The power of the book was enormous, and after the publication of this article, England was shaken. Many people, under the repressive rule of Henry VII, have almost forgotten something.

For example, at the beginning of the essay, it is pointed out that Henry IV was acknowledging that his half-brother John was in the first place. When Beaufort's identity was legitimate, it was announced at the same time that John . Beaufort and his descendants were not eligible to inherit the throne.

(John. Beaufort was originally John of Gaunt and his mistress Catherine. Swinford's illegitimate son, but later John of Gaunt officially married Catherine. Swinford. Can John. Beaufort was not born after marriage, but was born out of wedlock. Therefore, Henry IV, the eldest son of John of Gaunt, after becoming king of England, made both the Holy See and the Parliament recognize John through connections. Beaufort's status as a legitimate child, but this is not actually reasonable. So, at the same time, Henry IV declared that John . Beaufort and his descendants are not included in the succession to the throne, and he himself has no opinion. After all, John. Beaufort was originally an illegitimate child. ）

That is to say, the Duke of Lancaster's vein, from John. Beaufort was not eligible to inherit the throne. Henry VII, on the other hand, seized the throne in the name of the head of the House of Lancaster. However, he never had the right to inherit the throne in this line. Therefore, if it is not managed to check whether the third emperor kills the king, Henry VII should not be eligible to inherit the throne.

But this point, after Henry VII ascended the throne, was deliberately ignored and forbade anyone to discuss this issue. Henry VII was not a good man, and Edward, a rival, was imprisoned by him for more than ten years, and he was almost killed. If Marin hadn't intervened after the crossing, Edward would have been a dead ghost long ago.

So, under the oppressive rule of Henry VII, no one questioned the legitimacy of Henry VII's throne for many years. Moreover, Henry VII was smart, he married Princess Elizabeth, the eldest daughter of Edward IV. In this way, even if he has no inheritance rights in that lineage, there is nothing left.

However, the basic condition of all this is that Richard III has indeed killed the king, and Edward of the House of York is controlled......

In fact, most people in England knew that Richard III had killed his own nephew. But the problem was that Richard III was so hidden that no one could find Edward V's bones. In this way, the problem is very troublesome. What do you say about the evidence of Richard III's murder? Trying criminals also requires evidence or confessions......

However, Henry VII did not find evidence of Richard III's murder, nor did he let Richard III personally admit that he killed the king, and Richard III was killed, how could he confess?

Therefore, Henry VII could not prove that Richard III was a regocide. In this way, he himself became a suspect in the murder of the king......

If there is no external intervention, even if others question it, it will be nothing. But now, with foreign intervention, the issue has become important......

The "Essay on Seeking Henry (Li)" not only pointed out that Henry VII himself was not qualified to inherit the throne, but also legally emphasized that Henry VII was the suspect of killing the monarch when he could not find evidence. There is no inheritance right in itself, and there is a suspicion of killing the king. And if you look for legal support from the York family, the former crown prince Edward is still ...... What do you think, Henry VII is not qualified to be king......

Therefore, as soon as the text came out, Henry VII was extremely passive. Moreover, he was completely unable to refute it. Because, what Edward said in the article is all ironclad facts that cannot be refuted. If you want to refute it, there is only one way, and that is to find the bones of Edward V and Richard, Duke of York, and prove the fact that Richard III killed the king...... But he couldn't find it......

Henry VII was extremely unstable and broke many precious objects in the royal palace. The most suffered, is the precious porcelain from the East, who let the porcelain not fall, or the future generations did not touch the porcelain......

Enraged, Henry VII, almost losing his mind, prepared to raise his army and go north first to deal with Edward, the little watch who had blocked him......

But eventually, his stepfather, Thomas, Earl of Derbyshire. Stanley stopped him:

"Your Majesty, don't be impulsive! Edward's move is obviously to provoke you! In the opinion of the old minister, Edward probably deliberately wanted to lure your army to the north so that the French could attack! ”

Several other important ministers chimed in, and in their opinion, Edward's 10,000-strong army looked like a lot, but it was no match for the British army. Only the French ** team is England's real henchman. As long as the French army is solved first, then Edward's 10,000 people will be completely food deliverers.

After being dissuaded by his ministers, Henry VII finally calmed down. Yes, Edward's inscriptions are indeed very demagogic. However, this world still relies on strength to speak. If Henry VII defeated the French invasion and eliminated his only rival, who would be able to oppose Henry VII?

So, the most important thing for Henry VII was to win the war and kill Edward, and Edward's daughter. Well, de jure, there is no one to compete with Henry VII for the throne. After all, Queen Elizabeth, the wife of Henry VII, was the eldest daughter of Edward IV. After the death of Edward, the last male of the House of York, and his descendants, there was no more orthodox heir than Queen Elizabeth's descendants......

Eventually, Henry VII put up with this and deliberately ignored Edward's "Essay on Henry". But at the same time, Henry VII sent cavalry to intercept and kill the men sent by Edward to post the inscriptions. At the same time, the posted documents should be confiscated everywhere to prevent the influence of the documents from expanding.

Henry VII had already decided that this time he must completely defeat the French fleet and kill as many French troops as possible, so that France could collapse. It is best to take the opportunity to recapture the fortress of Calais and maintain a deterrent against France.

In order to confuse the French and win this battle, Henry VII deliberately said in front of the papal investigation that he would march north with all his army and annihilate Edward.

There were French representatives in the Pontifical investigation team, and when they heard it, they naturally tried to find a way to send the information back home. In this way, the French are more at ease......

At the same time, Marin sent men to circumnavigate the North Sea and send a letter to the French on land, informing them that their army was ready, and thoroughly attracting the attention of Henry VII, asking the French to prepare to send troops across the sea......

King Louis XII of France hurriedly sent ships to reconnoiter the other side of the English Channel, and sure enough, he saw no large ships, only a few small fishing boats. In addition, there was news from London that Henry VII was so angry with Edward's "Essays on Henry that he was going crazy" and wanted to send all his troops to the north......

Eventually, the French got into the pit and began to gather large armies and ships to prepare to cross the English Channel and attack the English mainland......