"Catholics should boycott Diego Rose, and the Hollywood film industry must reflect on how many films they have made in the past that slander Catholicism......"

On the computer screen, a young man wearing a red baseball cap made a big statement, coupled with the news of Marquez Costello, the archbishop of the Catholic diocese of south-central California, who had seen it earlier, Michael Atert, chairman of the board of directors of the directors' union, frowned, Hollywood movies and Hollywood directors, when will it be the turn of these people to point fingers?

"Michael ......"

Bill Rossis, who was sitting next to him, suddenly spoke, "Hollywood is free to draw materials, which is the most basic right of directors. Pen Fun Pavilion www.biquge.info"

"I know." Michael Ated is clearly thinking about something.

Bill Rothes smiled and added, "This time the Catholic Church came out to interfere, and next time maybe another organization will jump out." ”

There are many organizations protesting against Hollywood films, such as the Children's Association, the National Federation of Teachers and Parents, and various environmental and animal protection organizations, but they are often not protesting against Hollywood films themselves.

Although Michael Atted is old, his eyes are still sharp, religious and socio-political issues have always been a hot topic in Hollywood, if the union is just watching the Catholic Church interfere, then next time, maybe cats and dogs will jump out, and directors don't have to make films, they all have to deal with these troubles.

This can't be filmed, that can't be filmed, so how can the directors work normally?

Seeing Michael Ated thinking, Bill Rothes didn't say much, and after Archbishop Márquez Costello's remarks entered the TV, they immediately aroused the attention of public opinion, whether it was in the media or on the Internet, and now you can see related topics everywhere.

The man who attacked Murphy jumped out and added another fire, making the film "Diego Rose" even more eye-catching.

It is no exaggeration to say that their series of actions and plans have basically achieved the desired purpose.

As for the reaction of Michael Atted to the reaction of several major Hollywood unions, which have also spoken in support of Hollywood's freedom of filmmaking, Bill Rossis can fully imagine that after all, this is Hollywood, where liberalism is rampant, not the northeastern United States, where the tradition of Catholic power is strong.

Michael Ated sat on the sofa chair and fell silent for a short time, the Catholic Church has attacked Hollywood not once or twice, when "The Da Vinci Code" was released, Ron Howard and Dan Brown attracted a lot of criticism from the Catholic Church, but those two were not thorns like Murphy Stanton, they chose to respond with silence, and the incident ended up.

But then, John Patrick Stanley was blacklisted by the Catholic Church because of a "Child Abuse Suspicion", and was scolded by the media leaning towards the Catholic Church.

As for the later films such as "Angels and Demons" and so on, every time there is a crooked factor of the Catholic Church, which is really annoying.

Accusation after accusation, Michael Ated has experienced.

His eyes became sharper and sharper, this is not the thirties and forties and fifties and sixties of the last century, the current Hollywood is full of free creative atmosphere, when will it be the turn of Catholicism to oppress?

Indeed, in the past, the Catholic Church conducted a moral review of Hollywood, but that brought not progress, but all kinds of fatal restrictions, on the other hand, in the past 40 years or so of breaking the moral restrictions of the Catholic Church, Hollywood films have developed rapidly and have dominated the world film market!

What do they want to do? Once again, an ethical review of Hollywood? Turning Hollywood movies backwards?

Michael Atehull stood up, and this situation has intensified in recent years, and it is impossible for the directors' union to allow other forces to interfere with the work of Hollywood directors.

He paced back and forth a few steps and said, "Bill, I'm going to make a recommendation to the board of directors to re-admit Murphy Stanton as a member of the Directors Guild, and you go back and have him submit an application, and the rest will wait for him to become a member of the Directors Guild." ”

"Okay!" Bill Rothes also stood up, "Murphy has long been looking forward to returning to the directors' guild. ”

It's clear that Michael Ated has expressed his support for Murphy.

"Then we'll keep in touch." Bill Rothes duly offered his farewell, "Goodbye, Michael. ”

Michael Ated nodded, "Goodbye." ”

Seeing off Bill Rossis, Michael Ated picked up his phone and made more than a dozen calls in one go, communicating with many permanent directors of the Directors Guild Council about the matter.

As for whether the plots of those movies involving the Catholic Church are based on facts, whether it is Michael Ated or other members of the Council, they don't ask at all, in their heads, what kind of subject matter and content Hollywood makes, that is Hollywood's freedom, outsiders' dissatisfaction can be solved through legal means, but indiscriminate interference is a violation of their right to freedom!

