Thanks to the book friends for the book reviews compiled by Shuifang 03, so that more people can understand the growth process of the Three Kingdoms of Commerce. I would also like to thank you for your affirmation and criticism of this book.

□ [Essence] The strength of a nation lies in its long-standing culture and spirit. During the Three Kingdoms period, Confucianism was not deeply rooted. The use of modern knowledge theories can cure the symptoms, and it is fundamental to establish a national spirit that will never give up. After all, the protagonist can only rule for a hundred years. A hundred years can dominate the world, but it cannot fundamentally make the nation invincible. Modern America is powerful, but it does not have a time-honored national spirit. I don't know much about the United States, and I arbitrarily believe that the national spirit of the Americans is the supremacy of interests. It can be said that it coincides with the author's foothold on "business", and I recommend three votes to encourage it. I'm lazy and don't like to make too many remarks. Just a reminder that since the historical subject matter is written, there are not too many fantasy plots. bigotry

□ Very good, train an elite army, establish a complete grassroots leadership and logistics system, then conquer the world, let the king gallop!! Looking back

□ [Essence] The author is seriously exploring the plan of national prosperity and long-term stability, which is very thought-provoking. Smash 2 votes, come on/ Alexander

□ [Essence] is too bloody, after all, everyone belongs to the Chinese nation. 5. The invasion of the Chinese nation cannot be blamed, but the incompetence of the rulers of our Han nation. Wishing Scott

□ In the first chapter: "It has always been believed that Babylon, Egypt, India, and China, known as the four great ancient civilizations of the world, have their own national epics. However, the Han nation, which has a long history of 5,000 years and splendid cultural traditions, has not discovered the grand epic of its own nation for thousands of years, and this is undoubtedly the most regrettable and confusing thing for the Chinese. "I don't think it's a matter of regret and confusion, what's the use of the epic that the four ancient civilizations all but China finally died out of a single nation? Only China, for 5,000 years, the continuous integration of ethnic groups and cultures, and the ability to inherit and form China's own unique civilization, is it not worthy of our pride? Zihua

□ China was basically unified in the first two millennia, and in the last two millennia (after the Qin Empire), the period of unification was 1215, and the period of division and civil strife was 785 years (plus the middle and late civil strife of the unification period, about 800 years). A basic law is that all strong and weak China is in the period of reunification, and all poor and weak China is in the period of division and civil strife. There is no other great nation in the world that has gone through so many divisions and civil strife like China, and has been able to integrate itself every time and finally return to the trend of reunification! Zihua

□ As for "to the present, employees are not loyal to the company at all, always thinking: they can replace them." "It seems that it has nothing to do with the change of dynasty in China, the relationship between enterprises and employees is the employment and employment relationship under the market, it is a two-way choice, and when it comes to loyalty, it seems to be too much, and it has not reached such a high level." As a result, colleagues are full of fraud, and friends only want to take advantage of each other. "It's also a partiality that covers the whole thing, and the world is not all like this. Zihua

□ [Essence] National competition is all-round competition and comprehensive quality competition. It is not just war and violence that will determine the fate of a nation. One of the most important points is the conflict and competition of the forms of civilization itself. Is the lifestyle inclusive? Is the language concise and aesthetically pleasing? Is it conducive to communication? Are beliefs pluralistic? And coexist with other peoples' forms of belief? Do the humanistic spirit, values, ethics, forms of the state, social structure, leisure styles, aesthetic methods, modes of residence, norms of interpersonal relations, traditions of marriage and gender relations, affinity between family and clan forms, etc., have a solid foundation? Does it have a strong spiritual appeal? Zihua

□ To sum up, does the mode of civilization formed by the synthesis of all these aspects have a profound attraction and strong cohesion for the individual of the nation? Is it inclusive and affinity for different ethnic groups? The clash of civilizations is a "soft" form of national competition. It determines the rise and fall of a nation for a longer time. A nation whose form of civilization is not flexible (inclusiveness and affinity) is bound to be a nation whose dignity is extreme, that is, a tiger's ass civilization. Such a civilized nation will inevitably fall into a continuous conflict between external conflicts and internal ethnic civilizations, and no one can accommodate anyone, which will eventually lead to the decline of the entire nation. Zihua

