The most nominated movies in the list, in addition to "Pirates 2", is "Youth Musical", which has also won numerous awards in major selection categories and popularity awards since the awards. Zack. Efron and Vanessa. Huggins was shortlisted for the Best Actor and Actress awards, which can be said to have opened a very bright and brilliant star road.

Although "Pirates 2" is a Disney movie, Daniel has investment and starring, not to mention "Youth Musical", which is basically the most talked about movie of the year. The two works have such achievements, which are logically in the past, but some people are unwilling to be reasonable.

"The nominations for the first 'Social Age Public Choice Awards' were announced a few days ago, and in the film and annual categories, "Pirates of the Caribbean 2" and "Youth Musical" shined, and basically won all the award nominations. But many have questioned whether the close relationship between the People's Choice Award and Daniel has affected the fairness of the nominations.

The four social networks that hold the Public Choice Awards are currently invested by Daniel's Plutos Investment Company, which can be said to basically cover the vast majority of social network users, and exceed most of the similar awards in terms of coverage. However, the People's Choice Award is different in that it does not open a channel for one-one-vote selection, but through a data processing system that collects data from the whole year on social networks to produce a list.

According to a spokesperson for the award organizing committee, considering that during the awards season, the exposure of literary and artistic films will increase significantly, so the organizing committee proposed a list of nominees, and waited until January 27, a month and a half later, to release the final list of winners in the list of nominees, so as to ensure that the awards cover more options.

But such a mechanism has raised concerns among many that the organizing committee that owns the data-processing system, despite its claims to have oversight from accounting firms and competent government departments, cannot avoid being perceived as a possibility of manual operation.

on the list of nominees for this session. The success of Daniel-related films has exacerbated this concern. Daniel's withdrawal from the selection does not seem to have done much to alleviate the situation, because if Daniel had been nominated, there would have been fewer skepticism - because he did have more influence and attention than anyone else. ”

"Variety" magazine has made a full analysis of this new award, and the magazine, which has always been known for its neutrality and authority, is quite reasonable, and does not deliberately ignore a fact in the end.

"Of course, we need to note that this year. "Pirates 2" and "Youth Musical" are indeed the two most watched works, and blockbusters such as "X-MAN", "Superman Returns" and "Cars" are all out of reach. So if it weren't for the awards, which were not dominated by Daniel, people might not have had too many different opinions about the results.

Therefore, if we evaluate this list of nominations from a more fair perspective, it should be said that it is an objective list, on the one hand, it has the characteristics of the selection awards, representing the tastes and tendencies of Internet users, and on the other hand, it seems to remove the blindness and shallowness of some selection awards. Mirren's finalist. It was surprising and pleasantly surprised.

Overall, the People's Choice Award, and its ingenious mechanics, may need more time to prove themselves. ”

Compared with the medium-held view of "Variety", Fox Cable Network is quite unkind and unreasonable.

"Daniel. Sandler single-handedly promoted the establishment of the 'Social Age People's Choice Award'. At the beginning of its establishment, it attracted many doubts. One of them: The existing popularity awards have Internet selection channels, whether it is necessary for social networks to personally participate in the creation of a new choice award; The second point is. As the person who led the awards, Daniel was also a participant and investor in many films, which led to widespread doubts among the public about the impartiality of the awards; The third point. The effectiveness of the data management system claimed by the organizing committee has not been credible enough.

Yesterday, the organizing committee announced the list of nominees for the first Public Choice Award, in the list, a series of works related to Daniel, "Pirates of the Caribbean 2", "Youth Musical", "Unstoppable" and so on were shortlisted. This has heightened skepticism about the public nature of the awards.

Perhaps, Daniel. Sandler and the organizing committee of the awards should think carefully about how to alleviate all kinds of doubts about him, otherwise the 'Social Age Public Choice Award' is likely to become a joke. ”

……

As an award for the public, it is impossible for the organizing committee to remain as cold as Daniel is to social concerns and public opinion.

Soon, the organizing committee issued a statement, saying that all nominations follow the facts, and I believe that all social network users have feelings, and the factors of the nominated actors in terms of exposure, influence, positive evaluation, social activity, etc., are the basis for the formation of the nomination list, and these bases are all personally participated by website users, so the organizing committee believes that the list can represent social network users, that is, the public choice in the social era. Moreover, the organizing committee also noticed that ordinary users have no obvious doubts and objections to the nomination list, and support and recognition occupy the mainstream opinion. Finally, they did not forget to thank everyone for their support and promised that they would continue to improve.

I have to say that it is a truth that reason travels all over the world.

The organizing committee quickly grasped the key to solving the problem.

That is, the list does represent the mainstream opinion, and while many of them have a lot to do with Daniel, there is no denying that they are representative - and the weight of each factor in the inaugural People's Choice Awards is still dominated by the basic materials such as exposure, mentions, and activity. It is possible that with the increase of the credibility and influence of the awards, the weight of professional evaluations, movie ratings, box office figures and other factors will gradually be increased to increase the professionalism of the awards, which is also a long-term plan of the organizing committee.

The public may like to vote, but it is more important to pay more attention to professional and authoritative awards - such as the Oscars, union awards, Golden Globes. The People's Choice Awards want to establish themselves as both an authoritative award in the selection and professional categories, but it just needs to go through it step by step.

……

As a nascent award, the influence of the Public Choice Award is not small, but there is no way to compare it with the Oscars, so it was quickly overshadowed by the discussion about the Oscars. The list of Oscar nominees is still relatively far away, so speculating on this list has become a job that everyone enjoys.

For the People's Choice Awards, while breathing a sigh of relief, it is inevitable that there will also be a sense of loss - in Hollywood, any award will feel lost in front of the Oscars. (To be continued.) )