Posted 5 minutes before the update, in order to let everyone understand why Eric always said that equipment is expensive and can't afford it.

Let's talk about the concept of 95 billion marks (63.3+ billion US dollars) by the place, not counting the number of words in the ontology.

The military expenditure of the United States in the historical period was very low during this period, and only maintained the minimum number of troops (200,000 to die, but the Federal Republic of Germany maintained 2 million), and the data I got was about 1.3~3.1% GDP

The UK is much higher than the US, accounting for 9~12%

France 60~70% (you know why)

USSR 11.2~12.8%

The above percentages are all collected data, take the median value, and then give a floating range.

With the above reference, Germany's 9% military spending ratio is not unusual, and even for the proportion of military spending of land power countries and Germany, 9% should be very low. And because of the increase in income, the strength of the second economy (period), 9% of the military spending should be compared with the United States, otherwise it is not bullying people to compare with the United Kingdom? （233）

I laid the groundwork a long time ago, Germany's new military industrial system - countersunk bomb, which itself is a very controversial ammunition system, according to the current design idea (the United States), the division of ammunition from low to high is bottle bullet (traditional ammunition) - countersunk bullet (used by the protagonist) - shellless bullet (in history, Germany was the first to do it, and now the United States has done it, it is difficult). Is it? If anyone who knows a little knows that compared with traditional ammunition, it is naturally stronger than him, but the cost is also much higher, not to mention that the cost of the new military industrial system cannot be lowered at all, so Germany in this period wants to develop a powerful military force overnight, even if it costs 95 billion federal marks, it is impossible to hear the sound of water, but don't worry, Eric has his own clever plan to make the buried bullet practical. Moreover, for the sake of economic considerations, small-caliber ammunition still took the traditional route, due to the fact that the consumption is not small, and the production cost and production technology / output cannot meet the requirements.

Say a few price references (this book),

The Type III tank cost 95,000 marks,

IIIA: 105,000 marks

IIIB: 140,000 marks

IIIC: 142,000 marks

The above are all empty shells that do not carry any weapons, and what weapons you want, you have to spend money to buy them and then spend money to install them, so you can calculate what you can buy with the military expenses that the red deer of the three armies gets. If you buy it, you have to pay for training, and you have to shoot guns, consume fuel, maintain, and repair during training, and these logistics also need to buy equipment, and these logistics equipment also need to be maintained... Do the math...

(A joke, although it's written, but it can't be too broken, it can't be written like a game, buy it and do it directly, don't worry about it when you're done...) ）

The Wehrmacht still has a long way to go before it grows to become a global dominating force, so let's witness it with them! Can't get a subscription! How about a tip? Thanks! (The Wehrmacht said that the manuscript fee of 6 yuan a day is not enough to even smoke money, 2333)