□ [Essence] The vast Roman Empire was a rigid society forged by war horses and swords and shields. He lacked a rich and profound native civilization, and refused to absorb the ancient Greek civilization and transform itself. Although strong, it does not have the foundation of a flexible civilization. What did the Roman Empire leave to mankind but the Colosseum, the bloody gladiatorial arena of slaves, the countless conquests, the lavish public facilities, the extravagant bathing and drunken habits, and a Roman Code and philosophical sophists? Zihua

□ It is indeed a pity that the main civilization of a world empire that has existed for about a thousand years should be so barren. However, in the erosion of historical years, the Roman nation finally disintegrated silently. But many of the nations he conquered did not perish. Quality is better than text, which is the fatal flaw of ancient Roman civilization and the inevitable tragedy of ancient Roman nation. Zihua

□ You said: "China's unified political geography lacks the innate conditions for interaction and competition to promote development. This self-enclosed unification led not only to stagnation, but also to Yoro's arrogance and ignorance of the world. But this is not the case, except for the Ming Yongle (after Zheng He's voyage to the West) and the middle of the Qing Dynasty (the Qing Dynasty is a special case, which will be mentioned later), China has always been open and has always maintained exchanges with the West, not the self-enclosed unification you say, and the "stagnation" you say is limited to the Manchu period. Zihua

□ China has never been stingy in closing itself off when it was strong and unified, from the jade road of the Warring States, Qin, Han and Tang dynasties, the ancient Silk Road (land route), the water silk, porcelain, and tea routes of the Song and Ming dynasties, and the exchanges with the West through the South Seas, India, and Persia have also continued, and even during the period of division, it has maintained small-scale exchanges with the West. And it is precisely these uninterrupted exchanges that have provided sufficient scientific and technological and cultural nourishment for the development of modern civilization in the West. Zihua

□ You say, "Throughout history, of the four great civilizations, Babylon perished in the Great Unification, and Egypt and India were conquered in the Great Unification." As for the history of China, it is nothing more than a history of constant subjugation. After the Han Dynasty, there were five Hu chaotic Hua, and the five Hu were driven away. We ushered in the Tang Dynasty, which was quickly plagued by the Anshi Rebellion of the alien race, and was divided by the northern and southern dynasties of the alien race, and the confrontation between the north and the south in the Song Dynasty was not to mention, and the end was conquered by the Mongols. The Ming Dynasty drove out the Mongols, and we were conquered by the Qing Manchus. Do you think this kind of unification is worth showing off? "I still emphasize that please don't change the concept, I emphasize the significance of Chinese culture and classical philosophy to the survival of the Chinese nation, not how about great unification. Zihua

□ The fall of Babylon was caused by the inability of its own culture to bear the burden of the state, and I do not know what happened to Egypt and India, except that they were not able to resist foreign invasions. For most of China's history, it was a situation of "strong rebound and limited expansion", and it was the first great wisdom of the Chinese nation in the long-term competition for survival - the super wisdom to deal with foreign enemies. Please also note that after the Han Dynasty, the period between the Western Jin Dynasty and the Sui Dynasty did not drive out the "Wuhu", but the Wuhu was homogenized and became part of the Chinese nation. Zihua

□ I would like to mention the Yuan and Qing dynasties. The Mongols swept across Europe and Asia, unified China, and established their vast steppe empire. However, the ancient Mongols, who relied on state entities, were destroyed for hundreds of years and are still fragmented. Why did the Mongols fail? Because its own native civilization is not mellow enough and inflexible, it cannot assimilate the civilization of the conquered land like ancient Rome, but is trapped in conflict with the local civilization, and then fails in the internal division caused by the fragmentation of civilization. The Manchu Qing could not be viewed outside the Chinese nation because it was sinicized, although not completely. Although the Manchus are not the main ethnic group in China, they are undoubtedly Chinese. Zihua

