In the forty-seventh year of the post-war period, the famous and notorious Japanese populist and governor of Tokyo, Ishihara Shozo, has always been haunted by why the United States did not carry out strategic bombing of Germany's major cities in Japan. He was even more angry at the United States' act of expelling and mutilating Japanese nationals, but the Japanese Government did not dare to say a word about China, which had also strategically bombed Japan. What is the pen ~ fun ~ pavilion www.biquge.info? The lessons of World War II are not far away, and Japan's disposition to bully the soft and fear the hard is also difficult to shake. Twenty years after World War II, Japan's attitude toward China can be described in one word: deference. Japan's political leaders have repeatedly made inappropriate remarks against the United States and Canada, and have made remarks about pursuing the United States for provoking the war (from China's point of view); But not a single one of them openly attacked China for its strategic bombing of Japan.

Those who know Japan, China too. Since the founding of the People's Republic of China, China has recovered the Ryukyus and occupied Tanegashima and other Japanese islands, and has been "riding" on Japan ever since. As a member of the Axis powers, Italy has long since become a permanent member of the Security Council and has made its voice heard internationally, while Japan has not yet regained its status as a normal state (as a subject state of China). In front of China, the angle of today's Japan nodding and bowing is almost the same as that of its predecessors bowing on the Chunfan Tower -- the image of the victor and the vanquished, sixty years later, is still as clear as yesterday. The Chinese know very well why the Japanese are so obedient to the Chinese language. Therefore, no matter how solemnly the Chinese express their support for Japan as a non-permanent member, agree to its military and political loosening - and so on -- they will not allow Japan to really stand up from under its crotch.

Zhuo Nansheng, a well-known expert on Japanese issues of Singaporean origin, said that China has a red line for Japan's future evolution: First, Japan is not allowed to sit on a political equal with itself in the normal world, and second, Japan is not allowed to possess weapons of mass destruction and anti-missile defense means, otherwise Japan will no longer take China seriously. The Chinese smile shows the "bodhisattva heart", but the "thunderbolt" hand is also in the pocket, ready to knock the Japanese at any time.

The basic meaning of strategy is the guidance of war, and now it is sometimes extended to the basic national policy. Whether it is the bodhisattva's heart or the means of thunderbolts, it is impossible to say who is superior and who is inferior, everything is transferred by time, place, and object. The history of the Han Dynasty and relatives in China is endless, but the Han Dynasty also left behind the ambition and domineering spirit of "those who commit strong Han will be punished even if they are far away". In the complicated international exchanges, it is not necessarily good to blindly "thunderbolt methods", but in a world where the law of the jungle is still prevalent, just having a "bodhisattva heart" will certainly not work. From this point of view, there is much to be reviewed about China's strategy toward Japan before World War II, and the thunderbolt tactics of the Soviet Union (Russia), as well as China's strategy toward Japan in the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression in history, especially China's meticulous and meticulous approach to Japan's study of Japan at that time, have been used for reference. Chinese love to talk about strategy, but without courage as a backing, any strategy is just a vain strategy.

Dignity can only be defended by strength, which refers not only to strength itself, but also to the determination and courage to show strength. Different from the weakness of old China to Japan such as Jiang Datou in the previous historical plane, the Chinese Democratic Empire, under Wu Chenxuan's consistent advocacy, did not hesitate to use tough means against unfriendly countries around it, and established the image of a dignified black-faced bigwig, which is also one of the reasons why when China established the Chinese Community, the original Qing Dynasty vassal states returned one after another, and even the originally unrelated Kashmir, Rajat, Bangladesh and other states have joined the same country, after all, this boss seems to be really reliable.

The British strategist Fuller said: "Unless history teaches us how to look into the future, military history is only a bloody romance of mankind." "At a time when some American right-wingers are arrogant and some white supremacists in South America are also waving their flags and shouting, it is not meaningless to look back on the historical events of World War II and the negative and positive benefits brought to the Chinese nation by the strategic decisions of the old China and the new Chinese democratic empire.

