Regarding what has happened recently, about the so-called disconnection of the 55th Shift, I promised to do a review before, and it is all here. **************

——Remembering the "movement" that happened around us

2020 has been a magical year.

In the context of the trade war, from the spread of the new crown in China, to the spread abroad, and then to the current chaos in the United States, both the domestic and world situation seems to be changing drastically on a weekly basis.

In the face of such a thing, I once told my family that fortunately I chose the online literature industry, we buried ourselves in writing books at home, which is usually similar to isolation, the epidemic is coming, the situation outside has changed, and only we seem to have taken advantage. Who knows who the sky spares and on April 27, China Literature Group changed the dynasty, and a sudden outbreak of contract turmoil was overcome.

Throughout the month of May, this turmoil actually affected every writer of the article, and many readers were indignant and participated. In this whole process, there are things that I agree with, there are things that I don't agree with, I promised that I will do a review after the things have phased results, today on June 3rd, the new contract at the starting point came out, and this review can start to write.

Of course, I should note in advance that this whole article is still interpreted from my personal point of view. I'm just going to be honest about what I've been exposed to, what I'm thinking and what I'm thinking, and I'm going to give my readers a reference, and you can do it yourself.

**************

Speaking from the beginning, on April 27, the starting point was changed to a new dynasty, Cheng Wu took the position, and public opinion broke out about the possible implementation of free at the starting point. This matter is related to the rights and interests of all authors, and all kinds of worries have also swelled rapidly in the author group, followed by the news that the starting point has changed the contract to pave the way for free, and people are panicking.

At that time, we were most concerned about whether the free measures would be implemented rudely, so I kept asking in the group whether the matter of revising the contract was Cheng Wu's first action. I said in my Weibo post on May 2 that if it were his first move, we would basically not have to speak, and then we would have to vote with our feet.

However, after several days of inquiry, they all said that although Cheng Wu had been named in China Literature in the past, he actually didn't care about anything, and this time China Literature's personnel change was very sudden. Later, I also heard that Cheng Wu was still in quarantine in Beijing at the moment of accepting China Literature, and on May 6, he talked earnestly about why he was in Beijing, because he had not actually stepped into Shanghai China Literature after becoming the CEO - then, as to whether he would rudely implement the contract, it might be a bit of a turnaround.

In this process, the public opinion of the outside world swelled rapidly, and the central point changed from a free thing to a problem with the contract, the contract was very bad, and everyone would be angry when they saw it, of course, we didn't come into contact with the contract at the beginning, and the author was most concerned about the issue of free, and I was relieved after understanding that the rough implementation of free was not possible.

But the details of the contract are entangled with the wave of resentment for free, and the more troublesome it gets, we also begin to learn some details of the contract. We have a group, about 30 platinums in it, and on May 2nd we talked: "Is there really such a harsh condition in it?" I said, "If that's the condition, we'll have to say no." The rest of the people also agreed, and the demon night came out and said: "You write one, and I will use the Hunan Network Association to send it." "I said that I couldn't write official documents, I could only write about my attitude. At that time, the squid came out and reminded: "Let's not be busy writing first, let's find the real contract first, read it, and then talk." ”

Then the contract was found.

(There are many people who deliberately stir up contradictions, saying that the platinum god is different from the contract signed by ordinary people, but in fact, the two platinums in the group at that time have already signed a new contract, and they regret it like their grandson.) ）

We read the contract, picked out the most problematic points, and then I went to write the Weibo post on May 2nd.

On the one hand, I want to oppose this contract, on the other hand, the internal situation of China Literature was also very tense, after learning that the contract was not Cheng Wu's meaning, I hope that they can have a step, and I hope that China Literature can borrow the slope to get off the donkey, let Cheng Wu, the new boss, be the "Bao Qingtian", and change the contract, then everyone will be happy. Moreover, I think this form of statement can make the platinums and gods who are still reading the contract come out and express their position: we oppose the contract and want to make amendments.

Of course, in the middle, the squid was more frank, and at that time he directly pointed out the problems in the contract and scolded it. In addition to him, I am afraid that it is difficult for anyone to scold so frankly in the case of the contract.

At that time, we thought about it like this, and later some editors from the starting point came over and said that they had been anxious for several days and didn't know how to respond to public opinion. Then the toad contacted Cheng Wu and turned our Weibo over, he had actually put forward a lot of opinions on Cheng Wu's side secretly, many people didn't know about these things, and he later ridiculed himself as "South China Sea Holy Clam", which originated from this.

On the night of May 2nd, China Literature made a decision and went down this slope, on the one hand, it promised to negotiate and revise it earnestly, and on the other hand, it clarified that the contract was not our own pot, and we were somewhat relieved. But then, public opinion about the 55th Break Festival swelled rapidly, and the resistance to the earnest talks intensified.

