The debating competition debriefing performance was held as scheduled in the school's lecture hall during self-study time on Wednesday evening. The chairman of the debate competition is Ms. Tian Hua, who first reiterated the rules of the debate competition. Each debate team is composed of four debaters, the positive and negative sides of the debate topic are determined by drawing lots on the spot, and the procedures of the debate competition are: 1. The opening argument of the positive side and the opening argument of the opposing side are three minutes; 2. The opposing side refutes the opponent's argument, and the positive side argues and refutes the opponent's argument, and the time is two minutes; 3. The three arguments of the positive side ask one question for each of the first, second and fourth arguments of the opposing side, and the opponent debaters answer separately, and the three arguments of the opposing side ask one question for each of the first, second and fourth arguments, and the debaters of the positive side answer each other, and the time for each question shall not exceed 15 seconds, and the cumulative answer time of the three questions shall be one minute and 30 seconds, followed by the summary of the three arguments of the positive side, and the summary of the three arguments of the opposing side, the time is one minute and 30 seconds; 4. Free debate, each time is three minutes, cumulatively calculated; 5. The time for the four arguments of the opposing side and the summary of the four arguments of the positive side is 3 minutes.

First of all, the third and fourth place finals were held, and the positive debate topic was "Rather for the head of the chicken, not for the tail of the phoenix", and the question of the opposition debate was "Rather for the tail of the phoenix, not for the head of the chicken". After the two sides drew lots to decide on the debate, they quickly entered the stage of hand-to-hand combat, and the firepower of the debaters on both sides was very fierce, almost to the point.

The main point of view is: although a good horse is good, it must be Bole to be able to get along, if there is no Bole, even if it is a thousand miles of horses, I am afraid that it will be a busy life. To be a phoenix, you need to be restrained everywhere, if the boss is not suspicious, it is okay, the question is how many bosses can do it now? You see a business opportunity, and when the layers are approved, the daylilies are cold, where is it better to be the king in a small territory, and you can say the same. If Han Xin is king, how can he be destroyed at the hands of women? The reality is like this, even if a person is talented, without Bole knowledge, it is useless to be a hero. The opposite is true. Therefore, people who dare to be the head of the chicken can have a certain amount of courage, because in this way they will be bold to exert their own abilities as soon as possible, on the contrary, those who are willing to be phoenix tails must not move forward, and there is no certain dare to do it.

The opposing side believes: 1. Will being a chicken head necessarily get better resources and development prospects? Not necessarily. In contrast, the management model of weak and small enterprises is often backward, the foundation is often weak, and the flow of talents is often not scientific enough. In addition, compared with the head of the chicken, it is easier to learn the advantages of others in the team to be a phoenix tail, and this is exactly what people who are satisfied with being a "chicken head" in a small and weak team can not get. 2. The self-confidence that needs to be maintained by comparing with others around you is a false self-confidence. If you choose a weak team for this reason, it is meaningless except to prove that he is weak; 3. If you look at the ratio of tail to head in any team, it is easy to see that most people are ordinary members of the group. You also make the head of the chicken, and I also make the head of the chicken, are you a nine-headed bird when you are a chicken?

The two sides of the debate insist on their own words, and they do not compromise with each other, and the audience below is listening to the positive side is reasonable, and the opposing side is also reasonable, and there is no consensus. Finally, Vice President Liang took the stage on behalf of the judging team to comment and announce the results of the competition. Principal Liang commented on the debate between the debaters on both sides, and he concluded by saying that the judges also had a heated discussion on who won and who lost, and believed that both sides were excellent and in the middle of the two, and finally voted 3:2 to decide that the opposite side would win. The audience erupted in warm applause, which lasted for a long time.

"Teachers and students, the most wonderful and sacred moment has arrived! The next is the championship and runner-up finals of the first secondary school debate competition of Liangzhou Second Division! First of all, we applauded and invited the debaters from both sides to take the stage, and then I would like to introduce you to the eight students who participated in the competition. Teacher Tian Hua appeared again and applauded.

The theme of this debate is "to make safflower or green leaves". Zhao Hongyi's group picked the opposite: to be a green leaf. He is responsible for the fourth debate, and is mainly responsible for accepting the opponent's three arguments and making the final closing argument.

"Moderator, judges, students, good evening! For a long time, it has been believed that a red flower must be set off by green leaves to look more delicate and beautiful. This misleads some people into thinking that green leaves are the highest pursuit of human beings. Is this the right idea? If everyone only thinks about making green leaves, not safflowers, then who will promote the development of society? This leads us to the positive point of view, people should make safflower, why is that?

From a subjective point of view, people always have the desire to be dissatisfied with the status quo and be dissatisfied, which is what stimulates people's self-motivation. In today's highly competitive society, who doesn't want to get a good job, who doesn't want to drive a good car and live in a bungalow, who doesn't want to have a high income and live a comfortable life? And who doesn't yearn for the benefits of this kind of saffron? Isn't it true that tens of millions of students study hard to become famous in one fell swoop? In fact, this kind of red flower psychology has long been established in people's hearts.

From an objective point of view, everyone wants to do safflower, they have to continue to climb, constantly cultivate their own ability, have excellent skills, enhance self-worth, because the production relations have a promoting effect on productivity, so that the competition in the market has become fierce invisibly, naturally, it has also promoted the development of the times, the progress of society. Otherwise, why did Chairman Mao lead the people's revolution and Comrade Deng Xiaoping's reform and opening up to bring about China's rapid development? Therefore man should make saffron. ”

The positive side argues that the king is talented, and he talks eloquently, just like his name, he is indeed talented.

