What I wrote yesterday was very brain-draining, I didn't sleep well, so I wrote something before I made up for sleep. Pen % fun % Pavilion www.biquge.info

A month or two ago, there was an interview in which there was a question that went something like this:

When I was studying in Lu Academy, I wrote a little something, and a teacher read it and asked: Why do the authors of your online articles write things so around? After self-examination, I found that I am used to emphasizing when I write, while traditional literature seeks to be just right and to the point, because it is beautiful.

It's not that I can't understand traditional literature, but fortunately, I still do, so I can see the reason for this difference: the audience. To give a simple example, we say the concept of "group silence", where does this concept come from, and what are the consequences caused by its production, in the hearts of readers who have really received systematic education, it only takes four words to take shape. According to the principle of output, there is concern and severity about "group silence", perhaps this person's knowledge system has been fed back to him in an instant.

But most people in this society have not formed such a mechanism - I mean more than 90 percent of the people in this society, even those who have gone to college, and even those who have obtained higher diplomas, probably do not have formed such a mechanism, then, in order to convey it thoroughly and accurately, I have to explain the ins and outs of "group silence" in 1510, so that people don't just see a term that seems cool, but really understand what it means.

It is also like a complex and profound masterpiece full of social metaphors, such as "Water Margin", only those who have a perfect logical system can see the irony and exposure contained in it. And most people will only see "the road is uneven and roars!" "Brotherly righteousness", "Eat meat, drink wine in a big bowl, and kill people happily!" ”

The enlightenment article should be clear about its direction, which is something that I understand after reading these things clearly. Among the readers I have faced, there are many people who are not without great profundity, but based on the current culture and education system of this society, there are countless people who have flaws and one-sided problems in their personal thinking system.

This problem is very complicated, for example, to truly understand "Water Margin" at the literary or philosophical level, a complete set of cultural training is required, and this training was available and directed in ancient times. In modern times, there is no such thing, because the culture has collapsed, and the chain of cultural collapse has led to the fact that the state cannot be clear about what needs to be created, and the state cannot be clear, and education cannot have a goal, and when education has no goal, the education system can only put everything that may be useful in front of you. So even if it's a book of "Water Margin", even if you have experienced higher education, you will have a variety of thoughts to read. We don't know what kind of educational direction is "right" based on modern times, and we don't dare to draw conclusions easily, but if there is no direction, it must be "wrong". Some people will say that this is freedom, this is diversity, but it is not, why not, and I am not going to explain it here.

I seem to explain a lot of things in the book, such as "heaven and earth are not benevolent", which is a deep and shallow concept in ancient times, deep because everyone avoids saying it, and shallow because it is not difficult to understand correctly after receiving professional training. But after understanding, you will find that they don't need to explain to ****, they understand it is more troublesome. In ancient times, it was right to make people weak and ignorant.

Modern times are different.

Since the existence of human rights, democracy has been a big concept and a general trend, and many fool elites say that it is better than anything else, in fact, democracy is the way of gentlemen in ancient times. When you understand logic, when you are discerning, when you are not selfish, and when you are autonomous, that is true democracy. If the people want to be independent, they must enlighten the people's wisdom, what are the requirements of the people's wisdom? Human society is like a ship sailing in a sea full of reefs, without a map, in the past, a part of the best people were at the helm, trembling and walking, a mistake, rubbing, millions of people died. In the future, let everyone be at the helm, and its requirements will be imagined by everyone. If it is the current situation of China, you say that national affairs should be voted on by the people around you, I still want to immigrate, it is not safe to immigrate to the United States, at least you have to go to Mars.

But when human rights become more and more important, and people are more and more valued, it is really possible to get you to vote, and at first it will symbolically fool you, and later, you may really be able to decide something.

Qi Minzhi mentioned it during May Fourth, but later, no one said it or did it. There are objective reasons for this, the reform and opening up over the past 30 years has been full of mud and sand, and the original meaning of existence was to use the cultural system to hold the spiritual civilization, but it did not play any role, because it had long been ruined.

