After Koyanagi closed this post, he continued to read other posts.

Not all posts are like that, otherwise it's really an operation, not a normal situation that should occur. A lot of posts are discussing Koyanagi's plot.

For example, this theme post: Is the young man in the first story a criminal or not? I heard the old policeman say that he knew it was a murderer by looking at his eyes! It occurred to me that the old cop might be right.

Reply 1: Yes, and the young man at the end will kill you next.

I think this arrangement is to show that the purpose of this novel, and the lawyer should uphold, is to restore the procedural justice in a common law system (case law), "which refers to the fairness of the adjudication process (relative to the adjudication result) and the justice of the legal process (relative to the substantive conclusion)." ”

Reply 2: I think it's the murderer

Reply 3: There is no point in discussing this issue, you don't understand it at all; Even the author of the novel, Koyanagi, will not be sure whether he is a murderer or not, and it doesn't matter at all whether he is a murderer or not; It's already so clear in the novel, I don't even bother to quote it, I don't understand it, go back and read it again, don't read it if you don't understand it.

Reply 4: It doesn't make sense, it's not a lawyer's concern

Reply 5: It's pretty much the same as the end of Level 1 Fear. But it doesn't matter who the murderer is (laughs)

Reply 6: Insufficient evidence to acquit the acquittal is the same everywhere

Reply 7: The author wants to say: the truth is never something we can't see

Reply 8: I think the last scene smacks of paying homage to the Simpson case in the United States. As the first floor said, in the world of law, procedural justice is greater than factual justice, which also means that general justice is greater than individual justice. Procedural fairness is essential for a sound judicial system.

Of course, it is true that this situation may be the case where true justice is not served in some cases, but it is even more terrible than the case in China where a man was convicted of killing his wife, and his wife returned from a foreign place eleven years later to be rehabilitated. In other words, procedural fairness and factual fairness are the game of "it is better to kill a thousand by mistake than to kill a person by mistake" and "if you can kill a thousand by mistake than to kill a person by mistake".

Reply 9: The core of this novel is that we are trying to protect the interests of our clients, and whether he is a murderer or not has nothing to do with whether we are serious about performing our duties as lawyers. Justice is not the mission of lawyers, victory is justice.

If after reading this novel, you are still so entangled in the details, then you don't need to read it a second time. I'm looking forward to it, the author's second novel, this one must have a sequel, absolutely!!

Reply 10: Form is important, but so is truth.

Reply 11: I don't think this case has anything to do with procedural fairness, because the cross-examination of the case is not all illegal confessions. And the people inside are not very clear whether the man killed or not, and the facts of Simpson's case are obvious.

Reply 12: The same question also appeared in "The Good Wife", but whether the murderer is really has little to do with the lawyer, they are only responsible for protecting the interests of the client.

Reply 13: Legally he is no longer a murderer! No two guilty verdicts!

Reply 14: I think it's a murderer, and the heroine is a brain-dead who has lost all her wealth to save the murderer!!! Dislike! Super nasty!!

Reply 15: We are not gods and can never know the truth! Legal arbitration is a victory if there is no problem!

Reply 16: Finally, the next sentence will kill you, and I am so scared that I can't sleep well at night...... It's so gloomy to say ⊙_⊙‖

Reply 17: It doesn't matter to us whether it's the murderer or not. Why this as the first story? Personally, I think that's what the author of the novel wants to tell us! The truth of the whole case and the duty of a lawyer are completely different things. Yes, it's very clear in the play. If you really wonder if that person is the murderer. Well, I can only say that I didn't understand the meaning of this novel.

To put it simply: whether that person is a murderer or not, that is a matter of detective reasoning novels, and the main significance of this drama is that the lawyer takes money to help the client clear his name.

Reply 18: It should be the murderer, but the lawyer needs to ensure procedural justice, and the truth is not important. This CA color feels very similar to a CA color in the British drama "Royal Lawyer", the CA color in "Master of Escape", and "First Degree Fear". But it's really terrifying, for example, after the male protagonist of "Master of Escape" helped the real murderer get rid of the murder crime without knowing the truth, he was acquitted, and the result was that the tiger returned to the mountain, resulting in his wife being killed.

Reply 19: Don't dwell on the truth when watching "H", because this novel does not have a God's perspective like other novels, and it will be pursued to the end! So, that's what makes this novel so special!

Reply 20: There is not enough evidence that he is the murderer. Think about the occurrence of unjust, false and wrongly decided cases......

This post is very popular, and there is a series of replies below, Koyanagi took a closer look at the reply number, and there were 1341!

"I'll go, Yahoo is really extraordinary, it's Niu X, there are 1,300 replies to a casual post, and I've been on Twitter from yesterday to now, and more than 10,000 replies are already a little complacent, and now it seems that I'm still far behind?" Koyanagi shrugged his shoulders a little self-deprecatingly and continued to read.

I've probably read more than a hundred replies, and the following replies have begun to be a little repetitive, so there's no need to read them on.

Koyanagi clicked on the other posts.

Title: Why is the mercenary Kensuke willing to accept Machiko's offer of a 42-year labor contract?

In other words, isn't this 42-year labor contract a long-term one?

As long as Machiko doesn't act in a way that harms the firm during the contract, Kensuke will continue to hire her and pay her salary.

This setting is too weird, according to Kensuke's consistent performance in the novel, shouldn't you scoff at it, and then put forward the heroine of the morning drama with one kick?

Reply 1: Cheap labor~!

Reply 2: Do you want to be more serious? In reality, a simple and beautiful girl in her twenties like Machiko is willing to follow a man, and with the working environment of the two-person world, will a normal 38-year-old single man refuse? Will it be, will it be, will it be?

Reply 3: I remember Gu Meimeng said to Miki, "You let go of the wrong person", which means that he is actually quite optimistic about Xiao Dai!

Reply 4: What the hell is Gu Meimeng! But what the upstairs said is very true.

Reply 5: Needless to say, there are more illusory reasons such as being optimistic about the juniors, just by calculating the economic accounts, you can see that the salary he gives Dai is very low, and it is definitely cost-effective. Dai only owes him a total of 30 million yen, and he has to pay it back for 42 years, that is to say, he only pays back 714,000 yuan per year, and they say that it is good to use 25% of his income to pay it back, and it can be calculated that Dai's annual income is only 71.4/25% = 2.857 million yen, and this income will remain unchanged for 42 years. Part-time jobs at Yoshinoya in Tokyo earn about 1,100 yen per hour, and if you work 8 hours a day, 22 days a week, 12 months a year. The annual income of a handyman at Yoshinoya is 1,100 * 8 * 22 * 12 = 2,323,000. It's basically the same as Dai. Dai's work intensity is definitely greater than 8 hours a day, 22 days a month, right? The difference in technical content will not be mentioned. In other words, Gumeimen hired a college graduate with a lawyer's license at the salary of a temporary dishwasher, and this salary level remained unchanged for 42 years! Anyone would like it......

Seeing the fifth reply, the various data expressed, Xiaoyanagi couldn't help but burst out laughing, this is really true!

So, these, readers, are really cute!