After receiving a call from Bill Rosith, Murphy immediately prepared the relevant materials and sent them to the directors' guild in person as soon as possible, if nothing else, he will become a member of the directors' guild again before and after the Oscar nominations are announced.

Spokespeople for the directors' union, the writers' union and the Producers' Union, as well as several other union organizations, were all on Murphy's side when asked by the media about the controversy over Catholicism and the film.

Looking at the entire Hollywood film industry, except for a very small number of Catholics who said that the director must be cautious and cautious when it comes to religion, the vast majority of people who were asked about this matter more or less expressed their support for "Diego Rose".

In a world where liberalism is increasingly rampant, it is almost inevitable that there will be a backlash when outside forces touch the freedoms that insiders flaunt and see as off-limits.

Even though Hollywood once had a deep connection with Catholicism, the situation is completely different in this day and age.

It was precisely because Murphy had a deep understanding of this that he dared to implement such a plan.

In 1929, five Catholics, led by the devout Catholic publisher Martin Quickley and the Jesuit Daniel Lauder, drafted a self-regulatory production ordinance for the film industry, which was intended to provide moral constraints on the production of films. In 1930, the draft was accepted by the giants of the film industry in its entirety and enforced by the "Hayes Office", a document that would later rule Hollywood for nearly three decades.

For Hollywood at the time, the Hays Code was a self-regulatory means of quelling the boycott of films by various religious groups and avoiding police or government interference in the studio.

The Code positions cinema as "entertainment for the masses", but this entertainment has a "special moral responsibility" because it has a characteristic unlike any other means of entertainment or communication - a universal charm that transcends racial or class boundaries and social or political barriers, so much so that everyone loves to watch it.

It is for this reason that filmmakers do not enjoy the same freedom of expression as stage playwrights, fiction writers or newspaper editors, and cinema has become the morality drama of the 20th century, telling the public how to live according to the rules.

In the summer of 1933, the Archbishop of Philadelphia claimed that the films shown in his diocese "crossed" Catholic moral norms and called on all Catholics to boycott them. In the same year, the Catholic forces in Chicago also joined the condemnation, and 500,000 female Catholics also launched a so-called "holy war" against Hollywood.

In 1934, the "Catholic Moral Alliance", a national church organization in the United States, was founded, and its main responsibility was to review the moral content of Hollywood films, issue a list of films that should be completely banned or re-censored to the Hayes office, and label "condemnation" of films that dared to "go along" with Catholic ethics.

To ensure that Catholics follow the Church's directives in the action of the coalition against the film, Bishop of Cincinnati, Mike Nicholas, even drafted an oath for the "moral union."

From then on, Catholics throughout the country were required to take an oath at Mass, led by a priest, acknowledging that cinema was "a grave danger to young people, to family life, to the state and to religion", and to assure God not to watch films that the Church had called "evil and unhealthy".

In addition to this oral oath, many Catholic churches require congregants to sign a formal pledge, and in just a few weeks, more than a million people in Chicago and Boston alone took the anti-film oath.

This period was arguably the most heavily interfered with by the Catholic Church in Hollywood, and lasted until the late forties and early fifties after the end of World War II.

But by the late forties, the Catholic Church's influence on Hollywood had been shaken repeatedly, and in the face of the devastation of World War II, the "warm world" created on screen based on Catholic morality was increasingly difficult for American audiences, let alone overseas audiences who had suffered from the war.

From the early fifties, the huge influence of Catholicism on Hollywood began to collapse, and the changes in American social thought, especially the devastating impact of World War II on traditional concepts, seriously weakened the social influence of the church, and also made the moral precepts of the production rules seem ridiculous in the eyes of the people of the time.

By the sixties and seventies, with the rise of anti-traditional movements such as the hippies, the influence of Catholicism on Hollywood had weakened to a dispensable situation, and by the new century, Hollywood could no longer tolerate the interference of Catholic forces in itself.

For example, Murphy personally experienced it a few years ago, "The Da Vinci Code" is based on Dan Brown's novel of the same name, which is full of content involving Catholicism, many of which subvert the theoretical basis of Catholic propaganda, you can imagine how much this film will be hindered by Catholicism, but the film not only did not abort, but also became one of the biggest selling films of the year.

It's not just Hollywood that has changed, but North American audiences, even some Catholic audiences, have also changed.