Just like last year's "Forrest Gump", "Vulgar" and "The Shawshank Redemption", this year's competition also makes it difficult for people to choose, especially the showdown between Hugo and Nicolas Cage, which has become a topic of conversation since the release of "Death Row Walk", and has continued to major award ceremonies, and then reached a white-hot stage because of the Golden Globe Awards, and the Berlin Film Festival has pushed the debate value of the topic to the peak!

The academy's double nomination of Hugo's acting skills has made the problem even more complicated, and the already uncertain answer has now become even more elusive and unpredictable.

Not to mention the general audience, even the entertainment reporters in the circle are arguing, almost everyone has their own answers, you can imagine the inner struggle and pain of the college judges when voting, which also makes tomorrow night's awards ceremony even more interesting.

Nicholas looked at the reporter in front of him who was arguing more and more fiercely, smiled dumbly, and turned to look at James, "Even if they fight hard, so what?" We weren't the ones who voted. ”

James also laughed, "It shows that the topic effect is strong enough this time." ”

Generally speaking, entertainment journalists will not have such a strong sense of substitution, because they clearly know that the industry is so operable, and the Oscar statuette is not able to rely on the lips of media reporters, and it is difficult to say what kind of choice the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences with more than 5,000 members will make, which is also one of the biggest charms of the Oscars. It's like the "sanity and emotion" that accidentally fell behind in the nomination stage, which really surprised many people. So journalists generally look at it from an objective point of view -- not as an honor, but as a feast, a pie, a news topic.

This time, however, something is different.

At the 66th Oscars, Hugo won the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor with "Schindler's List", becoming the second youngest winner in film history after Timothy Hutton; The following year, Hugo won a round of applause from the public opinion circle with his admirable delicate and humorous performance in "Vulgar", and even many people thought that he could become emperor in one fell swoop, but as a result, he became the foil for Tom Hanks' history; This year, Hugo ushered in a big explosion of acting, and almost everyone thought that this was Hugo's year.

But the Golden Globes said "no" to this, which instantly made the trend of the entire awards ceremony interesting, and the topic effect generated by Hugo as the core quickly swept the entire North American continent: is it the anonymous who chooses the "Seven Deadly Sins" or Matthew who chooses the "Death Row Walk"? Where will the head-to-head showdown between Hugo and Brad Pitt end up? Will there be an unexpected outcome to the rivalry between Hugo and Nicolas Cage? Can Hugo win Best Original Screenplay?

The most important thing is that Hugo, who has won three nominations for acting, can he win the Golden Man again after "Schindler's List", pushing the strong momentum of the past few years to the peak; Or will it be too much, and in the end, you will return empty-handed?

If such an amazing year had been missed, would Hugo have been able to replicate such a miracle again? If he doesn't win the prize this year, does it mean that Hugo will never have a chance again? Will it flourish and decline, and from then on it will begin to go downhill, repeating the path after the original "Death Poets Society"?

Countless suspense and countless question marks completely affect people's sense of expectation.

Hugo won the National Society of Review Award, the Screen Actors Guild Award, the Los Angeles Film Critics Association Award, the Chicago Film Critics Association Award and the Berlin Film Festival, while Nicolas Cage won the National Film Critics Association Awards, the New York Film Critics Circle Awards, the San Francisco Film Critics Circle Awards, the Boston Film Critics Circle Awards and the Golden Globe Awards. It is difficult to distinguish between victory and defeat.

Strictly speaking, Nicolas Cage also had a slight upper hand, as Hugo won the Silver Bear for Best Actor at the Berlin Film Festival.

Although it is said that after Hugo returned from Berlin, the situation of the Golden Globes has become extremely embarrassing, but in fact, everyone knows that the tastes of Berlin and the Oscars are completely different, on the contrary, the taste of the Golden Globes is the closest to the Oscars.

As of 1996, only three of the winners of the Berlinale History for Best Actor and Best Actress were crowned at the Oscars: Sidney Poitier in 1963. Poitier), Lee Marvin in 1965. Marvin) and Tom Hanks in 1994.

It can be seen that the Oscars do not agree with the aesthetic concept of the Berlin Film Festival, and many people even joke that the winner of the Best Actor and Best Actress at the Berlin Film Festival in February can directly declare that he has no chance to win the Oscars.

In the past five years, the Golden Globe Awards and Oscar winners have been consistent four times, and the actress has been synchronized five times in a row.

