Later, he was the principal, and the teaching was a mess, and even his students did not follow his teachings.

"On War" is not for commanders, it is for kings and scholars, the same as "The Art of War", but the logical and strategic perspective is much worse than "The Art of War".

Sun Wu is a general, when he did the thirteen articles, he summarized Sima Fa and the military strategy of the countries, he had not fought a big battle at that time, but he was the commander when he destroyed Chu, Wu Zixu was the chief of staff, theory is linked to practice, practice is the only criterion for testing the truth, and the results of practice are placed there, clear.

Sun Wuzi's military science has created an era, the logic is very clear, the bones are distinct, the upper middle and the lower are layered, that is the system, not a bunch of fragments that are taken for granted.

The theory of war is much worse than the theory of sea power, and the theory of sea power is the real Anglo-American strategic thinking.

There are too many subjective things in "On War", and Napoleon's things are changed and added with some political and philosophical thinking, and the simple Napoleonic bones are expanded to hundreds of thousands of words, and he has become a big fat man.

What war is nothing more than the continuation of politics through another means, war is the continuation of politics, this is emptiness is color is emptiness, politics is still the continuation of war, because Versailles, so the Nazis came to power, proof can be proved, in fact it is a pile of fragments, the same as neurosis.

Not to mention the tactical-level things in it, the key is the tactics of subjective imagination, which is not a tactic obtained from actual experience, and this kind of thing can be regarded as a classic in the Western military field, precisely because it is not military, it is a military religion.

The West lacks this perspective, and the logic of Frontinus's "Strategy" is clearer than that of "On War". You can only believe in Jesus or you don't believe, and if you can't believe it, you don't believe it. It is not easy to come up with a perspective like Sun Wuzi, with a bit of oriental thinking, and a different kind of exotic style.

In terms of structure, Western military science was played by Napoleon, and the real bone of Western military science, Jomini can be further improved according to Napoleon's coming, and another military science master has come out. Clausewitz came out according to Napoleon's coming, and the military big fool came out. Mahan's father and old Mahan came according to Napoleon's set, West Point had something to teach, and little Mahan's trilogy on sea power came out.

The skin is different, the sea and land are different, and the appearance is different, but the structure is still Napoleon's, and even the Prussian General Staff system is all learned by Scharnhorst from Napoleon's chief of staff Berthiena, and the blitzkrieg from the battle to the armored platoon charge is a V-shaped tribute to Napoleon, what Soviet theory of great depth, isn't it still Napoleon's structure.

Concentrate superior forces to fight a war of annihilation, the principle of movement warfare, this is Jomini, this is Napoleon.

Moltke has a V, Schlieffen plans to light the south and heavy to the north, Japan has a V, Manstein plans to have a right hook is V, Schwarzkopf has a left hook in the Gulf War or a V, flank slash, centripetal assault, all Napoleon's set.

On the contrary, France lost Napoleon's bones, and since Foch, it has been fascinated by the idealism in "On War", lost in the appearance, Prussia fried stars and even engaged in strategic deception in military thought, but what he learned was Napoleon's bones, which was not simple at all, and the inheritance was brought to Tsarist Russia by Jomini.

China is surrounded by the countryside and the city, the Soviet Union is surrounded by a large depth and synthetic, the theory of sea power is to encircle the island of the world, the US artillery is scattered and the artillery positions are concentrated for attack, multiple satellites are digitized, the strategic and tactical appearance is changing, and what remains unchanged is the structure, this is Jomini, this is Napoleon.

Island jumping and frog jumping are the same structure, but one is a boat, the other is a helicopter, the essence is the same, the Inchon landing is the landing version of the flank truncation tactic, the bones of military science are the most important, the skin doesn't matter, that one changes quickly.

The French just lost their bones, abandoned the Napoleonic system, and regarded strategy as a philosophy, and as soon as their thinking diverged, it became a collision of fragments and fragments, and there was no system. If they think that torpedo boats are good, they will engage torpedo boats to replace the big ships, and they will go to whatever country in Africa has problems, but there is no overall strategy.

