Regarding the recent issue of setting "control rules", I think it should be explained in a chapter. First of all, let's explain the problem of this multi-person feedback, that is: Is the revision of the rules too exaggerated? Secondly, I want to explain that in my estimation, Tudou probably won't describe the dominance level as such a bug, why? Because here are two answers to the question of 'breaking the rules and winning control'. 1. How much does the phrase 'break the rules and dominate' philosophically mean? 2: How much does Tudou's 'break the rules and win control' mean in the book "The Great Juggernaut"? Based on these two questions, the answers are completely different, and the one I chose is the first and the most extreme one, because I have a problem with people, that is, I like to push the effect of each sentence to the extreme. I'm going to start. First of all, let's use the method of philosophical logic to explain the original text of Tudou mentions "breaking the rules and winning control." "What the hell is it? So what are the rules? Rules are a trend, also known as inevitable order, natural rules can not be changed in theory, for example, your father gave birth to you, in terms of rules and order, your father must have been born earlier than you, but in terms of status, you can't say that your father is older than you, because this is the rule of our human society, not the rules of nature, so if you can change the rules, you can make yourself born earlier than your father, but this has been destroyed in cause and effect, because your identity is "born by your father", and now you were born earlier than your father, This is logically wrong, but when the rules are changed, it can be established. So in terms of derivation, to what extent can the rules be extended to the novel? I often see a lot of novels at every turn, the protagonist vows to go against the sky, breaking the rules of heaven Although I haven't really read a few novels, but as far as I know, these protagonists finally stood at the top of the world, and then no one was his opponent, so the story ended, but there is something wrong here, because the protagonist still did not break the rules of the sky, did not do 'against the sky', but in the original text, the author often said that the protagonist has gone against the sky. So now we have to ask, is this protagonist really against the sky? My answer is: no. Why? Because in terms of the rules and order of heaven and earth, the protagonist is often born later than heaven and earth, of course, it is the same when he was born earlier than heaven and earth, that is to say, in terms of order rules, there is a heaven first and then there is a protagonist, or there is a protagonist first and then there is a day, and the protagonist often goes to fight with the 'sky', and the sky here is interpreted as a kind of catastrophe in many novels, and it will be against the sky if it is overcome, but in fact, logically 'heaven' is the order of 'first heaven and earth and then the protagonist'. If my guess is correct, there shouldn't be many protagonists who can rebel against the heavens from this order, and if they are born later than heaven and earth, let themselves be born earlier than heaven and earth; If you are born before heaven and earth, then let yourself be born later than heaven and earth, this cannot be done, because if you do cause and effect, it will be contradictory. But because they didn't do it, the 'anti-sky' of these protagonists can only be regarded as 'pseudo-anti-sky', not the real anti-sky, I'm afraid that even the every move of these protagonists is run according to the order, with a small story as an example: story: the protagonist has a grudge against someone, and then vows to kill him, and finally went through hardships and finally succeeded. Here you can find that there is an order for the whole event, the beginning is that the protagonist has a grudge against someone, the second part is because of something and vows to kill him, the third step is to go through hardships, the fourth step can be successful, each step has a sequential order, so after changing the rules and order, what can the event become? Here's how: Step 1: The protagonist goes through the ordeal. Step 2: The protagonist has a grudge against someone. Step 3: The protagonist succeeds. Step 4: The protagonist vows to kill someone. Tell me: Do you think everything is messed up? Yes, that's what I mean by breaking through rules and order; And what I analyzed according to Tudou's "breaking the rules and winning control" is such a contradictory logic. Of course, if you want to dig deeper, you can develop indefinitely. Finally, let's go back to the previous sentence, I don't think Tudou will write like this, not to mention whether he has a way to understand this contradictory logic, even if he does, I don't think he will write like this, because this is nothing to do, and if he wants to make money, he has to vulgarize the whole novel, and try not to talk about these deep concepts. Conclusion: Don't apply the concept of Tongtian Yanwu to the Great Juggernaut.

;