□ The seizure of national power by the Manchus was essentially a matter of the unified form of the Chinese. It was only because the Han nationality, the main body of China, had become a B or even C corner for the first time, coupled with the revenge psychology of the Manchus in the early days of entering the customs, and the high-pressure policy imposed on the Han people, that the Han people had a sense of losing the country. However, with the Manchu identification with Chinese civilization and the increasing number of Han people entering the central power, the Chinese civilization with the Han civilization as the main body finally recognized the central ruling power of this minority that successfully broke away from the backward parent body. Therefore, the Manchu rule is fundamentally different from the invasion of foreign enemies in Chinese history. China's weakness began in the Manchu Qing Dynasty and was determined by the national character of the Manchus, a weak nation ruling a large nation with a deep culture, Zihua

□ Her national psychology is inevitably panicked, and she must use several means to achieve her rule, one is to wipe out the cultural elite of this nation, change her national character - enslavement, stifle her cultural development, implement the Eight Shares, Xing*, and delete the Siku Quanshu, so as to meet the needs of the Manchu ruling culture, precisely because the Manchu Qing Dynasty's stiflation of the development of Chinese culture made the whole nation complacent, and was not prepared for foreign invasion. Zihua

□ You say, "I'm talking about your conclusion about the decline of Roman civilization in the book review." Roman civilization has not declined, and Western civilization is all branded with Roman civilization. Darwin believed that only competition can lead to development, and the Mongols believed that only fast wolves have food in the steppe, and it is precisely because of the competition of the countries of the European continent that the rise of the West has occurred. And our great unity, this state of super-stability, is not in line with the theory of evolution, and it is also inconsistent with social development. "I think the decline of ancient Roman civilization is an indisputable fact, and you say" that "Western civilization is all branded with Roman civilization." "So where are these imprints embodied? The soil of the Renaissance in the West was mostly born from ancient Greek philosophy, the civilization that China transmitted to the West and the indigenous culture of Western Europe. Zihua

□ Ancient Rome, on the other hand, gave Europe only an expectation of expansion. Darwin's knowledge, I agree. But you say, "And our great unity, this state of super-stability, is neither in line with the theory of evolution, nor with the development of society." "I don't agree with it, this is your misinterpretation of Chinese civilization and a blunt one. The nation is the crystallization of the competition for human survival and the result of the great waves and sands. Any nation that can stand on its own feet in the world has experienced all kinds of harsh tests of survival. Those who know Chinese history know that in the era of cold weapons, China experienced more and more tragic shocks than any other nation! And practice has proved that no military force (including the West, of course) is enough to destroy the Chinese nation. Zihua

□ The foundation of a nation's survival lies in resisting bullying and aggression by foreign ethnic groups. In other words, the strength of the war capability determines the fate of this nation. The ability to fight is low, and sooner or later it will perish. This is an iron rule in the history of national development. The fundamental point of the Chinese nation's long-lasting durability lies in its unparalleled ability to resist and dissipate external dangers. In the vicissitudes of thousands of years, this ability has been perfected and reached a very high artistic realm. The core of this art of resistance can be summed up in eight words – strong rebound, limited expansion. In the face of a strong enemy, resolutely counterattack, this so-called strong rebound. The counterattack is victorious, and it is enough to stop, this so-called limited expansion. Zihua

□ On the whole, after each victory over the Great Crisis, the Chinese nation did not have the explosive expansion of the Western Empire or the Eastern Genghis Khan, but always limited its victory to a certain range. The grasp of this "degree" fully reflects the profound strategic insight of the Chinese nation. In a sense, it is not difficult to fight back, but it is extremely difficult to brake at the right time after a big victory. Zihua