On May 3rd, Hu Shuo approached me and invited me to a conference in Beijing, but I immediately refused, because my ability to express myself on the spot is actually very weak, and I can write tens of thousands of words after sorting out the logic, but if I want to express myself on the spot, I usually sweat profusely because my brain moves too much. On May 4th, after refusal, the public opinion of the scolding conference outside was no longer the same, saying that he was a thief and saying that he would nail people to the pillar of shame, and I went to find nonsense again, saying that I went to Shanghai like a squid, and if he expressed it positively, I would make up the number. Of course, the Shanghai earnest meeting has not yet been held, and there are some things in between, which we will talk about later in the article.

Our disagreement with many people is on the day of 55th, and many people don't understand why we are boycotting the so-called 55th Break Festival. In the middle of this, we first talk about some trivial considerations, many people think that this is a righteous and spontaneous "mass movement", but in fact, the speed of public opinion expansion is unusual, some senior editors in the circle said that the speed of public opinion expansion is the fastest I have seen since the Baidu Wei Zexi incident, and the trader is very powerful. And on May 2nd, 56 earnest talks were promised, and the public opinion and details of the next 55 break were quickly improved, and here I basically tend to believe that friends have already entered, even if they are not at the beginning, they should be in place in May.

Of course, whether there are friends or not, let's put it aside first, I said, this is a trivial consideration. Let's put these aside and talk about the nature of the 55 Break.

As we all know, the state has attached great importance to online literature in recent years, although the theoretical development has been relatively slow, resulting in the country not knowing how to use its power correctly, but in the literary circle, the attention to online literature has increased every year. This situation once puzzled traditional literature, they thought they were literature, why was the top of the board so generous in funding online literature, but not much in support of literature?

To put it bluntly, the support of the state is the influence of online articles, and if there is no influence, it will not reach the reader's literature, so why invest money. If we put aside literature and treat it as media and communication, the whole logic will be clear at a glance.

Online articles can basically be regarded as a kind of media, because we are reaching a huge readership at any time, of course, we do not output our views at will, we are a service industry, but we have the potential of the media, if one day we really want to express a position, it will really sink quickly into our readership.

In particular, the crude and simplistic stance of "boycotting the reading of literature".

55 On this day, there are many platinums, gods, and even authors who are not usually updated, and they run out to update, and some people scold the thieves, thinking that they are unproductive, so, think about it a little, if everyone really breaks off on this day, what will happen?

If on this day, all the authors directly come out to "boycott the reading of the article", what do you think the next May 6 will look like? Do you really think this is a demonstration?

No, starting from May 6th, the "boycott of reading literature" will become an unstoppable trend in the reader's circle. "In order to support the author, I don't read books at the starting point" "Author, you quickly change jobs, I will go wherever you jump".

Where is the real vitality of the starting point? It's about the huge number of genuine paying readers. The 55 Break Section is a move that attempts to sink the author's anger at the starting point directly into all readers. Some people say that it has a very positive meaning, it has a great effect, yes, its power and effect, far greater than everyone thinks, even at such a scale this time, the readership of the starting point, the activity, I am afraid has dropped by 20 percent, if all the head authors take the lead in making trouble, this is not a sit-in, this is a nuclear bomb.

That's what I've always said, there was a factory that was very domineering, and the workers got into a fight, and the factory decided to talk to the workers, and a group of righteous people rushed in and said, "The capitalists can't be trusted." "You have to be more resolute and destroy more things" The story of smashing the factory, among these people who smashed the factory, there will also be members of the security department next door.

On May 2, they had promised to talk, and the time for the talks was May 6, and the break was set at 55, just because they directly decided that "capital will not compromise", so they rushed in to let all the authors die, who are these people? There are very few people who eat at the starting point, and those who are indignant to this extent are either the authors of the outstation, or the street that can't eat at the starting point anyway, or the enthusiastic people who stand outside.

On May 4th, I said this truth in several groups of hundreds of authors.,55 I won't break the update.,I'll definitely update.,If you point to the next not at the starting point.,You will break it.,If the head author breaks this wave.,It's not a break section.,Just jump to the section.。

55 On this day, the administrators in the group originally wanted to respond, and I told them this in the alliance leader group with more administrators. I will definitely renew it, but I will not use this reason to openly resist the Breaking Change, because I also don't believe in the process of martial arts, although the Breaking Correction is set on the day of 55 is a good and a hundred harms, but since the harm can no longer be stopped, this is a benefit in the middle, I will not try to dissolve it.

