Ask for commuter passes and recommended tickets!

The audience in the screening hall has not yet ended, and the words of the former Hollywood producer named Steve Pound immediately attracted a lot of hostile eyes, he knew that this was not a place for him to abuse wantonly, put away his dissatisfaction, quickly left the theater, and drove back home as fast as possible. Pen @ fun @ pavilion wWw. ｂｉｑUｇE。 ｉｎｆｏ

As a member of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, Steve Pound, although he is in his seventies, unlike those who like to vote with his feet, has always cherished his Oscar votes very much, and goes to see the Oscar candidates every year.

If you want to make a difference in the awards season, the producer and distributor will definitely invite the Oscar judges to enter the theater to watch the film after the film is released, and the Oscar judges also enjoy free ticket treatment, if the weight is heavy enough, there will be studios that will send copies of the participating films or DVD discs to them early.

This can be said to be an entry condition for the awards, even if you vote with your feet, the judges will not even hear about the film, and it is impossible to get a chance to be nominated.

Steve Pound is old enough to be a core member of the academy in terms of going to the theater in person.

However, Steve Pound himself never sees it that way, and he actively participates in the Oscars every year, from nominations to final awards.

After receiving an invitation to watch the movie from Twentieth Century Fox, he deliberately entered the theater, but when he saw the film, not only was he not surprised, but he felt angry, a director who is well-known in the United States, praised by countless media and fans, and praised by the industry, actually made such a shameless film!

Yes, Steve Pound thinks this film is completely shameless, what is Murphy Stanton preaching?

He is indeed a typical noir-style film, and the value orientation in the film is not so correct, but it is not as outrageous as the film "The Wolf of Wall Street"!

Steve Pound turned on his computer, quickly updated his Twitter, and wrote a large article, which focused on two points: It's a shame to go through three hours of torture and make a film like this!

Although not a core member of the academy, Steve Pound's age and qualifications are here, and he also has a wide network of connections in Hollywood, and the film review has just been sent out and reposted by many people.

As the number of passers-by watching "The Wolf of Wall Street" grew, some negative reviews inevitably began to appear on the Internet.

"The Wolf of Wall Street is the worst movie I've ever seen!"

"In addition to the fact that the director and starring are big names, this film is a super bad movie, with no connotation, negative energy, **** shots, and completely social pollution, I really can't figure out how my Iron Man Tony Stark would pick this kind of script."

These voices quickly attracted the attention of the media, and since one of the purposes of "The Wolf of Wall Street" was for the awards season and the Oscars, Steve Pound was not the only Oscar judge invited by Twentieth Century Fox to go to theaters for free, and there were other Oscar judges who did not like the film.

Especially in Los Angeles, an Oscar screening on Saturday night was held in prime time, and many of the Oscar judges who knew each other watched the movie together in a theater in Beverly Hills, turning the screening into a middle-aged and elderly screening.

One of the female judges, Adele, who is close to 70 years old, was interviewed by media reporters at the end of the show, and she criticized watching "The Wolf of Wall Street" as "torture" and "disgusting scenes appeared again and again".

Adele also said that many Oscar judges, including her, did not like the film, but she also admitted that other Oscar judges gave applause when they screened it.

The video of the interview then appeared on the turtle, and then it was reposted by many viewers and Oscar judges who didn't like "The Wolf of Wall Street."

The rise of social networks has provided convenience for film production topics and publicity and hype, and is also conducive to the rapid spread of the film's good reputation.

In the same way, if there is any unfavorable voice for the film, it can often be transmitted as soon as possible.

Forty or fifty Oscar judges have posted or retweeted negative reviews of "The Wolf of Wall Street" through social networking sites, and their avatars show that these people are almost without exception gray-haired seniors.

Naturally, such comments were also seen by the pervasive media, and by Sunday morning, there were already paper media outlets commenting on the matter.

"The good news is that in one day on Saturday, 'The Wolf of Wall Street' earned $27.4 million."

