No one will be satisfied with the list of winners of the Golden Globes - except for the winners, not just because the expected winners did not appear, but because the Golden Globe Awards' cake-sharing technology is so bad that people complain about their powerlessness, and the awards of the six major acting departments are completely out of order, and the only slightly more reliable is Nicolas Cage's title of drama actor, at least in terms of performance completion and relative strength, this is well deserved, but in the context of the entire list of winners, It makes people laugh and cry.

Now people have begun to discuss enthusiastically, at this year's Oscars, will Hugo, who once again attacked the actor Xiaojinren, lose to Nicholas? If that's the case, then this entanglement is really unclear. More importantly, the possibility is very high.

Nicholas's deep and heavy performance in "Far from the Casino" did indeed win critical acclaim, and when the film was released at the end of October, many people thought it was likely to bring him an Oscar-winning statuette. At that time, "The Seven Deadly Sins" was being screened, but Hugo's anonymous name must have hit the supporting role department and did not pose a threat to Nicholas, and the legendary "Death Row Walk" had not yet been opened, so Nicholas deservedly became the first candidate for the actor.

Even after the release of "Death Row Walk", it was generally believed that Nicholas and Hugo were evenly matched, although from a technical point of view, Hugo had a slight advantage; But the acting skills are not high or low, they can accurately express the role, let the audience feel the power of the role, even if it is a true performance, it should be praised, so in terms of the completion of the role, Nicholas is indeed not inferior to Hugo.

Now, the Golden Globes have given their answer, and they have chosen to support Nicholas in favor of Hugo for the ironic Best Actor in a Musical Comedy, which makes the Oscars even more elusive two months later.

The reason why "America Weekly" reported with such an aggressive headline as "Ugly Results" is obviously not just because of Hugo alone.

In the race for best screenplay, Hugo, who played "Before Sunrise", lost again to Emma Thompson, who wrote "Sense and Sensibility", and Tim Robbins, who played "Death Row Walk", and Aaron Sorkin in "The White House".

What does this mean? It means that Hugo, who was full of beauty in the nomination stage, finally won a painless Best Actor in a Musical Comedy just by relying on "Before Sunrise", and "Seven Deadly Sins" and "Death Row Walk" returned empty-handed.

Should this be celebrated or should not be celebrated? Charlize Theron, a co-actor in the same drama who accepted the award on behalf of Hugo at the Golden Globes, did not say anything about the acceptance speech, but simply said "thank you" and made a hasty decision, is this because Charlize is the relationship between the substitute leader, or Hugo's true attitude?

No one knows if the final list of winners of the Ballon d'Or is directly linked to Hugo's absence - and even if there is, there is no evidence, but there is no doubt that the relationship between Hugo and the Ballon d'Or will be present next year?

Regardless of what happens next year, at least this year, the news media will not be going to let go of the Golden Globes, and the remarks of "American Weekly" have won the support of countless media reporters.

The reporters weren't alone with Hugo, of course, — they weren't so friendly, but because the Golden Globes were so unbelievable in the acting category that the Hollywood Foreign Press Association was almost in a situation that the Foreign Press Association of Hollywood was in a situation that was almost pointed out by a thousand people.

"From 'Smell a Woman' to 'The Righteous Sea', from 'Sleepless in Seattle' to 'Schindler's List', from 'Pulp Fiction' to 'Before Sunrise', from 'The Seven Deadly Sins' to 'Death Row Walk', Hugo Lancaster has dedicated eight absolute masterpieces in the past four years, in which he has created characters with very different personalities and distinct images, and with delicate and restrained yet explosive performances, he has created one classic image after another on the screen.

Especially in the last year, Hugo's acting skills ushered in a full explosion, the chic and casual but gentle and slender Jesse, the calm and elegant but cruel but cruel and bloody Anonymous, the violent and cruel but fragile and painful Matthew, Hugo injected irreplaceable souls into the three characters, so that these characters came out of the screen and came to us, telling the true stories one by one.

It may be too early to discuss Hugo's place in the history of cinema, but there is no doubt that Hugo is one of the best actors of his time, especially considering that he is only 28 years old.

It's unimaginable that eight completely different movies, eight characters with different styles, and eight wonderful performances only brought Hugo a Golden Globe trophy for Best Actor in a Musical Comedy, not the soul-baptizing acting skills of "Death Row Walk", nor the soul-making acting skills of "Seven Deadly Sins", just a Best Actor in a Musical Comedy.

