I have to say that the box office of "Iron Man" is indeed climbing wildly, but when the American music festival is coming, on the other hand, the other two movies are also crazy to promote, and they also want the box office to soar in another aspect.

The movie "The Hobbit" originally won the approval of others at the box office, and his box office was actually not too weak compared to Iron Man, so at this time, "The Hobbit 1" can be said to be appreciated by countless people.

On the other hand, the movie "The Hobbit 1" was even more highly praised by the famous film critic Colryant.

The film reviews he published are like this -

"Why do I say this movie is better than The Lord of the Rings?

"As if I couldn't wait to prove to the whole theater that I was the best home, I skipped work to see The Hobbit on the day of the release. When I came back, the British basically asked me the following three questions:

What do you think?

Is it 2D or 3D?

Which is better than the Lord of the Rings?

The answer to the first question: great. There's so much to carry in this film, and I think the best thing about it is that it embodies the human imagination to a level that has never been seen before. Dale, Erebor, and Rivendell's CG has done a great job, especially when Rivendell flashes out of the valley and the cascading waterfalls around the cliffs glitter in the sunset, and I think that scene brings tears to Tolkien himself.

The answer to the second question, if you have the conditions, please see 3DiMAXHFR, but if it is an ordinary screen, I don't think 3D makes much sense.

As for the third question. My answer is. I think it's more than the Lord of the Rings. There are many factors. First of all, I have to think about my own problems. When the Lord of the Rings came out, I was just a little boy with a sparse aesthetic, a lower love for Middle-earth than I do now, a stage where I knew almost nothing about British culture, and I didn't do any homework when I watched the first two books. And before watching Hobbit this time, I discussed it with the British in the office for almost two months, which is also the second possible factor, that is, I watched Hobbit in England. For China, Tolkien may have been just a pastime. Great is foreign literature, but in England it is part of the culture, seeping into everyone's blood. The people you think are the least likely to read magical literature can talk to you about Middle-earth.

And I think the most important reason, and one of the things I scoff at about The Hobbit in the first place, is that it cuts a little book into three movies.

Again, I'm going to review my preconceived notions, and although I don't know how much I have suffered in this regard, I admit that I am just one of the people who said, "The Lord of the Rings is one by one." The hobbit is a kind of children's literature that is cut into three parts, and PJ is colluding with Warner to cheat money". A lot of people started out thinking the same way as me. And this idea is more or less based on a basic idea: the Lord of the Rings is already very good, and it can't be filmed like that, PJ must have ulterior motives for making other moths, and no matter how you say that the Hobbit movie can't be better than this one.

And reality slapped me hard in the face.

Chopping a book into three gives the Hobbit a chance that every little detail in the book is revealed. Some of the details don't even come from the hobbits, like Balin explaining Thorin to everyone? The origin of the oak shield name is actually from ROTK, but I'm content with this insertion, some people may say that Cheesy is deliberately sensational, what's the matter, I like it.

And this joy of grasping every little detail reminded me of the shortcomings of the Lord of the Rings, and awakened those who I was not satisfied with at the time. For example, I told Fufu that Eowyn was completely portrayed as a fangirl in the ROTK movie. Space is limited, and there is too little foreshadowing. One second he was still dead and alive in front of the human emperor, and the next second he saw the prime minister at the head of the wall of Gondor, and he immediately climbed. As a result of omitting or even missing a large part of Faramir and Eowyn's previous life experiences and mental activities, even if the exchange of heartfelt messages on the wall is completely expressed, it is as contrived and abrupt as the confession downstairs in the university dormitory.

Of course, this is just an example, and it doesn't make sense to compare the hobbit to this biography. Compared with the grandeur of this biography, the pattern of Hobbit is much smaller, which is destined to be more suitable for Hobbit than the shooting method of this biography that focuses on the main line. This kind of shooting also leaves many challenges for PJ, and the one I care about the most is the battle of the Five Armies, which is more like a group fight than Minastiris and the Valley of the Holy Helmet. I'm looking forward to how to exaggerate the original and at the same time achieve a sensory impact. And the first part of The Hobbit at least gave me the confidence to look forward to. ”

Because of Cleente's personality, this film review has subsequently gained the support of countless people.

