"Chaoqing" has written 2.4 million words, and the lion summed it up, and the reader's criticism of "Chaoqing" and the lion is the most, two points: first, "water"; Second, "full of legacy".

If you are stuck in your throat, don't vomit or be unhappy, say a few words.

Let's start with "water".

The lion is very confused about this question, because all the chapters that are accused of "water" are precisely the chapters that the lion has put the most effort and effort on, and in fact, on average, the chapters that are accused of "water" take twice or three times as long to write as the other chapters.

Where the lion works hardest, but it is the least flattering?

What's going on?

Looking back, the lion found that the accusation of "water" began when Guan Zhuofan was the governor of Jiangsu, convened his subordinates, and took charge of his own "family background". After that, whenever there is reform and construction, as long as it involves the ins and outs, planning and design, and detailed analysis, there will be accusations of "water", and the more detailed the explanation, the more accusations of "water" will appear.

Roughly understand what's going on.

I understand that most book lovers prefer to watch plots, dialogues, and actions, but "Chaoqing" can't just focus on power struggles, wars, men and women, but also reform, construction, and development - otherwise, why would Guan Zhuofan wear it back?

Guan Zhuofan wore it back, not just for his own glory and wealth, not just for his big head to be happy and happy, and not to make the Chinese shed more blood!

What he wants to do is to "change" and change China -- to turn backwardness into advanced, shame into glory, from an agricultural country to an industrial country, and from an old empire to a great power in the world.

He hoped that in the process of "change", China would be able to pay as little price as possible and the Chinese would suffer as few disasters as possible.

How to "change"? Through power struggles, men and women, and wars, and having gained power, it is time for reform, construction, and development, right?

Some readers will say, change it, but you can't just mention those who "go through the ins and outs, planning and design, and analysis"? When a clever historical novel involves a historical background, shouldn't it be "moisturizing things silently"?

The problem is that Chaoqing is a time-traveling novel, not a traditional historical novel, and most of the "planning and design" in the book is not a "historical background", but a lion's brain hole, which does not exist in real history. If you don't explain the "ins and outs" clearly, these "planning and design" are trees without roots; Without "methodical analysis", readers don't know, do these "planning and design" establish self-consistent internal logic? Is it really feasible?

Guan Zhuofan is not God, he can't put up a golden finger and say, "I want light, so there is light" -- you have to tell me, where did you get this "light"!

As for the "full legacy", the lion can only say that all book lovers who read books seriously will never put such a hat on the lion - everything that should be explained in the book has already been explained, and how can he "draw a doll and draw the wall"?

Those who buckle the lion with the hat of "full legacy" either did not read the book carefully, or did not read "Chaoqing" at all. Or, for some special purpose.

*(To be continued......)