On that day, even some of my readers couldn't understand my update, and some of them probably didn't read my book anymore, and if I had told them that at the time, many of them would have understood. But then I thought that people will encounter tigers in the world, and since they encounter such a turmoil, they will inevitably lose some of their things, and it would be better to treat them as war damage.

After 55, I only said some things on the side, although I am against 55, but I have not talked about and dismantled the problems in the middle of it head-on, the reason is that the pressure on Cheng Wu must be maintained, some people want to make trouble, or even make trouble, then let them make trouble, they keep making trouble, friends and businessmen have always had the possibility of incitement, keep this possibility, Cheng Wu will not take it lightly.

Having said that, if it was 515, it would have been a good thing, and I would have just come out and approved it with both hands.

But set at 55, that is the story of a group of sons of bitches who instigated a group of enthusiastic people. It smashed 20 percent of the factory buildings against the background that the factory had agreed to talks, and of course this group of people who smashed the factories would also say that the reason why Cheng Wu made today's concessions was all due to them. It's hard to say whose reason it is.

55 is the biggest doubt in the minds of many, who do not understand why the author updated on that day, for the onlookers, the impassioned and desperate struggle will make their blood boil, but what about the author at the starting point? What is the background?

There are thousands of authors who rely on it to eat, and they are not all big authors with a monthly income of tens of thousands and hundreds of thousands, some of them eat full attendance, and some rely on subscriptions to support their families. China Literature is very domineering today, and China Literature's past is also very domineering, but on the whole, China Literature is the one with the best score among all websites.

Although this is the best score, it may only be 60 points.

Emotions exploded, the author will hope to fight for 65 points on the basis of these 60 points, maybe there is still a mind in private, if you can't get it, it's okay to continue 60, it's better than other sites anyway, right? And the capitalists want to make the starting point of 60 points into 55 points, and they get more benefits. At this time, a group of enthusiastic people came, and at first they also wanted to win 65 points for the author, but then, their impassioned and desperate desire overpowered reason, they vigorously quoted the revolutionary manifestos of the past, and before the game began, they decided that "the capitalists will never compromise", they were decentralized, they did not set any stop loss points. There may also be the instigation of friends and businessmen, who quickly reduced the psychological expectation of the struggle to zero: if China Literature does not retreat, everyone will die together!

If we look at all this coldly, as if it were a mere mass movement, before 55 the interests of all the rebels were the same, but by 55 the radicals, who had been incited and mostly had no interests involved, began to expand the situation without any psychological burden, and this led to a split between the protesters on both sides.

The radicals shouted the slogans of the revolutionary period of the past to today, and took the judgment of the revolutionary period as the judgment of today. They affirmed that the capitalists were uncompromising, that they had to fight for the power to open windows with the force of lifting the roof, and they defined the exploiter as the "master" and the author as the "slave...... However, looking back, has it really reached this point today? If it does, what we need is a revolution.

One of the essences of the initial stage of socialism is that we will play a long-term game with capital and coexist for a long time.

These days, when we ask those who blindly memorize Lu Xun's quotations, "What kind of work do you do?" Do you think you're being exploited? None of them answered positively. Why? Our country is taking advantage of the benefits of capital, and we have suffered many of the harms of capital, and we hope to be able to contain some of its harms in the long-term game. Such a state of affairs is by no means the same as the methodology adopted during the revolutionary period.

What do you do?

Have you been exploited?

In fact, everyone is more or less suffering from it.

But today our country is a country of 70 years, and the development of capital has only been 30 years, and we have not yet reached the point where it is difficult to return and we cannot compromise on either side. We are suffering a certain amount of exploitation, we are also living our own lives, our days are even thriving, well, today a problem in your company is singled out, you will also participate in the resistance, at this time, I take revolutionary quotations to help you, tell you that your company will never compromise, burn a fire for you, what do you think? You don't dare to burn the fire, I say you are a slave, what do you think?

Even in times of revolution, people reduced their psychological expectations to zero only after several failed negotiations with capital or the government.

Those who resist for five days and ten days, directly reduce their psychological expectations to zero, and have no interests involved, and do not think it is a big deal to watch the excitement, are the so-called "lumpenproletarians" in history.

**************

On May 6th, the meeting in Beijing was held, and the process of the meeting was actually problematic, and the elbow and toad all scolded me.

In the following 5 months, there were two problems with the technology and operation of the starting point, because the situation was tense, everyone's nerves were very tense, so in the whole process, many authors found the editor to scold, I even said in front of the editor that 55 did not break the update, and this kind of thing can also be broken in June, and even I deliberately instigated the author's emotions, talking nonsense to talk to me, I said that this starting point is not good, the author will be mad, will collapse, this situation, or the more nervous the better, so as not to take Cheng Wu seriously.