This is also an important reason for the uproar after the Golden Globe Awards, everyone thinks that Hugo has the upper hand this year, and it is definitely a good opportunity to win the award, but the result is that Nicholas has suddenly risen to dominate the Golden Globe Awards, and the other five departments of the Golden Globes this year are also in chaos, which has created the chaos that Qianfu refers to.

Later, with Hugo winning the Silver Bear for Best Actor at the Berlin Film Festival - although the aesthetic fit is not high, but it still makes the suspense come back, can Hugo create a zào miracle again?

It can be said that such a huge suspense has ignited the curiosity of even the media reporters who are participants, they are witnesses, participants, and founders of Hugo's brilliant career in the past few years, so they are more enthusiastic, more excited and more excited than anyone else, which makes them join the hot discussion.

However, as the last voice just said, the nominees have a chance, not just Hugo and Cage.

At present, Massimo Trosi of "The Postman" and Anthony Hopkins of "Nixon Biography" are temporarily behind, but Richard Dreyfus has also shown hard power that is not inferior to Hugo and Cage, but it is only drowned out because of the slightly weaker topicality.

Richard, 49, is also an important figure in Hollywood, and his famous work is George Lucas's "American Painting", and then he also served as Steven Spielberg's "Jaws" and "The Third Kind of Contact" (close). enters。 of。 the。 third。 kind)" and became the youngest actor in Oscar history when he upset Woody Allen and John Travolta at the 50th Oscars, becoming the youngest actor in Oscar history - he was only 30 years and 156 days old when he won the award. This record has been held until today, when this year's Oscars are about to kick off.

As we all know, the Oscars in the Best Actor department always pay more attention to the qualifications of actors, most of the golden age for actors to win awards is after the age of forty, and so far above the 68th Oscars, there are only six actors under the age of 35.

At the age of thirty-four, Clark Gable relied on "the night wind." Flow" for the first time, James Stewart at the age of thirty-three relied on the "Philadelphia Story" (the. Philadelphia)" was awarded to Marlon Brando, who was about to turn thirty-one with "Marina Storm", Maximilian. At the age of thirty-one, he won the Golden Man with the "Nuremberg Trials", and Daniel Day-Lewis was only thirty-two when he was crowned emperor with "My Left Foot". Then there's Richard, who broke the record for the youngest to win the award.

And, in the mid-sixties, the judges began to scoff at handsome guys, and the likes of Clark Gable, Marlon Brando, and James Stewart were all but extinct in their thirties, unless they were old – Paul Newman, for example.

This year, Richard gave a wonderful performance in "Life Because You Listen", ushering in another peak of his acting career, although the momentum is not as good as Hugo and Cage, but no one can deny his absolute strength. It can be said that if Richard breaks the shackles and wins the award this year, it will also be a new record, and he will join Marlon Brando, Tom Hanks and others to become the seventh actor in film history to win the best actor twice.

Of course, if Hugo or Nicholas wins the award, this will be even more historical, they can all join the ranks of the actor under the age of 35, and Hugo will be the first winner to break the record in film history and become the first winner to start with the word "two".

Especially considering that Hugo is only twenty-eight years old, and he is still a handsome guy, which also puts a layer of fog over the whole landscape. You must know that less than 10% of the actors who were nominated for the first time were younger than 30 years old, and after the 80s, a premise was added: he can't be a handsome guy.

But it is under this unfavorable condition that Hugo has the qualifications that Oscar values most, and Hugo has it all, the achievements of historical works, the contributions of acting skills over the years, etc., absolutely meet the requirements, and the strong momentum of last year's three works cannot be ignored, which also makes all possibilities open and full of countless unknowns.

Hugo's challenge to record the journey can be described as a process of "impacting the impossible". Coupled with the Golden Globe Awards and the Berlin Film Festival, not to mention the journalists, even the management of major production companies, top directors and producers, and behind-the-scenes staff are full of expectations for this year's Oscars, and everyone is waiting for a result. Perhaps, it is the moment to witness the miracle.

"No matter who wins the award, it's a night that makes history in zào, isn't it?" Nicholas McKenna smiled at James Rattle and said with a smile before turning away from the crowd and heading towards the Los Angeles Times' workspace.

But other reporters still gathered around and debated fiercely: Where will this year's Oscar winners go? ――17075+d6su9h+10851825――>