Integrity, as the foundation of the founding of China, is resolutely unshakable, even when there is the most lack of human resources, Wei Minsheng has never thought of relaxing this policy. Pen "Fun" Pavilion www.biquge.info

After the founding of the People's Republic of China, the role of personal credit and social contribution points will only be strengthened, and only by making integrity run through any corner of social affairs and closely related to everyone's interests, everyone will take integrity as the object of their own care.

But integrity is only an important factor affecting the social ecology, but its impact on the whole society is comprehensive.

There is another important factor in a normal society, and that is freedom.

There are different views on the concept of freedom in academics, and there are differences in the understanding of the relationship between the individual and society, and many thinkers have more than 200 definitions of "freedom".

But among his many descriptions, Wei Minsheng argues that the "freedom is the right to do anything harmless to others" in the Declaration of Human Rights is the most appropriate.

Freedom that is unfettered is desired by anyone, but such freedom is impossible to achieve in the process of dealing with others.

A piece of land with a good location, you want it, he also wants, but there is only one piece of land in the same location, and if you give it to you, you can't meet his requirements, and if you meet the freedom to own this land, you can't meet the same freedom as others.

You have the freedom to like someone, but others also have the freedom to like that person, and at the same time the person you like also has the freedom to dislike you.

As long as freedom does not involve others, it is okay to do anything, but once it involves others, all kinds of conflicts will arise, so absolute freedom without any restrictions and prerequisites cannot exist.

Unless you are born into a world where you are alone, then you have the freedom to do anything in this world.

Society is made up of an infinite number of people, so there can be no absolute freedom in society.

But if this society imposes restrictions on individual behavior everywhere, this cannot be done, and that cannot be done, it will suppress the people's sense of innovation.

Once the people of the whole society lose the motivation to innovate, the whole society will become a stagnant pool with no life to speak of.

Only in a society where individual freedom is guaranteed to the greatest extent will the wisdom of the people be unprecedentedly active, innovative things will be constantly proposed, and wealth will naturally gush out like a volcanic eruption as a by-product.

However, how to ensure the maximum protection of individual freedom in a society is simple to say, but it is very difficult to achieve it completely.

The ultimate goal of pursuing freedom is to obtain happiness, because the ultimate pursuit of human beings is happiness, so the fundamental purpose of people's pursuit of freedom must also be to obtain happiness.

Since the premise of freedom does not involve the interests of others, and the interests of others are generally the right to distribute and own social resources, social resources are an important issue that must be assessed in order to obtain freedom.

In the case of a certain amount of social resources, the distribution of resources is inevitably closely related to the happiness of individuals.

Therefore, a society must have a reasonable and acceptable way of allocating resources.

The "artesian post" that Wei Minsheng came up with on the premise is an attempt to make free career choices and allocate resources.

In the case that Wei Minsheng already knows the development process of some things, there is no need to try and make mistakes one by one, at least before the emergence of high-tech industries beyond the real world in Huaxia, there will be no industry leaders.

Because the knowledge of Huaxia comes from the same time and space, the conditions and starting points for all people to learn are the same, but the degree of personal mastery and flexible application is different.

If there really are one or two high-tech industry leaders, then he will be able to obtain income and status far from this industry that far exceeds that of others.

This disparity in income and status, in turn, will spur more people to join the industry, and with the efforts of talented people who are all passionate about their work, they may even get some unexpected gains.

Under this distribution method, anyone in the social group has the freedom to choose any position, but if you are not qualified for the position because of your ability, then it is also the freedom of the entire social group to have someone else get the position.

Only when the whole society adopts the allocation of resources based on this free job selection can it be recognized by all members of society, can people make the best use of their talents and materials, and can a positive working and living atmosphere be formed in the whole society.

In the case of full sharing of information, the so-called experience is no longer an important indicator of a person's ability, but the basic common sense that a person should or can master.

With full freedom of choice for all jobs, so-called qualifications are no longer a means of limiting one's abilities.

Experience and qualifications are really just artificial restrictions imposed by those in power in a state of confusion in the selection of talents, in order to protect the interests of human favors and vested interests.

The setting of a minimum income, although it cannot make everyone happy, can at least allow people to have "freedom from want", and under this minimum living guarantee, people can dare to fight and have no worries.

When all people in society are no longer subject to various restrictions due to experience, qualifications and life, only then will some people dare to think, dare to do, and dare to act, and there will be no vested interest groups, and the so-called unspoken rules will have no soil for survival.

Only when there is full competition in all occupations and positions in society can we talk about openness, fairness, and justice, and can the idealized employment mechanism of "the capable go up and the mediocre go down" can be truly implemented.

Only when everyone can play any role in society, and do not know when they will be a character in a story, will they think about the true meaning of fairness.

It is not fair to look at any issue without taking a stand.