In the middle, in fact, the biggest contribution is the old editors of China Literature, nonsense, 314, comfort, snowy night, dingdong...... It was they who were caught in the middle, on the one hand, they wanted to come out to calm down the situation when the author was scolding, and on the other hand, they wanted to pass the appeal to Cheng Wu.

The toad is also the person caught in the middle, of course he doesn't care about these, in early May, he called himself to ridicule himself as the "South China Sea Holy Clam", if he pointed to the left and right, he only needed to incite more in the direction of populism, and he could be liked by many people, but in fact, he hates fools, so when he sees those degraded guys later, he will scold.

Today 63, the new contract came out, and some of the very bad traps have been removed, of course, there will still be dissatisfaction, such as saying that I don't give you the copyright, what if you don't recommend me. In the middle of this, we need to look forward to a friend, if there is a good enough friend, can also give a better contract, of course, the starting point must also follow. At present, in the entire online literature circle, the vertical and horizontal contracts are good, but due to some operations in the early stage, their readership pool is not deep enough, which is its weakness. You see, I'm even willing to advertise here, there's competition, and it's good for all authors.

Although the contract at the starting point of today has converged, in the days to come, in the general trend, of course, they will slowly tighten again, and such a game will always exist. Not only in the online literature circle, but even in our lives, readers' careers will run throughout, if one day you want to rebel in the future, how to play?

As I have said again and again, on the one hand, there are readers, on the other hand, there are friends, on the other hand, there are authors, and on the other hand, there are enthusiastic people who have been instigated. This is a question that will continue throughout our lives.

One thing is certain.

No extreme attitude can be right from start to finish.

Beginning on April 27, by 55, the people who rose up to call and oppose were right, and there may be the impetus of friends behind this, without such a game, everything that followed would be impossible to talk about. But by 55, many people have become enthusiastic people who have been instigated by people with intentions, and then gradually develop, they have linked their initial position to face, and later, they have simply become fighting for face, and they will be indignant that so-and-so author is not on their side, and after the righteous indignation they want to smash everyone's interests, and these days on the Longkong Forum, this is the atmosphere. In fact, this is the inevitable evolution of all so-called "decentralized" movements, and in the end, only the most extreme people will remain at the center of such movements.

If you don't understand this, let's discuss it with a purpose, at first everyone said that they were trying to get back the interests of the author, but in just a month, the impassioned people no longer cared about the interests of the author at all, and their public opinion tendency became a big deal to die together, and even longed to read the article and die, the author died, this is because the things that came later were linked to their face.

Has the things they done changed? No, they are "resisting" in the same way from beginning to end.

That's the ass problem.

They want to be righteous all the time, but if you don't have the ability to distinguish between the stages of things, then the best result of all the resistance you do can only be "everyone dies together". Do you want such people to fight for your interests?

This is the whole process of the China Literature incident that I have seen. In the whole process, you will say that my position is vacillating, I don't trust the capitalists, I don't trust the blind masses either, sometimes I oppose the reading of the article, sometimes I cool down the matter of reading the article, I know that the position of the editor is basically the same as the position of the author, but I also instigate the instigators and put pressure on the editor in the author group...... If the reason for all this behavior is to be said, I hope that in this complex game, the possibility of the author gaining benefits will eventually be slightly greater. I'm not the key player in this case, but that's all I can do.

Thank you to all the friends who fought rationally for the interests of the author before and after 55, thank you to the old editors who were originally at the starting point, thank you to the toad, the elbow, the squid...... I also have to thank Cheng Wu, he finally gave in, so that everyone can have such a step.

***************

PS: Capital is not a good person. 56 In the earnest talks, although the toad elbow put forward many specific demands, in fact, some problems appeared, which led to the significance of this earnest talks going through the motions. Now that there is a good result, I will not talk about the specifics. Of course, there are some problems.

PS2: Throughout May, in order to cope with the impact of the Break, there were two problems with the technical and operational aspects of the starting point, and I felt a little sick and rushed to the doctor. This reminds me of a few times when I had dinner with Bao Jianfeng and Yi Zhi, even when they were traveling and socializing outside, they would hold their mobile phones and read the online texts of the starting point in the gap between things, even after having billions of net worth, they still did it. This is the biggest advantage of the first five in the online literature circle.

PS3: I hope you can really get some useful insights from it, I wrote a book, which has "the ruler of the literati, the knife of the warrior", the ruler has always made people tangled, and the knife makes people feel refreshed, but in our lives, only in the most extreme cases, we need to use the knife, and 99% of the category, we have to use the ruler, this ruler, and dialectical materialism is very related.

That's all for now.

(By the way, "make an advertisement, there are a few more pictures in there")