According to the impression of many colonialists in the past, it can be concluded that the Chinese democratic empire is a complete fool, willing to seek the near and far, leaving the fat of the Indian peninsula behind, and looking for those painstaking things to do. Some people may think that most of the Indian princely states were originally China's little brothers and puppets, and they have always obeyed China's words, and if from this point of view, the people of Indian states should be bullied by the Chinese. Then you can ask a random Indian, which Chinese have enslaved you, and what point of trade and diplomacy between China and India has suffered a big loss? Have the Chinese, including the subject countries, ever enslaved any of the people of the subject countries (not counting the tens of millions of Filipino servants who work in China every year)? It is inevitable that there will be conflicts between countries for commercial interests, and that is a matter between businessmen, just like the issue of Japan's imports of Chinese beef and agricultural products, it is estimated that there will also be between the United States and Canada, and in the end people can solve it through negotiation and consultation. I have never heard of the United States threatening others with bombers because of trade problems, nor have I heard of a country losing commercial negotiations because it does not have a strategic air force. China is the only country in the world with nuclear weapons, but in business, it sometimes falls into the traps set by European and American businessmen, and has never heard of China using the atomic bomb to scare people and turn the situation back. Moreover, even if the threat of the atomic bomb is successful, the loss of trade is money, and the production of the atomic bomb itself costs money, and perhaps the cost of developing weapons is higher. China's means of maintaining its sole superpower in the world is not to rely on force, but more through economic means.

"So, in fact, there are a lot of concepts in the Indian states that are misled by the government. The really bad Indians are the ones who really support the dictatorship. Because it is enough for them to deal with (or play tricks) with the dictatorship, so that they only need to deal with one end, and it is not more convenient for the dictatorship to enslave its own people. Take our industrial policy and foreign exchange policy as a particularly obvious example, the Indians have served as cheap labor for China over the years, and the Chinese have not entered India to enslave the Indian people, but the Indians themselves have enslaved our own people. Every foreign trade company has one-on-one trade negotiations with the Chinese, and has not let the Chinese take advantage, this is not that we have any strategic bombers in our hands, but that the Chinese cannot force anyone to do business in free trade. But at the macro level of the country, we have suffered losses on the national account, and we ostensibly see that the Chinese are bullying India's export enterprises, but in fact the stupid government is helping the Chinese to squeeze Indian workers. Who doesn't want to make more money in business, and who makes our government unable to protect us well? If we can protect ourselves, what do you want your government to do? What can really protect us is the wisdom of the government, and if you don't have wisdom, you don't dare to use force, which is equivalent to spending so much money in vain to develop the country's armed forces. Look at the other countries around us, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Burma have seized India's islands, and the northern states of the Chinese community have occupied our borders. He also said that India's armed forces can scare China thousands of kilometers away, and even neighboring countries hundreds of kilometers away cannot, if they can scare others, then why not do it? I don't know what else the major Indian states can boast of in order to have some bombers that China has obsolete and obsolete.

Therefore, I believe that modern warfare has nothing to do with ideas, not with plundering resources. For example, the secular regime of the Chinese in Iraq (the anti-Chinese government secretly supported by Germany) did not pull the crude oil there to India for free, if so, India's oil prices would at least fall, but unfortunately they have risen a lot over the years. Even if China is fighting for resources, what does India have to grab? What resources are left besides the large number of people? Do people still want to rob it? Look at the long queue at the Chinese embassy, the visa fee of a few hundred yuan will be abolished in two or three minutes, and then pay a few hundred yuan to make persistent efforts. If I refuse any country, I promise that I will never go again in my life.

If you want to be strong, you will not kill others, you will automatically become stronger, and what India needs for its development is cooperation to make everyone strong together. The so-called self-denial of the Chinese is aimed at the government, not at the people. What the Chinese promote to the world is the idea of free exchange, although it is normal for the Chinese to think about themselves everywhere and for their own interests, we should do the same ourselves, which requires wisdom, not Chinese charity. If the Chinese promote democracy and promote their own values in order to weaken India's strength, it is really impossible to find a theoretical basis. It is true if we say that an authoritarian national system can unite our country, but there is an assumption that people have overlooked. That is, the behavior of the whole country must be right, and if it is wrong, then the situation will be worse. How can we justify the authoritarian system of the Republic of Hyderabad? In fact, strengthening oneself is more important than harming others, and improving one's own wisdom is a weapon to prevent others from bullying oneself. It is fundamental to let wise and thoughtful people enter China's decision-making level, and the only way to achieve this is to practice democracy. ”

This is an editorial in India's "Radiant Daily", which also reflects China's role in the post-war international community, although it is not very magnificent, but it undoubtedly establishes a new order that all countries dare not challenge, and of course, it is also an order that is more in line with China's fundamental interests.