Today, I saw a friend in the book review section who said that I used a whole chapter to analyze a treaty, that is, it did not promote the plot, and it did not help the story. It's very boring, and the protagonist does all kinds of things and shrinks back, which is very unatmospheric.

I agree with myself, and it is true that I have drawn too much ink on this kind of analysis. And the protagonist is indeed quite cautious in many things

But I can't help but write, as I said in the introduction, that this is the process of a newly industrialized country challenging the sea power of the old hegemon, and historically, the Germans have failed.

So, looking at the struggle process of a loser as a latecomer, it is obvious that the first thing is to find out what went wrong to lead to failure? Therefore, a cautious mindset is inevitable. If we are going to follow the path of a successful person, then obviously we can let go a lot, because the result is destined to succeed, so the reforms made will make this success more brilliant, but it is not possible to follow the path of a loser, and he has to consider whether some of the things he has made will be more unsuccessful

Therefore, I can't write a peerless monarch who is heroic and directs the country, but can only be the struggle of a loser, no matter how much the protagonist improves his skills and strives for more benefits, he is just struggling for an ending that is bound to fail.

Then there is analysis, I have read a lot of novels about World War I Germany, and many of them are very well written, and I can't match the military, economics, character portrayal, and emotional description in them.

However, many of them have a problem that has not been dug deeply, that is, Germany was actually worried about internal and external troubles at that time, the internal Junker aristocracy was making trouble, and the external diplomacy was in a mess, and many of them were Germany with a stronger army, more advanced technology, better tactics, and stronger national strength, and then it could win the first war. But it's not that simple. I know that my pen is not strong enough, so I can't use this kind of internal and external troubles to come out with the plot table, so I can only write and analyze. I apologize for that, I'm really embarrassed.

However, this analysis is not useless, because it can show the complex international environment and political atmosphere at that time. At the same time, it is also the basis for the protagonist to make national policy adjustments in the future. Of course, people don't like it, and I can only say I'm sorry

Finally, there is technology and economy, I will not open a golden finger for technological development, and the technology that appeared in a qiē is based on the technology that can be achieved by the industrial capacity at that time, so it is impossible for an all-metal monoplane to appear in World War I, and an aircraft carrier as the main force in naval warfare, because the technology cannot be reached.

And economics is not what I'm good at, so the description must be stiff. All I can say is that it is as much as possible in line with the economic development of the time. Everyone's forgiveness

In the end, I know that the novel I wrote is probably not "cool" for many of my friends. It's more of an expository essay than a novel.

However, this is a little feeling of studying the history of the First World War, so even if it is immature, I will write it down