□ From the article, I found that you mentioned the ancient Roman Empire many times, and it can be seen that you like the Western system very much. But the Western system is not omnipotent, more than 2,000 years ago, the Apennine mountain people annexed Greece and swept across Europe with an absolute martial spirit to establish the Roman Empire, but where are those Romans now? Where are the ancient Egyptian pharaohs, who created the pyramids and many great civilizations, today? India, one of the so-called four ancient civilizations, has made the greatest contribution to mankind is Buddhist culture, but its history of hundreds of years is a black hole of interruption. The iron-blooded empires of the Middle Ages, Byzantium, Ottoman, and Holy Rome were also wiped out, and their main nations were scattered and disappeared in the human ocean. Zihua

□ There are also those powerful kingdoms that are absolutely martial, Macedonia, Persia, Bohemia, and the Great Moon clan have all become ruins for people to pay homage to, and the main peoples of that time have also been scattered and integrated, and those unique civilizations have also become meteors floating in the human sky. An excellent nation must respect its own history and face its own history squarely. Because it was a long and rigorous test, and it was a fact that it was able to prove itself to be excellent. In that unshakable fact, there is the powerful power of a nation's original civilization, and there is the great wisdom of survival, the great skill of resistance, and the full and exciting state of life that have been tried and tested effectively. Zihua

□ Reflection on history at a critical juncture can often inspire a nation's wisdom and courage to create a survival strategy suitable for the present era from the tried-and-true survival skills. Let's look at modern times and think about the catastrophe of mankind, how did World War II happen? Did it come from Western civilization? The demise of Hitler's Third Reich, the collapse of the former Soviet Union, and the nuclear Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union almost led to the destruction of world civilization all arose from the ******** of the West. Western ******** did not fit into the ancient Chinese civilization. Why is Europe trying in every possible way to seek reunification but has repeatedly failed to succeed? Zihua

□ Finally, I would be happy to discuss with you the differences between Chinese and Western civilizations, and even the influence of Chinese and Western civilizations on the development of your own culture. I always feel that you seem to have a negative mentality of Chinese civilization because of the weakness of modern China, of course, I have also seen it in many other historical novels, and there are quite a few of them, but I don't agree with this mentality, why can't we face up to our own civilization? Could it be that the world must only be the ******** of the West? There is no room for our civilization to survive? No, by no means, history will tell us all this. (I'm done, just watching the opening ceremony of the European Cup) Zihua

□ I really admire Brother Zihua!! Here I think that after thousands of years of survival and development of the Chinese nation with the Han nationality as the main body, and constantly integrate with other ethnic minorities, the development has formed a national soul, it is really this national soul when China is in trouble, and strive to make the Chinese nation stand tall among the nations of the world, if a nation loses or loses this, then even if he is strong for a while, the hegemonic side will eventually become a wave in the long river of history like the Mongol Empire, the Ottoman Empire, and the Persian Empire, although it is brilliant but also short-lived. xwx00831

□ Therefore, a nation should have its own ways and means to survive and expand. And you can't blindly copy the experience of other countries. History has proved that our country cannot follow the Western path, nor can it follow the model of the former Soviet Union. Although little Japan imitated the Western model, making him strong in one fell swoop. But he also retained a strong samurai spirit. xwx00831

□ I am the only one who writes so few good books. However, I am determined that China is not suitable for Western democracy. Because the Chinese are too heavily corrupted by Confucian ideology and have servility in their bones, only a system with a high degree of centralized power is suitable for China. Chinese like infighting, the democratic system will inform China of civil strife, only a high degree of central power accumulation system can allow China to have a unified and relatively peaceful wow1

□ Ancient Greek civilization, which roughly synchronized with the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period in China, was a mild and fragile island civilization. Although this civilization contains profound philosophy, rational jurisprudence, romantic mythology and some famous scientific principles, it has become an immortal civilization heritage of mankind. However, the ancient Greek civilization lacked an inherent strength and great life tension. They were concerned with the profound meaning of life, so a profound philosophy was born. They were concerned with the civilization of the order of their existence, so the law was born. They indulge in romantic fantasies, so they weave brilliant myths. However, a nation with such a civilization did not give birth to a work on military science—the crystallization of a great spirit of resistance! Zihua