When it comes to literature in the Lu Academy, the teacher said: "There are many people around me who have been sticking to it. "Perseverance is very valuable, but in the final analysis, the culture since ancient times is an elite culture, and the elite culture is for people to worship. For example, in college, we say that there is no direction in university education, but the knowledge is always there, and if you are a person with a certain degree of self-consciousness, you will definitely be able to learn something very deeply, on the contrary, if you are not self-conscious, then you will not gain anything, and there is a world of difference. Where does this realisation come from?

Thirty years of perseverance, when there is no substance, has anyone ever tried to kneel? Tried to dig out the hollow mind to guide you? After all, the basic foundation of literacy has finally been laid.

My readers, or readers of online articles, are all over the bottom of society - please understand, I am not talking about the bottom of the society, I am not despising it, because I am also - I have read the book, but there is no reason to go further, after leaving the society, I work, move bricks, work 9 to 5 civil servants, and marry to watch "The Legend of Zhen Huan", the people above say that this is very superficial. At the spiritual level, this is indeed some low-level spiritual realm, however, is it to blame these people?

If you want to pull up the social level and pursuit in a society full of desire and capital, you should do it realistically and pragmatically. Oh, and if you say "I stuck to it", do you really do everything you can? Is it enough to look on coldly and then criticize and insult and feel your superiority?

There was such a conversation during the interview.

Asked: "Is YY and Shuang a means of establishing people for you?" Is it a fun and educational approach? ”

"Well, it is a necessary means, and at the present stage, it is no less important than the pursuit of high art."

"Kill time efficiently for the reader?"

"No, it's an efficient output of values."

When our readers' hearts are 100 percent full of desires, we talk about 100 percent spiritual pursuits, which is meaningless, and only by fitting 90 percent of desires, saying that 10 percent of the pursuits, can we effectively send people to better places. I'll give one ride, and let someone else deliver the next.

I'm dealing with readers who have the basic attributes of reality, and who have a lot of friends who are willing to talk about these things, who are inspired by them, and then they become less radical – and that's actually the path I've taken. Before this, I have been involved in a lot of discussions, such as the end of the fifth episode and many places, some readers, who have a certain literary culture, see this, and put forward that you have actually destroyed the aesthetic requirements of traditional literature, and even destroyed the integrity of the work, in fact, I have said it again and again a long time ago, this is the balance I chose.

Why can't I understand: in fact, I know very well in my heart that these pages are destructive to the integrity of the work?

Even if it destroys the integrity of the work, I want to highlight it. Another reason is that the brutal means of destroying the integrity of the work can highlight them more obviously.

I wrote a book that was very storytelling, and it could even be literary if I was a little higher, and I drew people in, and then gave them to me rudely, but it was also the result of hundreds of times of my thoughts. I used to say that if you don't like it, you can jump, but if you can't jump, you can bear it, and if you can't bear it, you will abandon the article, I actually said it more than once.

After every large-scale statement, someone came out to post an article, stating some basic concepts of literature, I can understand the meaning of the fist, but I don't like these things, in the final analysis, "Son-in-law" is an experimental essay from my point of view, it is to experiment with what literature cannot do, we try to kneel, can people step on it. And because it is an experimental text, it cannot be conclusive, I have repeatedly deduced countless times, the basic concept of literature, is the starting point of this deduction, what you think you want to teach me, I have already broken it up countless times and read it carefully, but you mention it, it will still waste my spirit and time.

It's as if after we have determined the basic attitude of doing things, and we have decided to start work with the most rigorous attitude, some people keep jumping out and saying, "How can you be sure that you are right?" "That's a waste of time.

I hope that after this article, no one will talk to me about the foundations of traditional literature. After it is written, we can judge its merits and demerits.

……

I advocate traditional literature because traditional literature expresses everything and its methods have been studied to the extreme, and I am afraid that the economic establishment of online literature is like the invasion of the Eight-Nation Alliance, and traditional literature will be defeated, and these good methods will be lost.

However, the literature of the future should not be high, it is not a sacred object hanging on the spire for people to worship, it should be a ladder for human society to step on and see the scenery at the spire.

The essence of human culture creation is to explore and improve the spiritual realm of the self. It doesn't matter if there is any culture that is not aimed at improving human society, whether it has it or not.

Brainstorming, writing too much - these were originally things to be written in the afterword. Well, I'm going to catch up on sleep. By the way, in the last half a day, a single chapter is a request for votes, whether it's good or not ^_^ (to be continued.) )