During the period of the release of Three-Body Problem 2, the biggest topic of discussion among people is naturally this movie.

Saying that this is a good movie is naturally a matter of course, but what people are discussing now is whether this movie will win in this year's awards season.

It may seem early to say this, but if such a question is Levy's film, people don't find it strange at all. After all, it seems to be a common practice that Levy's films are always well received, and his films are always favored by the Oscars, which is also well known. Will the three-body 2 this time also be favored? It's also a problem for people.

The release of this movie was released in the summer, and the movies released during this time period generally have nothing to do with the Oscars. However, since this movie is Levy's, it obviously can't be analyzed with common sense. Especially the rest of the film is already very good, so if you look at the means of filming, will he be able to challenge for the Oscars?

The media quickly came up with an answer to this question. After all, most people can see that many parts of this movie do have the level of winning awards.

Putting aside the ideological nature of the results that have not yet been discussed by the media, technological innovation is enough to impress people with this movie. The concept of 3D movies has made many filmmakers feel the changes of the times, and from this alone, this movie is enough for it to become an Oscar hit.

Moreover, in addition to ideological and technological innovation, there are many other things worth learning from this film.

For example, the film's clever use of filming techniques - in 3D movies, the Lilliputian effect, and the problem of not being able to see clearly when the picture is too dark. It has always been seen as a technical deficiency in 3D films. But in this movie, these problems are put to good use. The combination of Lilliputian effect and God's perspective, the overly dark picture, with the low music, and the firelight of Shandong, create a gloomy atmosphere, and the use of these shooting techniques is all praised.

In addition to the picture, the sound of this movie can also be said to be extremely classic. Those hustle and bustle. In the 3D shooting, it is obvious that attention is paid to the different problems of distance and nearness, compared to 2D, it is more layered, although the use of the soundtrack cannot be said to be incomparable, but it is also shocking - especially the part of the space war, the silence of the universe, and the scene of the destruction of the Earth fleet are combined, on the one hand, it is very realistic to reproduce the silence of the universe, and on the other hand, it also highlights the desperate struggle of human beings, such a picture. In other movies, it has never been.

The quality of a movie can be seen from the picture and sound of the movie. 3D cinema is a field that no one has ever touched on, and it's in this field. People don't have enough experience yet. However, people have no experience in shooting, but at least they have the ability to understand other people's shooting techniques, and they have the ability to shoot Levy's shooting methods. There are definitely not a few people who can understand. And these people are basically all full of praise for his movies.

The rhythm of the film, the plot. Connotation, actors, these aspects are not discussed, that is, just talking about the filming techniques and sound configuration of the movie, it is enough to see Levy's intentions for this movie, as well as his deep ambitions.

Is this movie going for the Oscars? There is no need to think much about this question.

"Anything else is just the beginning of a movie, it can already beat all other movies. From the perspective of ants to the perspective of humans, this is a change from a two-dimensional world to a three-dimensional world. In the past, our films were movies that could only be enjoyed on a flat surface, just like ants, we were creatures living in a three-dimensional world, but we could only perceive two-dimensional pictures. From the perspective of ants to the perspective of humans, this change can be said to be the most perfect metaphor for 2D movies to 3D movies. ”

Some careful media still found the unusual place of film shooting through some things in the movie. At first glance, I didn't think there was anything like this, but seeing the hot market for 3D movies now, and then seeing this lens that symbolizes the transition from 2D to 3D, the media can also perceive how ambitious Levy was when shooting this shot.

This shot can already be said to be a concrete embodiment of Levy's ambition.

It is precisely because of these shots that when the movie was released, people were also thinking about whether it was possible for the movie to compete for the Oscars.

It stands to reason that it is not very rare for commercial blockbusters to win Oscars in the past two years. Whether it's Titanic or The Lord of the Rings, they all won the Oscar in this way. Compared with those two movies, the influence of Three-Body Problem 2 is not bad at all, whether it is the technical level or the ideology of the movie, compared to those movies, it is better than that, if you just say so, it seems that it is not impossible to win awards.