□ This only shows that the consciousness of guarding against the outside world has not become an integral part of the civilization of this nation at all. As a result, the ancient Greek nation did not escape the doom of extinction, and was ruthlessly wiped out by the infantry of the Roman nation with a backward civilization. Literature is better than quality, which is the fatal flaw of ancient Greek civilization and the inevitability of the tragedy of ancient Greek nations. It can be seen that it is not possible to dissipate foreign invasion without a dissipating force. Not every nation responds to the clash of civilizations in the same way. As far as Europe as a whole is concerned, it can be said that there is no big difference in the form of civilization, and in a sense, it can even be said that Europe is a big form of civilization. The difference in the form of civilization is by no means greater than the difference between the people of Northwest China and the Lingnan people. Zihua

□ Western scholars were often proficient in more than a dozen languages, and Engels could "stutter more than twenty languages," that is, ordinary literate people could also understand about three or five languages. This is the basic sign of civilization - the similarity of language and writing. In China, in addition to the unity of writing, the language is really very different, and there are many people in the mountainous areas of Jiangnan and Lingnan with different languages. Food, housing, marriage, customs, etc., have also been said to be "ten miles of different customs" since ancient times. However, China is a large country with a stable common civilization. Europe, on the other hand, has always been a region of peoples composed of many, many countries with similar civilizations. This is the result of the ability of national civilization to resolve conflicts. Zihua

□Therefore, it is not possible to be complacent and not absorb the culture of other peoples, and a nation that cannot learn has no future; At the same time, the ability to resist foreign civilizations will not work either, and they will also die out and be replaced by other civilizations. The key to maintaining the development of one's own civilization and absorbing the essence of other advanced civilizations without dying out is to grasp a degree, as mentioned earlier, on "strong rebound, limited expansion", which is the essence of the golden mean in China's original culture. Zihua

□ Many of the views on the clash of civilizations between China and the West come from Brother Sun Haohui, and I agree with him. You may say that I am quibbling, but I like to make such comparisons, China's problem is that there is a good system, but it is not well realized, if the people's congress can be made worthy of the name, and the country is bigger than the party (the direction of political system reform in the future), China's system will be superior to the West. China needs centralization, but there is democracy in centralization, just as there is centralization in Western democracy now. The difference is that China is going its own way. (If there is a foul, Madara bamboo will be cut) Zihua

□ I agree with most of the views of the Galactic Heroes, that China's classical philosophy flourished during the Eastern Zhou Dynasty, with the prosperity of war, law, Confucianism, Mo, Taoism, and so on, and that these classical philosophies can be collectively referred to as Sinology, and that it is Sinology that influenced the course of Chinese history, not just Confucianism. These classical philosophies have influenced each other and complemented each other over a long period of 2,500 years. The Chinese are pragmatic, not imaginative, like the Indians, so when a classical philosophy is in line with the national interests of the time, it will be admired, because the period of unity and stability is more than the period of division, and Confucianism is conducive to the stability and unity of the country is revered for a little longer, but China has not reached the point of exalting all Confucianism. Zihua

□ Brother Zihua, you are a patriot, but don't use papers for comments, okay? Do you admire the article "Five Thousand Years of National Spirit" (URL: The Game Man's Home, the work published in 2003 by the Three Kingdoms Virtual Community Cultural Pavilion)? I think most of your theories come from this article, because the people in our dormitory have had a big discussion about this article, and they think that it is impossible to judge from this article whether it is praising or belittling our national spirit. Moreover, we believe that the Han people's often self-proclaimed history of assimilating conquerors is a testament to the corrosive nature of this national culture, and even the strong peoples of the steppe have become weak and unable to fight. If we are to truly rise again, we have to revisit this culture. Of course, labor pains are inevitable. On the water side 03

The □ people, since ancient times, how many disasters have they gone through, and how many nations have been wiped out in that silent killing, what supports us to come down? It is the morality of the rise and fall of the world, the responsibility of the husband, not the allegiance to the emperor. The country can be broken, the family can die, and the clan cannot be destroyed. The country can be rebuilt, the home can be rebuilt, but if the clan is wiped out, it will never be able to turn over, in such a situation, can you say to learn from Japan? Just for the defeat of World War II, the bushido who committed suicide by seppuku? Martial maniac

