Brian Barlow of the San Francisco Chronicle wrote, "Lancelot seems to be eager to declare that his talent is exhausted!" Choosing a 'Mad Max 4', obviously, this is not an Oscar work, and likewise, it is not a work that can make a difference at the box office. Pen, fun, pavilion www. biquge。 info Now it seems that Lancelot is desperate to prove that his indulgence is something that no one can resist, no one; But the harsh reality will tell him that this is life, not a movie. ”

The New York Post's Megan Lehmann did not hide his concerns, "As a director with a unique style, Lancelot has always been able to surprise us. But is he too eager this time? George Miller once injected amazing energy into 'Mad Max 4', but it was a cult classic, and even if Lancelot was able to revive the franchise, it would be almost impossible to gain recognition in the North American market. There is only a thin line between self-confidence and arrogance. ”

Jonathan Gerald, a veteran reporter for "Vanity Fair", is even more sharp-tongued, "Bury the future!" Lancelot's choice of work is always unexpected, and no one seems to have ever been able to predict his movements, but even for Lancelot, choosing 'Mad Max 4' is more of a suicidal act than a breakthrough. With such a stunner of Sin City, it seems that the whole of Hollywood has opened its doors and a road to success has been paved in front of Lancelot, but he has chosen to bury his future with his own hands. ”

It can be seen that Jonathan's report once again appeared in the six major film companies, and all reporters are hinting that if Lance chooses to compromise with Warner Bros. and Sony Pictures, success is within reach; But now Lance not only did not accept the proposal, but also chose "Mad Max 4" unusually, and all the actions seemed to people to be completely crazy.

It's not just the West Coast media like the San Francisco Chronicle and Vanity Fair, but even the East Coast media can't understand Lance's choice, and it seems that everyone has a huge question mark in their heads: Why? Why "Mad Max 4"? From any point of view, this is not a work that can win the box office, nor is it a work worth squandering 200 million, let alone a work that can turn things around! Even if Lance wants to break the blockade of the big six studios, "Mad Max 4" is not the right choice, more like ...... Panic in despair.

So, was Lance really cornered by Warner Bros. and Sony Pictures?

When "Mad Max 4" gradually revealed its true colors, 81 media outlets in the United States reported on it, and 49 of them were not optimistic about Lance's choice; Twenty-three other media outlets expressed a wait-and-see attitude, with no support or opposition; Only nine media outlets expressed a positive attitude - all from the East Coast.

Just this data can be seen, it seems that all the media have agreed on the fact that Lance has lost his mind, and the big film companies led by Warner Bros. have really driven Lance to a dead end, and Lance, who is unwilling to compromise, has made such a crazy choice regardless of it.

Javier of the New York Times expressed deep curiosity in his comment, "I still remember that when Lancelot appeared in Rio de Janeiro and was so focused on filming 'City of God,' my first reaction was: Why? Why did the director abandon many projects in North America and choose to go to Brazil for this ghetto filming? Why did the director choose such a marginal world for filming? Why did the director shoot with an all-amateur cast? Question marks, full of question marks, it seems that apart from doubts, or doubts, there is no explanation for his actions at all.

This time it seems like I'm back in that situation. Why? Why did this director choose such a work at the peak of his career? Why did the director fall in love with a work about a post-apocalyptic wasteland? Why would the director be willing to squander $200 million to create a work that seems out of place in the mainstream market? Why! One question mark after another, and no explanation can be found.

But I thought, maybe that's the difference between me and Lancelot. He has made such unique and wonderful works as 'City of God', 'Murder by the Sword' and 'City of Sin', and I am just an ordinary film journalist, who uses light, color, and composition to construct bizarre worlds, but alludes to the real society, triggering countless far-reaching thoughts, and I am just an ordinary film lover.

I will never be able to understand Lancelot's thoughts, so I can only passively accept them, follow his footsteps, his lens to figure out that magical world. It was so before, and it is still so. So, I'm even more curious, why 'Mad Max 4', and what kind of world will this director build to shake my world?

I'm already looking forward to it. ”

Javier's caution can be seen from the comments, he did not directly express his support for "Mad Max 4", because they could not understand Lance's choice, but he expressed his support for Lance and focused all on Lance. Javier tried to remind people that this has been the case in the last four productions, and no one was optimistic about Lance's choice, but in the end Lance proved his ability. Now, too.

As Havel says, shouldn't people be more curious than critical? Curious how exactly "Mad Max 4" attracted Lance? Curious about what kind of world Lance will present?

On the other hand, Nancy Black of the Chicago Tribune also expressed her opinion, "I remember after Sin City came out, I had a dispute with a couple of fellow film critics: Is Lancelot's film more commercial or artistic?

We argued for a long time, and even blushed, but we couldn't come to an accurate conclusion. Because Lancelot's works always have a hint of cult attributes, the weird and sharp colors always seem different, and we agree on this; But Lancelot's works have always been able to keenly capture the hearts of moviegoers, and three consecutive works have exceeded 200 million at the North American box office, which is a remarkable achievement, and it also makes Lancelot's style more difficult to guess.

Now, I am back to the original point of the question, is 'Mad Max 4' more commercial or artistic? Needless to say, this is a reboot of a cult movie, and closing your eyes can still depict the shock of that wasteland world built by George Miller; But at the same time, this is a work with a budget of up to 200 million, and if the global box office does not cross the threshold of 800 million, it will mean a failed commercial work. So, what exactly is Lancelot doing?

Perhaps, this is the charm of Lancelot, which no one can guess except himself. So, if anyone thinks about my problem, please write to us and let us know, I don't appreciate it. ”

Compared with Javier, Nancy's support is even more obvious, revealing a kind of "don't talk nonsense if you don't understand" between the lines, and condemning those media to fan the flames and mislead readers. Although Nancy doesn't understand "Mad Max 4" very well, Nancy firmly believes that this movie has put so much effort into Lance, and it will definitely not be "a work built for failure".

However, the "New York Times" and the "Chicago Tribune" have not many allies, only nine media outlets, and the "Vanity Fair" comments have undoubtedly received the most recognition, and Jonathan's sharp and direct comments express the direction of the entire public opinion now, and almost everyone believes that Lance is killing himself. This also makes "burial of the future" a bright keyword in the autumn file.

On the one hand, people think that "Mad Max 4" is the choice to ignite **; On the other hand, people are looking forward to the performance of "Fruit Hard Candy" - if this work continues Lance's previous strong performance and wins recognition again, it will inevitably make people more suffocating about "Mad Max 4"; But if this work has already glimpsed the signs of Lance's decline, then perhaps there is a sign of a desperate decision to choose "Mad Max 4", and it seems that this is the answer that people are looking for.

Inadvertently, "Lancelot" has become the most discussed word, and two works closely related to Lance have attracted countless attention. "Fruit Hard Candy", which was originally just screened as an experimental movie, quietly became a hit. It's just that, given the current impassioned mood among people, no one knows if this is good news or bad news for the "fruit hard candies".

But there is no doubt that Hollywood's major studios have quietly changed their attitudes, as if they were watching a vigorous bombing scene, watching the staff arrange the beautifully packaged explosives according to the plan, as if they were carefully planned as artistic creations, and then press the detonation button to witness the entire building shattered.

Just when everyone's eyes were focused on Reims, the screening ceremony of "Good Night, Good Luck" was held ceremoniously and officially, as George Clooney's second work as a director, it had already made a big splash at the Venice Film Festival, including the Best Screenplay Award, Best Actor Award and many other trophies. (To be continued.) )