However, the only thing that makes people feel suspicious is that it is a movie that was released in the summer. After all, most of the movies that want to compete for the Oscar will still choose to be released around Christmas - even Big Ship and The Lord of the Rings 3 have chosen this time period and have not chosen to be released in the summer.

So, will the Three-Body Problem 2, which was chosen to be released in the summer, be impacted by the movies released in the winter? This has also become a big question for people. After all, it's a commercial film. It is an indisputable fact that a commercial film will always be impacted by some literary films.

However, for many people, such a question can be said to have just arisen and immediately dispelled - will it really be impacted? Judging from the level of Oscar awards in the past two years, is it really possible for those movies to impact the Three-Body Problem 2?

Yes, the Oscar-winning films of these two years can be called good movies to some extent. When these directors are not shooting movies, they have a good grasp of the rhythm, the picture, and the story. However, these aspects. The shooting of Three-Body Problem 2 is not bad at all, and in terms of box office and influence, it is not a problem for Three-Body Problem 2 to completely throw off such a movie at several levels. The amount of investment in Three-Body Problem 2, Levy didn't use all of it on picture production, the level of his movie shooting is quite high, is there really a good enough movie to challenge him?

In terms of filming techniques, they are unlikely to outperform the three-body 2; Speaking of actors' performances, they are also unlikely to win; Even when it comes to the ideology of literary films, which are the most advantageous. Compared with Three-Body Problem 2, those movies don't seem to be the same to win.

If you look at it this way, it seems that no matter what you say, Levy has won.

However, after all, Levy has already won two Oscars, can he really win a third? If he really gets it, then his honor will definitely be the first in Hollywood, can such a thing really happen?

The media has a lot of doubts about this.

And at this time. Levy is very confident in these questions.

His movies are much better than the 3D movies he remembers, which is already a big surprise to him.

In Levy's memory, the Avatar movie was released after its release. The reviews received can be said to be very polarizing. People who like it say that it is the first in film history, creating a 3D frenzy. With the best special effects, this can already be said to be the most perfect movie. As for the plot or something - with such special effects, the plot can be made without major mistakes.

But. People who don't like it are extremely bad for his plot, and they have always commented badly. Not to mention compared with Cameron's own classic Titanic, it is another science fiction work, slightly later than his ninth district, his plot is also much worse. Although it is said that at the box office, it is almost the king without any controversy, but when it comes to the connotation and level of the movie, it is quite disdainful.

In fact, this was also reflected in the later Oscars: the same big-budget movies, Titanic and The Lord of the Rings 3 both won as many as 10 awards, but Avatar only won 3 awards, and Cameron himself lost to his ex-wife.

Although it has a huge advantage in technological innovation, Avatar's shooting, except for technological innovation, has no strengths. Although the bomb disposal unit of that year was not a good movie, at least, the movie that was great enough was a plus.

Compared with the evaluation of leading the 3D trend, Avatar does not have much innovation in the filming technology and plot of the movie.

Compared with it, the three-body 2 can be said to be a lot more than that.

When Levi was filming, if he absorbed the concept of Avatar in the concept of shooting, then in terms of shooting technology, he absorbed more of the strengths and shooting techniques of movies such as youth school and gravity. In terms of ideological expression, he did not completely follow the Three-Body Problem 2, but was more excavating the content of human nature, and with these efforts, his films have the momentum they have today.

These things, the original Avatar did not have, and could not have: Cameron is also a mortal after all, it is impossible for him to know the advantages and disadvantages of 3D movies before he shoots 3D movies, and he has already summarized how to shoot 3D movies. These things should have advanced over time, first with Avatar, then with the 3D movie craze, and then with innovation in gravity shooting.

But now, Levy has done it all in one step.

Now, what he wants to do is to take what people's experience in 3D film production in the next four or five years is condensed to compete with Hollywood films.

Technological innovation, pioneering in shooting, and profundity in thought, none of these things are lacking in his films, how can other movies compare with himself?

Even, even if these are not compared, but to fight public relations and relationships, I am not afraid. If you want to talk about relationships, your relationship in Hollywood is not bad at all. And when it comes to public relations - the cost of public relations for this movie, can other films really be compared? (To be continued......)