One of the Western strategies is the Napoleonic system, the theory of victory, and the theory of annihilation, and Russia and Germany are this set. One is the Anglo-American system, the theory of checks and balances, and the theory of encirclement, which is the Anglo-American system. The Japanese Army is the Napoleonic system, and the Anglo-American system of the Japanese Navy is the Anglo-American system, and a big reason for the conflict is the difference in strategic views.

The study of Chinese campaigns is the Russian style of the Napoleonic system, the study of tactics is the fusion of Russia and Japan, the concept of strategy is the theory of Mao's people's war, and the theory of strategy has been added to Ma Zhe and Mao's theory, and it has become a political and military strategy science like political economy, and it has become Orientalized.

After the reform and opening up, as soon as the atmosphere of collectivism disappeared, the theory of people's war was weakened, and the general outline of the guiding concept of strategy was lost.

Take strategic deterrence as an example, first, you have to have power. Second, you need to convince the person you are intimidating that you have the power. Third, you need to convince the person you are intimidating that you will use this power. The three elements are simple, and there is no need to write a thesis.

With a punch, the source of strength is the waist, it turns out that this waist is the people, and later this waist becomes the government, Chinese strategy is originally political and military strategy, the source of power changes and the structure changes, plus a bunch of fragments, the east is not the east and the west is not the west, and the four are not like it.

In the 80s and 90s, domestic color TVs played foreign color TVs, which was the old strategy of the countryside surrounding the cities, and the source of strength was the people and nationalism. Huawei has gone all the way up from the local telecommunications bureau to public relations, and it is still a situation where the countryside surrounds the city. The Confucius Institute after a thousand years is the new strategy, which has become government-led, the structure has changed, and the strategy has changed completely.

It is impossible to stop the infiltration of Western values, and the problem of strategic structure lies here.

The father of modern military science is Napoleon, he introduced geometry and water potential into Western military science, hiding needles in the cotton, living water is not dead, from strategy to tactics are all this set, the real successor is Jomini, Jomini Napoleon's set of play alive, these two goods are all living water, this is Oriental thinking, this is called Sun Wuzi, this is called the chairman.

It is possible to use the structure of the nomadic people's tactics of several thousand years to use the enemy to advance and retreat, the enemy to station and disturb us, the enemy to fight when the enemy is tired, and the enemy to retreat and pursue me, and it can be done in 16 words, so as to facilitate the transmission and popularization to the vast grassroots level where the culture is not high.

Strategists summarize the structure, write history and summarize the appearance, and the economics and finance textbooks in the West are the same as those in the East, and they are also stacked with appearances. On the contrary, the context of management is clear, it is rules and regulations and methodology, it is a case, it is experience, and it is a real thing. It's like the regulations on the Eastern Army, it's a case, it's an experience, it's a bloody lesson, it's a real thing.

Holding a steel knife of ninety-nine, kill all Hu Erfang and stop. Those who can play nursery rhymes are the top strategists of ancient China, and even Goebbels has the position.

If you want to get rich, plant trees first, have fewer children and raise more pigs. Study hard and make progress every day. This is called the top-level consciousness-form cultivation technique, and this is the real master of propaganda.

We want to promote... Implement... Inherit... Aggressive... Safe... Significant... Spirit... Profound... Learn... Understand... That's a good point, there's nothing wrong with it except that I can't remember.

There are a thousand Hamlets in the eyes of a thousand readers, and there are 100,000 traditions and styles in the eyes of a hundred thousand people. You guess? Guess again?

It is called wisdom to simplify complex things.

You can complicate simple things, which is called pretending to be smart.

Earlier, there was a lack of vines to grasp the ground, a lack of cadres, the general culture at the grassroots level was not high, and the standardization of speeches and official documents was an advanced, otherwise there was no unified format for the review of official documents.