"Host, judges, hello everyone! We all know that "safflower" and green leaves complement each other, complement each other, and are interdependent. People often use "green leaves silently dedicate people, with safflower metaphor for people who are in the limelight, people take safflower as precious, no green leaves that are no safflower, safflower must also be lined with green leaves?"

Green leaves are the main body of society, they have been silently dedicated and hard working all their lives, they are the soil of society, cultivating talents who are as eye-catching as safflower. If there are no green leaves, without their silent dedication, there will be no brilliance of safflowers, as for the absence of any so-called safflower, just like the striker on the football field, it is certainly the safflower that attracts everyone's attention. But without the continuous support of their teammates, they would also be unable to avoid the embarrassment of "it is difficult for a good woman to cook without rice".

Green leaves, indicating no regrets to dedicate everything, do not ask for any return, there is a noble character of "bowing down and willing to be a son of a cow"! We modern young people should not only develop modern culture, but also continue to carry forward our country's fine traditional culture and thoughts, and the green leaf character is one of the most distinctive traditional ideas and cultures of the Chinese nation. As a green leaf, what he pursues is a kind of collective strength, the spirit of doing great things, he pays attention to the collective interests, the spirit of serving the collective, which is a very lofty ideological realm, and should also be pursued by us. Our opponent thinks: man should be a green leaf! Thank you! ”

The opposing side argued Zhao Mei with a sharp speech, and the whole speech was like pouring beans into a bamboo tube, in one go.

The next two sides of the two arguments to refute each other's arguments, the two sides of the three arguments to ask questions and debate summary, free debate session, all wonderful, climax, the judges on the rostrum teachers kept nodding frequently, the palms of the students in the audience were hurting.

"This concludes the free debate time, and thank you for your excellent presentations. Finally, there is the closing argument stage. First of all, please ask the opposing side to state its point of view. Please. "The chairman, Mr. Tian Hua, couldn't bear to interrupt the wonderful free debate.

"Hello everyone. First of all, I have to ask the positive side a clear question, that is, a basic knowledge of physics. The squarers have been emphasizing what they think is the right argument – that people should be safflowers. However, from the point of view of physics, the action of force is reciprocal, and the rest of an object is relative. Today's thesis is the same, safflower can only be called safflower relative to green leaves, but if safflower is compared with safflower, especially if the thesis of the square hand is true, then this society is that everyone is a safflower. In contrast, the safflower at that time was at best green leaves, and Zhengfang had been deceived by the appearance of things, without fully recognizing its essence. So what exactly should people do? Let me summarize my views.

Ferdila once said, "Only ordinary life is real life." "That's true, and we've just argued it. The whole life is thought and labor. Although labor is obscure and ordinary, it cannot be stopped. There have been many celebrities who have become famous and want to be ordinary people again. Tao Yuanming's "Ask you how you can be, and your heart is far away"; Lees's deathbed repentance; Li Yu'an in "Who is the cutest person" does not want fame, and has been a worker silently for a lifetime.

China has a 5,000-year-old cultural tradition, and Gou Jian once said: do not suffer from the shortcomings of the crowd, but suffer from the lack of shame in their aspirations. China also has an excellent modern culture. Take our People's Liberation Army as an example, what they admire is the spirit of wholeness, and it is precisely this spirit that makes China's military prestige famous in the world. Isn't that the power of green leaves? Shouldn't people be green leaves? Shouldn't people have green leaves as their highest goal? Greatness has and can only be built by the ordinary. It's just a saffron person, and sooner or later you'll understand. Thank you. ”

Zhao Hongyi, the fourth argument of the opposing side, has a strong logical thinking ability, and his witty remarks are full of witty words, and the audience below is very enjoyable to listen to.

After thanking the opponent's defense friend for his statement, let us carefully analyze that the opponent's defense friend not only cannot justify his beauty, but also has several fly in the ointment, the greatness expounded by the other party, they do not use words to make people realize or do not use actions to shock people, so how do people know his greatness? Isn't it a red flower to be a great man? Without the saffron of great men, how can we promote the interest of the nation? Here's what we have to say:

If everyone should be green leaves and not make safflowers, then who will promote the progress of society in the future? Everyone should be safflower, it does not mean that everyone can become safflower, the reality of society is survival of the fittest, in the pursuit of safflower in the process of someone must be forced to make green leaves. Now some people in society are willing to be green leaves, but it does not mean that everyone should pursue to be green leaves, if so, how can we realize the dream of flying in China? Li Yang once said: Life is struggle. Isn't the psychology of constantly climbing to higher and steeper peaks to show your strength and striving to climb upwards a manifestation of striving to become a safflower? Thank you. ”

The summary arguments of the four arguments obviously felt a little flustered, not enough firepower, and a little difficult to justify, and some students below booed.

Let me say a few words. First of all, it is commendable that you have the courage to participate in today's debate competition. From a Chinese point of view, the tone of the students' expressions is not fluent enough, and there are often some tail notes. The views are not clear enough, and some students do not focus on their own opinions; To seize the other party's loopholes; There is no need to rush to answer a question; Some did not go deep into the other party's deviation and continued to argue. For today's topic, if I had to choose, I would choose green leaves, and if it accidentally became a red flower, it would be fine. That's all I have to say. Thank you. ”

Vice President Liang of the school once again took the stage to make a routine comment.

"Well, the results are in. I'm looking forward to it. 79.5 points for the plus side and 84.8 points for the tail. The winning side is the opposing side, and the best discerning player is the opposing side of the fourth discernment Zhao Hongyi! ”

Teacher Tian Hua announced the final results of the competition, and Zhao Hongyi's group won the title of the champion of the first secondary school debate competition of Liangzhou Second Division! The group of relatives and friends below, the students of Class 5, rushed to the stage, lifted Zhao Hongyi, threw him into the air, caught it, and lifted it up again......