In the history of the evil society, the behavior of self-"whooshing" is still very open-minded, and has sent airplane cups (the day before yesterday, too, Tuoye's mouth "whoo" cup) has also been sent to vibrate "whoosh" sticks, as an important way for human beings to solve the desire for "whooshing" for a long time, self-"whooshing" is also considered a normal and advantageous behavior in medicine. Compared with men's self-awareness, women's self-awareness seems to be less enlightened, today we will take a look at a research report on women's self-awareness, but here I want to ask you, what are the common words to describe women's self-awareness? There are a lot of words for men.

A national health and behavior questionnaire survey conducted by the United States through the Internet analyzed and evaluated the behavior of 2,523 women aged 18-92 in the past 90 days, including the proportion of women of different age groups who engaged in solo and partner activities, and the frequency of hand, and anal and anal sex in the past year.

The results of the survey show that contemporary women in the United States engage in a wide variety of activities both alone and with their partners, although hoop behavior is less common in older age groups. Whoop sex remains the most prevalent behaviour among women, with both hand and mouth occurring frequently, with very few women reporting anal whooping, but this is more common in younger women with partners. Here are only the results of the investigation involving the hand

1. Comparison of age groups with individual hands

More than half of women aged 18-49 have done a hand in the past 90 days, with an average of 61.4%, the highest proportion in the 25-29 age group, and 94.1% of women who are single but dating. This proportion gradually decreases with age. However, 60-69-year-old women with a partner reported a significant reduction in recent solo hand-ups compared to unpartnered women (down to 38.1%–28.4%), and about one-third of women aged 60-69 years reported recent hand-ups across all relationships and age categories. More than half of women over the age of 70 who are in a couple but do not live together report doing it alone.

Second, the frequency of the single hand

The relatively frequent solo whoops reported by women aged 18 to 39 (fewer or more times per month) rose to 48 per cent, but the prevalence of this hand-to-hand wasting gradually decreased in the older age groups.

Therefore, it seems that not only is the hand "wow" not the exclusive domain of men, but the proportion and frequency of the number of participants are not far from that of men, and the book "Wow" also talks about more surveys about women's hand "Wow" (the following is an excerpt from the book):

In Kinsey's survey, 92 percent of men and 58 percent of women have reached a high level of hand-to-hand several times in their lifetime, with the highest proportion of women reaching 62 percent, and the number of women is still increasing before the age of 45. Fifty-four per cent of women started doing it at the age of 15, and only 14 per cent started doing it after the age of 20.

For women, single women aged 18-24 do 21 times a year, compared to 37 times a year in Hunter's survey. — More often in the Met's survey: 35% of women rarely do not make a fuss, 37% several times a month, 25% several times a week, and 3% daily. This frequency is consistent across ages (up to age 55) and does not decrease with age.

So what is the number of similar hand-like surveys of Chinese women? As far as I have limited knowledge, I don't know yet. It's just that in the book "Chinese Women's Feelings and Sexuality" written by Professor Li Yinhe, a sociologist, I see the different views and practices held by Chinese female opponents: "From the perspective of behavior, it is classified as never doing, occasionally doing and often doing; In terms of attitude, it can be divided into two categories: guilty and guiltless."

As a woman, I personally believe that the hand is a free act that belongs entirely to the individual, and has nothing to do with others, society, and morality. As for whether the hand noise affects health, it depends on each person's grasp of the "quantity" of their own feelings, which is as natural as we instinctively know the amount of food we eat and our own sleep needs; If there are indeed a small number of people who have excessive hands and affect their health, in my opinion, it is not the act of making their hands themselves, but the anxiety caused by the guilt of their hands reinforcing the vicious circle.

So why did the hand rise to the moral level of "guilty and innocent", and to the "harmful, harmless" that has been debated endlessly in medical medicine throughout the ages? I was puzzled by this until I read Professor Li Yinhe's book "Foucault and Sex", and I was relieved! (The following is an excerpt from the quotation):

"There is no scientific evidence that the hand is harmful to people. We can say the least that this is the only pleasure that is harmless to people. So why ban it for so long". In Foucault's view, the purpose of power is to control the sense of "uproar" brought about by controlling the zhì. - The prohibition and persecution of opponents not only become a means for power to control people, but also bring a sense of domination to power.

- The sense of "uproar" of the regulated party comes from being watched over and suppressed by power, which can make the thing itself more exciting—the prohibited behavior appears more exciting.

The above source @ and evil society