In the 21st century, this is not advanced, and if it leaves the scope of administrative standardization, it will be transformed into a disadvantage.

One TV broadcasts the leader to say a few words, and the other TV shows Michael Jackson simply jumping twice, affirming that the former is more eye-catching, because the report will definitely sing the praises of virtue, as for the real situation, it doesn't matter.

The roots of Chinese culture are in the folk, and the flesh and skin are all in the folk. The government's behavior is to engage in culture, just planting flags and sticking hairs on the skin.

No matter how big the hair is, it will have limited significance in the real world, and the skin will have a sense of rejection, resistance, and plucking.

It is very difficult to pull out a Chinese restaurant, it is difficult to learn to use chopsticks after eating Chinese food and then forget how to use chopsticks, but it is very easy to pull out the Confucius Institute, it is also a foreign language, and it is very difficult to teach foreign languages in a new direction.

In North America and Western Europe, is there a person who has become an inspirational hero because of the spread of foreign cultures and different Chinese, and can go around giving speeches?

Think about it, it is difficult to ask for a way without speaking French in France, how can it be possible for it to regard a company and people who promote how to go abroad, promote foreign cultures and spread foreign Chinese as heroes? As soon as such a person speaks, it is instinct for France to turn around and leave the table, from the president to the ordinary people, where to speak? Let's have a "French Partner", the French will think this is called inspirational? Let's have "American Partner", which Hollywood film company will shoot?

A group of people who can't get along with the United States can go back to their former motherland to make money, and those who hold stinky feet can come out one after another with inspirational heroes, talk show celebrities, and speech masters. What about a change of variables? After replacing the United States with China and the motherland with Vietnam, the Chinese-Vietnamese who could not get along in China returned to Vietnam, and were praised by the Vietnamese people as inspirational heroes who taught Chinese, talk show celebrities who voted for China with their feet, and speech masters who preached China's superiority

What is the image of the Vietnamese people in the eyes of the Chinese?

I want others to respect you, but I don't respect myself. I think I think down on myself, but I ask others why they look down on me.

It's a kind of helplessness to bow your head to reality, but there are always people looking up at the stars!

Even those who sing praises are mostly watching the second TV, and their eyes and mouths are not the same channel, so what is there to complain about being infiltrated by Western values?

Even the rebuttals are Western-style, and the thinking is Western-style thinking, and when a sentence comes up on TV, people follow it. No matter what you say, the reaction is to conscientiously implement the spirit of the important speech, and like a robot, there is a reaction program.

If the water is gone, how can there be Chinese culture?

There is a good side to Chinese culture and a bad side, the good part is water, freehand, and blank, and the bad side is feudalism, dross, and imprisonment.

Freeze the water, and the dross will come out.

Is Yao Mingqiu really playing so well, if he doesn't vote for him to be an all-star, Chinese netizens are chaotic on the surface, and in their bones are the power of justice. If parents are used to it, it will be difficult to activate the power of the people.

The three volumes of "On War" are enough to fool the West for hundreds of years, and even the East has nothing to do to quote some fragmentary sentences, which feels quite meaningful, as the so-called emptiness is color and emptiness, which is quite fun.

The ruling class in the East treats appearances as entertainment, reciting poetry as a counterpoint, and entertaining and educating. The Western ruling class also treats appearances as entertainment, chicken soup for the soul, and teaches sheep lessons.

The appearance is very complicated, and how to remove the bubbles from the glass can be studied in countless ways, and the core is a matter of stirring two words.

This is what it means to pass on a sentence and a book of ten thousand books, and the method of exerting strength is to look at an inch more, just four words, which is similar to Li Guang's principle of taking stones as tigers and shooting stones without feathers. But art is not passed on lightly, and it is not necessarily a good thing to get a conclusion directly.

Because this kind of conclusion can pierce the layer of window paper for those with a solid foundation, let it break through the bottleneck and enter the house, but it is meaningless for those who have no foundation, but it is harmful.