"A new journey, but full of memories. The calm and abundant Charles has a trendy version of Bilbo; In the beautiful Ringvalley, Elrond and the Queen still don't eat fireworks (people only eat vegetable salad); Dried tofu still likes to dazzle people's eyes with a large light bulb of several kilowatts, and Gollum is still hateful and pitiful. Crossing the cliff and encountering the stone henge is like a replica of the Great Snow Mountain, and the IMAX3D48 frame doubles the disgusting of Oakes. For brain-dead fans, even if I shoot 30 more, I will chase it! ”

"The movie doesn't have all the familiar characters appear at the beginning, but takes turns like old friends, until Gollum appears, and all the memories spring out and collapse... Although it feels too similar to "The Lord of the Rings", the excitement of the last hour is enough to rekindle the passion for the cooling of the previous game. A new chapter, and then set off, "all encounters in the world are indeed reunions after a long absence". ”

"It was really great. I think that although the plot is not as expansive as the Lord of the Rings, breaking down a book into three movies gives PJ the best chance to restore every detail of the original book, and every detail carries too much emotion. As soon as the opening theme song sounded, tears welled up in my eyes, and every moment of tears after that. SirIan, Song of the Lonely Mountain, Rivendell, Gelladriel's glorious turn. And the Wind King......"

……

It has to be said that a powerful water army plays a huge role at this time. In their opinion, as long as the publicity of "The Hobbit 1" is maximized, then other aspects can be ignored.

But the Yankees, who have been invincible in the past, have forgotten one thing, that is, this time the movie is not only "The Hobbit 1" is being released, it can be said that the two movies "Minority Report" and "Iron Man 2" have also given "The Hobbit 1" a higher level of change.

Many people are even angry that "The Hobbit" is such a mercenary army!

"It's ugly!! The Lord of the Rings: I think it's boring enough to walk along the way, this piece continues to walk around, gather people, and your mother sings, spits smoke rings, shoots MV, and the elf queen also stands on a rotating tray and circles out in circles, I spray soda, I think that the magician 60 years ago will be more powerful, the same will only be a fart, and finally the eagle will save it directly, why not throw the orc in the valley by the way? And there are eagles who ride fart horses, climb fart mountains, and fly directly."

"At 169 minutes, there is no convincing climax in the whole film, and it inevitably seems a little lengthy. There are too many processes of self-interpretation, and the foreshadowing of the grand world view is slightly insufficient. In addition, the times are a little old, and the impression of the first three parts has been blurred. ”

"Minus 250. Be at the end of one's forbearance. It's really boring to watch, so I watched the same film in two halls and compared the so-called 48 Zhen and what is the difference between the normal picture. The difference is that 48 Zhen is more like watching the opening animation of an online game with the effect of a TV series on a large computer screen. ”

"It's smelly and long, and it's really ugly. Maybe I'm really past the age of watching these kinds of movies. When the dwarves appeared, they were ugly enough, and after the monsters came out, they suddenly felt that the dwarves had become handsome guys. Is the director deliberately disgusting the audience? When that monster with a lump in the jaw appeared, I literally wanted to throw up. The 3D glasses hung on the bridge of my nose for almost three hours, and I felt like my nose was collapsing. In addition, English is really the lingua franca of the world, and as far away as Middle-earth, English is popularly spoken. ”

…………

I have to say, no matter what era. In short, the audience's eyes are bright, and it is precisely because of this that many people do not have any other reaction to the promotion of "The Hobbit 1".

In their opinion. This movie is garbage at all, and garbage movies are not worth watching.

In the midst of these promotions, the box office of "Iron Man 2" has risen with a strong countercurrent, and many people are also crazy praise for "Iron Man".