□ And who will pass on this idea? There is no eternal country, just like there is no immortal emperor? Only when culture is integrated into the blood of the nation can it be passed on forever, Confucian etiquette, Legalism's imperial art, soldiers' strategic planning, Taoism's way of life I don't know if the author has seen it, regardless of the disappeared ink, name, yin and yang families. A purely technological power will only develop an empire as huge as a dinosaur, and it will only be greeted by the result of destruction without natural enemies! Mankind cannot be without enemies, and also needs enemies, that is that Japan's Tanaka took the huge China as the object of challenge, so that Japan has today's prosperity, I hope the author can be more rigorous, this is not a fairy tale, it is not just a person! Martial maniac

□ agree with the madman! There is no immortal emperor, and the mind lives on! A nation becomes a nation because of its culture and ideas. Think back to the past! In the long river of history, how many excellent cultures have been annihilated! Science and technology are only the art of strengthening the country, and the inheritance of ideas and culture is the foundation of the country! dracon

□ [Essence] Western civilization attaches great importance to intelligence, so it has achieved democracy and scientific and technological development. Chinese civilization attaches great importance to affection, so it is a country of etiquette and righteousness, but it also causes nepotism to be complicated. Without a material foundation, there is a strong culture and ideology, and there is a strong national strength and national inheritance, and ideology and spirit are just material development to a certain extent, which arises naturally. Let's see how the author arranges the plot after that. On the water side 03

□ [Essence] is indeed a good book, written with great taste, the writing is not hurried, and the plot is vivid. Here I will talk about some of the small shortcomings in it, and let everyone have a common progress. 1. It seems that it is too nationalistic ideologically, especially that ethnic minority should not be killed, the greatest advantage of the Chinese nation is to assimilate other ethnic groups, which is to fundamentally eliminate foreign races, which is much stronger than slaughter, of course, I am not opposed to killing all the Japanese. 2. Don't always mention that you have played the game of 3 countries, so that you lose the seriousness of the article. 3. The establishment of religion is too ridiculous, not to mention its rigorous ideological system, it is difficult to discuss the arrangement of the founders alone. Deep sea fascination

□ [Essence] I don't dare to agree with Brother 03 on the water side, the reason why China's scientific and technological development has stagnated and regressed later, is not that Chinese does not attach importance to intelligence, but that in culture, the West is individual-centered, and China is collective-centered, which is cultural. Cultural, scientific and technological progress must be based on social stability, and the center of gravity of ancient Chinese society was, to be honest, on the emperor or the person in power. This is the reason why 'five generations are not prosperous'. This is for social reasons. There are also the traditional Chinese methods of education and the proliferation of the dross in Confucianism in the later period, these are the reasons! Killer Star

□ Questions arise about the new question in chapter 2, verse 12: the protagonist preaches democracy, equality, and freedom, while at the same time protecting his own privileged interests. Describes the reform of etiquette, these are all superficial work, how much does this have to do with solving the people's livelihood? Moreover, etiquette, especially court etiquette, was only developed in the Song Dynasty, where was there a lot of red tape in the Eastern Han Dynasty? The military salute of the Eastern Han Dynasty has been around for a long time. "Yao Shun suffers from being an official, so he gives up his position." In the later period of primitive society, there was no political struggle in the Zen concession system? What is the explanation for Yao's marriage to Empress E and Nuying Yu Shun? The concept of equality is not spoken, nor can it be achieved overnight, it is limited by economic conditions, it is obtained through struggle, and it is too easy for the protagonist to say. Zihua

