Today, it opened high and went low, at 5,000 points, the Shanghai Composite Index released a volume of 749.9 billion in the morning, but it could not stand. Everyone should still be cautious and pay attention to observing, if there is another wave of sharp decline like yesterday, this time it may not be as fast as yesterday.

Yesterday, someone reminded that yesterday was the 4th of June, which was a sensitive day, and the June 4 tragedy was not allowed. So then it pulled up again. Maybe after 5,000 points, when everyone is paralyzed, it will fall sharply.

I just read Yuming's blog, and once again continuously prompted the adjustment risk, I also think that yesterday's high-level hanging neckline is more dangerous, after all, it fell sharply yesterday, and Yuming also predicted it, but it was pulled up later. But the early warning was successful.

In addition, I took a look at the supreme retail investors recommended the day before yesterday, and the author is also prompting to escape the top. In addition, some readers reported that there was a big bad news coming out of the weekend. To be honest, technical indicators are relatively fragile in the face of bearishness. I mainly have a bad premonition, because after the 6% drop on May 28, the official media rarely did not comment, only the Xinhua News Agency said a few words, and was relieved.

Now there are rumors flying all over the sky, and I don't know which one is true and which one is false. However, it is a bit dangerous for the market to stand unstable by 5,000 points. After all, there have been two major adjustments at 4900 points. 5,000 points of this breakthrough gap - not to make up is the best, now the morning of the day to make up, and fell below 5,000 points, the morning of the Shanghai market reached 749.9 billion, can be described as a day, is indeed a more dangerous signal, this time to be more cautious, control the position, leave room for maneuver.

At this sensitive moment, it is most important to control the position first and ensure the safety of the principal, and the above opinions are for your reference only. (To be continued......)