier, soldier elephant full guard and horse single soldier, car victory single lack of soldiers, etc.

Theoretically, if a player with a skill stream doesn't become a professional player or is trained by a famous teacher, it's basically a way to start the endgame and strengthen the middle game, I think. Wild chess players should generally be older, because if they have not been systematically studied, it will take a long time to think of a certain level of fighting purely in the middle game. It's about a young man. If you have a good middle game, and then systematically learn the opening and endgame, the opening endgame is good relative to the technical flow, but if you want to keep strengthening the middle game, what can you achieve at the same level? I feel that although there is a certain training method at the level of the middle game, the key is actual combat, compared to the beginning endgame that can be systematically learned in childhood, the ability to play in the middle game can be described as an antelope hanging horns, and there is no trace of it. So I assert that in the end, it should be the wild chess player who is superior. Of course, there are also various specific situations, and I encourage all kinds of wild players here.