□ There are also contradictions in the privilege bill, "new homeless people do not have the right to be elected", do Guan Ning, Bing Yuan, Wang Lie and others count as displaced people, should they abide by the law? There is also "militarized management should be carried out according to every 50 households", which is disguised discrimination, why should it be militarized, and how to recruit talents among the displaced people? What is the difference between the aristocracy in the bill and the wealthy clan system in the Eastern Han Dynasty? Even backward, "the great nobles have territories, but they are not allowed to tax the inhabitants of the territories, and the right to collect taxes belongs to the state, but the great nobles have the administrative and judicial powers of the territories, and can appoint the high administrative officials of the territories, the high judicial officials." "What are the benefits for the stability of the country? This is a step backwards in the state system. Who will supervise these nobles? Zihua

□ How to solve the collusion of aristocratic officials with each other? In the era of feudal secession at the end of the Eastern Han Dynasty, I don't see how advanced this bill was under the social structure and economic foundation at that time. It is also an election, a imperial examination, and a privilege of the nobility, how chaotic is the administration and the election of officials? With the slow development of agriculture, the weak industrial base, and the absence of even the conditions for the budding of capitalism, what basis is there for talking about commerce? How do you keep Izumo Castle safe? The most urgent task at the moment is to develop the ripe conditions for the development of agriculture and industry and to promote commercial development, and not to get entangled in political reform, to fall into the inferior, and to draw a tiger into an anti-dog. So far, there is not much commercial content in the whole book, and the title of the book might as well be changed to "Three Republics" or "Three Colonial Countries". Zihua

□ Compared with the imperial examination system, the aristocratic system is a regression, and it is no different from the wealthy clan system of the two Han Dynasty, and even backward. How can the system of decentralization of administrative and judicial powers ensure the normal taxation system of the country? How can we ensure that the country is not divided? It is because of the existence of this aristocracy that Europe has not been able to unify itself. You put the aristocracy, imperial examination, and electoral systems belonging to the different social structures of the three eras into your system at the same time, and you don't know how to operate effectively? I strongly expressed my skepticism. As a matter of fact, there is no sarcasm for the author. Zihua

□ What is good about Japan, we should pay attention to the country, at that time, Japan's agriculture was backward, resources were scarce, and it was divided into many countries, even if it was captured, there was no benefit, when talking about the Three Kingdoms, there was still a lot of land in the country, no one pleaded to do anything, even if it was laid, with the communication and transportation at that time, the colony could not be controlled, just take the first industrial revolution, the Humen Incident, Britain also reacted a year later, the Three Kingdoms, when the colonies rebelled, it would take several years to react, I am afraid that people have already succeeded in pulling the size of the country, not to think big, but to be big tasd

□ Since ancient times, aggression and expansion through war has never been the mainstream ideology of China, and it is basically a defensive policy. First of all, it is necessary to strengthen and stabilize oneself and get along with neighboring countries through the means of cultural transmission, and the military is a deterrent posture that will only be used as a last resort. China's national policy to the outside world is to pursue the principle of "China is at peace and the four provinces are self-serving", and this policy has been fully embodied during the period of China's strength. Since the protagonist knows that "war is a place of death and life for soldiers, and for the country and the nation, it is the way to survive." I don't know how the protagonist can achieve the unity of knowledge and action? Zihua

□ If you want to have a large number of colonial troops, at least have such a huge amount of technology such as cannons, rifles, and warship radios, even if you have the information, I am afraid that it is not easy to fight and defend the country

□ Look at the Tang Dynasty, the principle of "China is at peace, and the four provinces are self-subdued" has been best embodied, hundreds of countries came to the dynasty, and the surrounding countries were basically included in the Tang sphere of influence, and the world cultural exchanges reached unprecedented prosperity in the Tang Dynasty, from which China benefited a lot, and the countries that exchanged with China also benefited a lot. Only when the country is strong and prosperous, it will naturally have enough self-confidence to be eclectic and bloom in science and technology, culture, economy, and politics. Of course, the term "Siyi" now seems to be a bit chauvinistic, not suitable for the current civilized society, and we do not advocate it. Aggression through war will inevitably be resisted by other countries, and the Chinese nation is insubjugable, but this is not the case with other outstanding nations in the world. Don't forget "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Zihua