This is Hugo's final report after four years of eight nominations for the Ballon d'Or.

Such an ugly result has made all the Yiqiē languages lose their color, we just need to quietly look at this list of winners, and then make our own judgment in our hearts.

I couldn't help but think: maybe Hugo made the right choice. ”

This report from "America Weekly" is undoubtedly sharp and sharp, pointing all the fingers at the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, but this report with extreme views is impossible to refute. Indeed, perhaps purely for the roles played by Nicholas and Hugo, the "Far from the Casino" award was the least controversial of the six acting categories, and even "America Weekly" did not mock Nicholas because they knew it was due to Nicholas' prowess.

But the awarding of any award is not so simple, taking the Oscars as an example, in addition to the strength of the actor, the actor's contribution to Hollywood is also a major factor, in other words, the "guilt ticket", such as Jeff Bridges (Jeff. Bridges) in 2009 in "Crazy. heart)", is it the best performance of his career? Apparently not. Jeff had already won four Oscar nominations for acting, but had received nothing, so in that year, he defeated Colin Firth, who was even better. Firth) and Morgan Freeman, who won his first Little Man statuette.

From this point of view, Hugo's eight Golden Globe nominations in four years only received such a result, which is really indignant, which can definitely be called an insult to Hugo Chiguoguo by the Golden Globe Awards.

Therefore, the report of "America Weekly" not only did not cause an uproar of controversy and crusade, but also won the support and applause of its media peers.

In addition to Hugo, the other names in the list of winners also make people complain.

"Sharon Stone relied on acting to beat Susan Sarandon, Meryl Streep and Emma Thompson, and that's good, it's a headline that catches the eye." It's from the headline of the Chicago Tribune, full of dark humor and mockery. Indeed, at any time in history, such a title has a strong mocking effect, and even if one agrees that the performance in "Las Vegas" is the best performance of Sharon's career, a prefix must be added - the only outstanding performance of her career, and it is even more eclipsed by her competitors.

"Who is Mira Sovino? Also, Woody Allen has a new work? This is the news of the winner of the Best Supporting Actress in "Variety" magazine, and on the newcomer, Kate Winslet's amazing performance in "Sense and Sensibility" has sparked countless discussions so far; In terms of veteran actors, Angelica Houston, who was nominated for three Oscars and won Best Supporting Actress in 1985, is still impressive this time, while Mira's stand out is puzzling - of course, when you see Woody's name written in the director and screenwriter columns, this situation may be explained.

"The struggle between reason and emotion, emotion won the final victory." This clever news story comes from The Hollywood Reporter, the industry's most professional magazine, in a press release:

"The Hollywood Foreign Press Association, which has always played Tai Chi extremely skillfully, once again gave a perfect performance, with ten awards including Best Picture, Best Director, six acting categories, and Best Screenplay, and the only thing that coincided was the 'Sense and Sensibility' that won Best Picture in the Drama category and Best Screenplay, and the ten trophies belonged to nine films, and it was definitely a night of great triumph for all the works.

But this time the Golden Globe performance may be a failure.

'Sense and Sensibility', which won the best film in the drama category, 'Baby Pig', which won the best picture in the musical comedy category, and 'Braveheart', which won the best director, are three completely different works, the core theme of the work, the shooting techniques used by the director, and the ideas shown by the characters in the story are all different styles, and the Golden Globe Awards have commended these three works at the same time, which shows the Golden Globe Awards' broad-mindedness, but also reflects the Golden Globes' uncertainty about the ideas and concepts of the awards.

When the Golden Globes thought they had succeeded in hosting a national carnival, they had lost the heart of the ceremony in the spotlight and turned it into a bustling puppet show: the cheers were loud, but the stage was nothing more than soulless puppets.

Looking at the entire list of winners, the only winner was 'Sense and Sensibility', and their number of winners was two. This is a loss and a tragedy for an awards ceremony. ”

Normally, there is a winner at the awards ceremony, and at least three trophies will be awarded, otherwise it will only look unconvincing - the winner of the best picture will only receive one more affirmation? Does that mean that this so-called best picture is not so good, and is it not much different from the quality of other works?

Therefore, the "Hollywood Reporter" hit the nail on the head to point out the greed and missteps of the Golden Globe Awards, not to mention the six acting departments that have become a laughing stock.

The 53rd Golden Globe Awards has come to an end, but such a result makes it difficult to rejoice.