I saw a particularly stupid kind of book review!
It's just stupid!
I see that some readers like to say that I know what you write after reading the table of contents, as a way to show that I am an old bookworm, I am very good, and I have read a lot of books!
I don't even want to say how stupid this idea is!
You can understand it because we, as authors, try to write the core points and highlights of a chapter on the table of contents name, so that you can understand it!
It's not that you read a lot of books, you know! It's that we want you all to read it more easily, smoothly, and not so complicated!
If all my catalogs were only Chapter 1, Chapter 2, Chapter 3, would you give me a guess?
There are so many stupid book reviews like that!
The key is that I don't feel stupid, and I feel proud, I've really encountered a lot since I wrote the book, for example, many people say, this book plagiarizes and devours the starry sky, why, the younger brother of the male protagonist in the devouring starry sky is crippled, and the sister of the male protagonist in my book is not in good health, and it is plagiarized at first glance. Pen @ fun @ pavilion wWw. ļ½ļ½ļ½Uļ½Eć ļ½ļ½ļ½ļ½
In fact, when I write it now, it doesn't seem like everyone knows it in their hearts!
And what I've seen is even more outrageous, saying that there are so many geniuses in that book (I won't say what book it is), and there are so many geniuses in your book, and you tell me that you are not plagiarizing?
It's not like I'm being funny, it's true that someone said that!
Actually, I don't object to some readers to put forward opinions, but I'm really annoyed by the kind of superiority that is high, the authors are all stupid, only I am the most genius, the person I know best!
Saying so much, I just want to share with you that there are many people who are really stupid, but I don't think that I am stupid and have to come out to show, I am really drunk!