"1. On the recent global premiere of "Iron Man 2", as a fan who admires Iron Man very much, I decisively bought the first ticket. As a result, the film became an exclusive myth for me. I also deeply appreciated the benefits of watching movies alone. You don't have to spend your tongue explaining the ins and outs to the fake-movie fans, and you can freely get hooked on the excitement without worrying about getting the rolls of the eyes around you. The most important thing is to communicate with the screening room at will, for example, the picture is pasted, the sound effect is weak, don't rush to turn on the lights and leave the scene after the subtitles are finished, there are easter eggs, and so on.

2. The overall plot of "Iron Man 2" adopts a multi-clue structure, which needs to explain Iron Man VS Whiplash, Stark Industries VS Congressional Military, Tony. Stark's search for new energy to maintain his own lifespan, the predecessor of the Avengers, and the lack of success of Stark Industries after Pepper's promotion to CEO are a little difficult. The result of this is that the whole film has a large capacity, but the focus is not clear enough. This reminds me of the "Spider-Man 3" that tried to break through from multiple angles but was wildly criticized by fans.

3. One of the highlights of the film is the briefcase called "CASE" in the film, which is not revealed until the moment of crisis - a portable version of Iron Man armor (featured in this trailer). Fans shouted accordingly that Iron Man is becoming more and more like a Transformer.

4. Scarlett. Johnson's new role, Black Widow (a female agent of S.H.E.E.I.L.D.), is a big hit! In addition to Scarlett's own unique temperament and beauty, the black widow shape created by costume designer Mary Zophers is also quite exquisite, compared to the original comics

5. The most blatant product placement in "Iron Man 2" is this shot: Stark is leisurely lying on his side on the giant advertising props of a certain brand of bagels. The setting of this plot itself is meant to amuse you, so bear with it.

6. In terms of cameo appearances, Iron Man's cameo is very strong, whether it is to play a role in a dragon (he has been active in the third season of "Spider-Man", "Fantastic Four", and "The Big Bang Theory" many times before). Steven Wong said that it was in the same scene of the opening of Stark Industries that he saw the CEO of Oracle. I don't really know this person, but I did hear about Oracle.

7. About Stark Industries' competitor Hammer Industries. The name HAMMER comes from the literal English translation of HAMMER. WHY HAMMER? I am not responsible for gossip, but in Marvel Comics' 2009 short story collection DarkReign, Iron Man was suspended from S.H.I.E.L.D for being responsible for the "Secret Invasion" incident. Spider-Man's enemy, Green Goblin, stole Iron Man's armor and created his own Iron Suit, calling himself "Captain America of Steel", and reorganizing the Aegis (S.H.E.I.L.D) as "Sky Hammer". This hammer is called H.A.M.M.E.R.

So there are three possibilities: 1) The screenwriter paved the way for future Avengers films, and this Hammer is likely to make a comeback and become a sponsor of the Sky Hammer Organization. 2) The screenwriter felt that the end of 2012 was approaching, and the Avengers movie could not be filmed in the Dark Dynasty, so he borrowed the name of the Sky Hammer. 3) I think too much about egg pain.

8. Notice the object on the table in this scene (the film even gives a certain amount of space, which Stark calls the "Ferris wheel"). I've read in books that it appears to be a perpetual motion model, invented in 1150 by the Indian philosopher Bhaskara, which uses the imbalance of the weights of the wheels to keep them back to their original positions.

9. In Stark's scenario of modifying the hardware system to create new elements, he once casually held a disc-shaped object under the laser emitter. The S.H.I.E.L.D. official was surprised and said, "You don't know what this thing means." What does this disc-shaped, broken object with a five-pointed star in the center mean?

That's Captain America's most iconic round shield! (Still paving the way for next year's "Captain America" and 2012's "The Avengers")

10. About the easter eggs after the subtitles of the film. After the credits were raised in the cinema, I sat for six minutes, waiting for the easter eggs after the subtitles, which even made the projection staff and the clearance staff very unhappy for a while. Unexpectedly, there was no follow-up after the subtitles, and the theater manager's explanation was that the film copy was already like this when it was taken from China Film Group. This fully shows that China Film Group has not done enough homework.

…………

Another aspect of the madness of "Iron Man" is that the Grammys have been postponed. (To be continued......)