In the Upper East Side restaurant, Gal Gadot put his handmade breakfast in front of Murphy, held his porcelain plate, sat across from him, looked at the newspaper in front of the porcelain plate, and said, "The bad news is that the negative reviews have been circulating through social networking sites, and our online trolls can't control it at all." ”

"It's okay." Murphy nodded, cut off a slice of fried egg, put it in his mouth, and said, "It tastes great." ”

"Thank you." Gal Gadot smiled sweetly.

"It's not like it used to be that the news on the Internet is circulating faster and it's really instantaneous, and it's impossible for us to influence all the social networking sites," Murphy said as he ate. ”

Gal Gadot shrugged her shoulders, shoved a slice of vegetable into her mouth, and swallowed it without knowing the taste, but after all these years, she had become accustomed to this diet.

Eating a small half of the vegetable salad, Gal Gadot looked at the newspaper in front of him, pushed it to Murphy's side, and said, "Take a look." ”

Putting down his knife and fork, Murphy grabbed the newspaper and took a quick look at it.

"Murphy Stanton's new work "The Wolf of Wall Street" has been released, and a special viewing voyage has been arranged in Los Angeles, where the Oscar judges gathered, in order to build momentum for next year's awards......

After reading this, Murphy couldn't help but shake his head, it was just dozens of Oscar judges, and the number of judges who praised the film was more than ten times that of these people.

After breakfast, he saw more negative comments on the Internet, and for conservatives, "The Wolf of Wall Street" was definitely a poison that was hard to swallow.

The conservative media, critics, and Oscar judges believe that "The Wolf of Wall Street" is an extravagant "crazy show" that "opens with a crowd of demons dancing wildly and constantly rushes to the crazier limits", and "the whole film is a disgusting scene that repeats itself".

Later, when Murphy went to participate in a promotional event, he was interviewed by reporters about the matter.

"The film itself just shows the experience and behavior of the character as plainly as possible, and objectively describes the process of all this happening without any sympathy or criticism as much as possible."

In the face of a large number of reporters, he does not think that there is a problem with this film, "The characters in the film are originally like that: they are all evil and extravagant, and they never feel that they have done anything wrong, and they are unwilling to apologize for their actions. ”

"The Wolf of Wall Street" was treated like this, and Murphy is not surprised, and now the Oscar judges are more aging and conservative, according to the analysis of the Los Angeles Times, the average age of the 6,028 Oscar judges this year has risen from 62 to 63 years old, and the aging trend has intensified.

Frankly speaking, his new film is nearly 3 hours long, and there is no shortage of *** foul language and drug scenes, which seems too discordant for some old-school Oscar judges and is not recognized by them.

But this does not mean that the Olympic journey of "The Wolf of Wall Street" has been dashed in advance, on the one hand, the Oscars are constantly replenishing new blood, and there are also many people who enjoy such films.

On the other hand, this is not the first time that Murphy's film has been publicly condemned at the screening of the Oscars, and previous films have also been criticized for being too violent and shady, but this time it was a little louder.

When asked by a reporter about the scale of the film, Murphy said calmly, "This film is not for 14-year-olds, and it will not meet everyone's taste." ”

As more and more reporters gathered around, bodyguards came to remind Murphy that he was about to leave, and just as he was about to get into the car, a reporter with a Los Angeles Times sign on his chest got in front of him.

"Hello, Director Stanton, I'm Amanda Ferrara, the journalist who interviewed you at the premiere."

The female reporter stuffed the microphone in front of Murphy for the first time, and Murphy nodded expressionlessly, the premiere was so messy, and it was all this, how could he remember who she was.

As if afraid that Murphy would run away, the female reporter hurriedly asked in a loud voice, "What do you think of the shame that some Oscar judges and members of the film school criticized your film?" ”

"I think these judges only believe that cinema should be an idealized version of life," Murphy said, shrugging his shoulders and then spreading his hands, "rather than exploring the dark side of human nature, that's why we don't have deep works." ”

After saying this, he no longer gave the reporter a chance to ask questions, and turned his head and got into the car.

It is true that there are Oscar judges who are slamming him, but there are also a large number of people who support him and this "The Wolf of Wall Street". (To be continued.) )