Malik ▪ Lefik, a lifelong trafficker who transported labor to Australians, turned into a wealthy man with considerable influence.

A few years later, he also became a well-known historical memoirist, and his famous book "The Road to Freedom on the Sea - Memories of Lefick's Life" is his famous book.

Moreover, he has many identities and titles that sound quite contradictory to his profession as a trafficker, such as: "Director of the World Emancipation Campaign Committee", "Vice Chairman of the Australian Commonwealth Association for the Protection of Women's Trade and Labor Rights", "Member of the Executive Committee of the World Abolition Slavery Movement Committee", "Vice Chairman of the World Fugitive Slave Relief Committee", "Executive Director of the World Women's Congress Female Slave Human Rights Investigation Group" and so on.

He was also the head of some of the largest slave and human trafficking syndicates in the Indian Ocean region---- he was the "Chairman of the Aden Trade Labor Recruitment Company", the "Chief Director of the Muscat Slave Trading Station in Portugal" and the "Distinguished General Manager of the Labor and Trade Department of the Portuguese East India Company".

He also has another identity worth mentioning: one of the majority shareholders of the Western Pacific Federal Clipper Company, the largest specialist human trafficking transport company in the entire Indian Ocean region, which is rumored to have a background in the Australian Federal Immigration Service......

Of course, the most influential thing for the world is his memoirs and the few short stories he wrote.

The most popular is a best-selling novel called "Uncle Tom's Little Black House", in which Lefick details the scene of the first emancipation of black slaves by Australians, and it is said that this strange title was suggested by Mr. Gui Xianning, who experienced that famous historical event, who was a lifelong member of the Australian Senate and held important positions in many large multinational companies.

Later, in a memoir entitled "The First Liberation", Lefiq continued to review a series of major events in the Australian Commonwealth about the emancipation of black slaves, in which he wrote:

“...... After the enactment of the Federal Trade Labor Emancipation Act, the Act spread and became more influential as the armed merchant ships of Australians sailed to ports around the world, and the Act was later shortened to the Emancipation Act.

A few years later, the Commonwealth of Australia promulgated the Commonwealth of Non-Trade Labour Entry Act, which stipulates that all foreigners, if he or she enters the territory, sea area, vehicle, ship and any other means of transportation belonging to the Commonwealth of Australia, on the premise of his or her own volition, as long as more than one citizen of the Commonwealth of Australia is a witness, and swears allegiance to the Commonwealth Constitution and observes the laws of the Commonwealth on the spot, he shall be regarded as "trade labor" belonging to the Commonwealth of Australia.

Because this bill was obviously aimed at the fugitive slave population, so it was later called the "Fugitive Slavery Act" by the world, this bill once it was promulgated attracted the attention of Southeast Asian countries, slave owners were very nervous about this, and many slaves were trying to escape to the territory of the Australian Federation, because once recognized as "non-trade labor", they only need to serve a few years of labor in the "naturalization camp" - at most eight years, and then they can obtain freedom and land in Australia.

I have to admit that the way Australians obtain labor is very domineering, but it is indeed very popular with fugitive slaves, because a normal person with a sound personality is not willing to be a slave of others and serve a master for the rest of his life - except, of course, those who consciously and voluntarily became slaves in the Qing Dynasty......"

Later, in the collection of essays "The Mystery of the Australian Miracle", non-scholars also elaborated on this issue, and many people commented on the major impact of the series of acts promulgated by the Australian Federation on the old order of the world:

“…… The Australians clearly offended the slave owners of the world, especially the Caliphs of the East, the princes of India, the Tsars of Russia, the Emperors of the Empire of the East, and the shoguns of Japan, including the indigenous kingdoms of Southeast Asia and those who practiced caste.

The emperor and the kings were very disgusted by this series of laws of the Australian Federation, and they constantly accused the Australian Federation of engaging in double standards, saying that on the one hand, the Australians themselves were using a large number of trade slaves, and on the other hand, they were holding high "the banner of hypocritical humanism and so-called equal values, and frantically infringing on the sovereignty of other countries......

Yes, while I do think that there is a double standard on the part of the Australians, I scoff at the claims of emperors and kings, and if we look at it from a human point of view, the Australians use redemption to liberate both the slave-earner and the enslaved in a peaceful, relatively dignified way.

Yes, I use the word "liberation" because, without a proper solution, the end result will be tragic destruction and destruction, as has happened countless times in human history......

In any case, the Australian practice did deal a heavy blow to the sinful slave trade and slavery at the time, and the gradual extinction of the slave trade in the next hundred years had a lot to do with the series of laws promulgated by the Australians.

Not to mention the fact that the living conditions given to trade slaves by the Australians were confusing to the Oriental manor owners - because the standard of living of the black slaves exceeded that of all the military barracks in other countries around the world!

In the Americas, only the North American plantation owners could barely afford the same treatment as the black slaves in Australia, because the North American plantation economies were economies of scale, and the output of sugarcane, tobacco, and cotton made a lot of money.

But even on the plantations of South America, the Spanish and Portuguese would have diminished their economic benefits on the estates if they had given the slaves that kind of treatment.

However, if the slaves were not treated in this way, it would cause dissatisfaction among the slaves, and in this era of telegraphs, where the sea was everywhere and the news was transmitted all over the world in almost a week, the slaves were certainly not easy to be bullied and concealed for too long, and eventually the slaves would make all kinds of demands, and would sabotage and even sabotage and flee.

As a result, South American hacienda owners had to gradually abandon slavery, turn their plantations into workplaces for wage labor, and even return to family farms, while the thirteen British colonies in North America were the first to pass a law similar to the Australian Federal Emancipation Act a few years later, except that the length of labor was fifteen years, with settling-in payments but no land granted, and later, tobacco and banana plantations in Central and South America did the same.

Of course, unlike the American haciendas, who were only interested in economic interests, the Tsars of Russia, the Caliphs of the Saudis, the princes of India, the shoguns of Japan, and the Tatar princes who ruled the Eastern Empire were keenly aware of the danger of destabilizing their rule through this series of acts of the Australians.

These rulers were always very sensitive, and if they were wise enough, the ingenuity of the emperor was often used to consolidate his rule and that of future generations.

According to Zhu Beiguo, director of the Australian Federal Immigration Administration, although these princes and nobles preach their divine power everywhere, in their bones, those wise or relatively wise rulers know very well in their hearts that their ruling privileges come from violently depriving others of their rights.

Then, such power will face a fatal circle in legal theory: since you can deprive others of their rights by violence, then others also have the same power and the same method to deprive you of your rights.

This is the root cause of the cycle of chaos in human history.

Therefore, in most cases, these rulers are always fearful and sensitive in their hearts, which from time to time derives the psychology of tyrannical impulses, and the tyrants in human history are endless, and the so-called good emperors and good kings are rare, isn't this one of the reasons?