You say that he is to oppose the Qing Dynasty and restore the Ming Dynasty, he usually oppresses the common people. You say that he is loyal to the Qing Dynasty, and he works so hard to suppress the peasants, but when he encounters Britain and France, he can't beat him, and he runs fast.

You ask him why he ran, he is anti-Qing and Mingming, and anti-Manchu and Han. The run was to disintegrate the Qing army and restore the Han dynasty.

The Manchu Qing Dynasty had more than 13 million square kilometers of the country, and the total number of troops, including the Eight Banners garrisoned, was less than 100,000.

All the run, let the master fight and pull it down? Ye didn't run, but if he couldn't fight, he would die on the way to the charge.

The horse team that charged at Baliqiao fell on the way to the charge, not to let people arrest the concentration camp, not to resist and let people be slaughtered like pigs and sheep!

Of the soldiers guarding the Bali Bridge, did one of them retreat and one surrender? The whole army did not retreat a single step, and all the troops died in battle! Shengbao's face and legs were all pierced, and the horses were blown up.

Of the 30,000 troops at Baliqiao, more than half of the casualties were still attacking, and 1,500 were killed on the spot on the way to the charge. During the entire period of the Japanese invasion of China, was there a unit that could still surprise the Japanese army even though it suffered more than half of the casualties?

The Eight Banners just can't be beaten, except for the British and Indian colonial troops and Hua Yong, the serious British soldiers and French soldiers didn't die much, the casualties were only in double digits, and the level was not as good as others, so you have to admit it.

Manmeng's courage is still there, but compared to Britain and France at that time, it is only the courage of the natives. People have entered modern times, and Manmeng is still stuck in ancient times.

The dark Manchu Qing can't afford to die a reactionary Tartar, so they have to leave some live Tartars to cage and rack birds in the capital and walk through the streets and alleys.

Otherwise, the Han people still thought that the Manchurian uncle was dead. If you have a lot of courage, climb over the wall and enter the Forbidden City to see, yo, the Tartars are dead, hey, then the Qing Emperor will abdicate in advance.

The real thing, more than 200 people of the Jiaqing Dynasty Shinrikyo entered the Forbidden City, and directly stared at the later Daoguang Emperor, exchanged fire face to face, and were killed by Mianning with a musket.

The gang occupied the palace for two days, and when they walked around, they couldn't find a few real Tartars, but instead they got lost.

The Forbidden City has actually been empty all the time, the rooms are not filled, many palace rooms only have ornaments and no one, and there are only a few people in the Eight Banners of Manchuria? How can there be kung fu in the palace! As long as the Han Chinese have courage, a few hundred people can capture the enemy's lair.

Sheng Kyoto is empty, there are no 40,000 Manchurian Eight Banners in more than 4 million square kilometers, and I don't dare to let the Han people out of the customs This is it, so let the Han people go over the wall and go in to see, yo, there is no Tartar in the old nest.

The total population of Manchuria was only a few hundred thousand at that time, and there were only tens of thousands of soldiers in the Eight Banners of Manchuria, and 400 million Han people sat and watched, so that the lord could resist by himself? Spell light pull down?

Tartars are not brain-dead, of course, they should rather be foreigners than domestic slaves.

The master's things were robbed by robbers, which is normal, and other robbers rely on the action and strength of licking blood from the knife edge. Didn't the owner's things be snatched like this back then?

But how could the master's slave think that what the robber had stolen should be given to him? If you don't give it back, it's unequal? This mentality, so strange!

If you want it, reach out and take it. Look at the sexy girl, if you want to touch it, you can reach out! The beauties who chatter all day long are not equal, I am not equal, and if you level it, who will stop you?

This kind of guy with a complicated mind really fights, and it is normal for people to herd sheep with a bayonet.

The difference between the modern army and the ancient army is in faith, the belief in "nation-state", "nation-state" is a word, and "one country and one nation" means.

The Americans, the British, the Japanese, the French, all evolved into nation-states in the nineteenth century, that is, into modern times.

It's not like this at the beginning, Japan looks like a Yamato nation, and there were Ezo people, Ryukyuan people, and Taiwanese people earlier, but in the end, they all got along, and they were all Yamato people, and they were all Japanese.

Kemal, the father of Turkey, also preached that "all the people who live on Turkish soil are Turks", what kind of religion, a bunch of nationalities, get out of the way, this is called nationalism.

Kemal wanted to lead Turkey to evolve into a nation-state. However, he failed.

The concepts of "nation", "nationalism", and "nation-state" were born during the French Revolution in Europe and were introduced into the yellow world by Japanese translation.

These words are all Japanese-style words, and a certain country has copied the words, as for the specific meaning? Look at the words and guess, free heart proof.

The original meaning of "nation" was "all the people and the whole race", and the meaning of "nation-state" was "one country and one nation".

Nationalism is the only way to nationalism, just as the preconditions for national mobilization are compulsory education for all and social security for all, which are both purposeful and directive.

The dialectical thought of modern materialism is not something in the clouds, not emotions, mathematics and logic, and the purpose is clear. It is not the same thing as the monolithic idealism of antiquity.

"Be patriotic!" "Why be patriotic?" "Because ......" this is modern.

"Be patriotic!" "Why be patriotic?" "Traitor!" This is the Holy See.

The part about nationalism is completely wrong in a certain country's translation and understanding. Just as a certain country explained how the bourgeoisie in Europe and the United States has been doing for decades, it seems to be very reasonable, but in fact it is a wasted effort.

Because in the reality of Europe and the United States, there has never been such a class as the "bourgeoisie".

The division between the ancient "clan" and the modern "nation" is the same as the French wine classification, which also comes from Napoleon.

Because Napoleon was not French, he was Corsican, an Italian from the French occupation zone, Nurhachi of France.

Nationalism is not in the literal sense, neither to highlight the nation, nor to create internal contradictions between the nations. Rather, it is to turn a bunch of nationalities in the Franks into "one France", which is equivalent to the "Chinese nation" as Liang Qichao understands.

Nationalism is aimed at eliminating nations, internally it is to eliminate multi-ethnic and ancient national divisions, to evolve into militarism, and externally it is also to eliminate and assimilate, and to compete for the position and hegemony of the great powers.

This idea of "one country, one nation" was born in modern times, so such a country is called a modern nation-state.

Many parrots don't understand why China has "traitors" in the past, very simply, because once they evolve into nation-states, there are no more "traitors".

Because at that time, there were no Han people, only Chinese!

The reason why a certain country has not evolved into a nation-state is because the ideological circles are not a problem of backwardness, and they have not made any achievements, even if the theories that have been eliminated abroad are difficult to understand.

As soon as the nation-state was born, its combat effectiveness was overwhelming for all traditional countries except the nation-state. The nation-state is a massacre against the traditional country, the same weapon, the brain is different, and the Saudi Arabia is also an all-American equipment.

Once a nation-state is produced, the feudal military system supported by the samurai class of the Japanese army will be all indigenous, and it will be useless to be fanatical.

Even in the era of the Anglo-French alliance, the Eight Banners of Manchuria still swore to the death, and the Japanese samurai were also fanatical, but it was useless, and they couldn't beat others.

The gap between the nation-state belief and the loyalty and patriotism of the monarch, the integration of Manchu, Mongolia, Manchu and Han, the expulsion of the Tatars, and the restoration of the chaotic fragments of faith in China is too great.

In addition to faith, the biggest difference between the modern army and the ancient army in terms of tactics and training subjects is that the science of experimentation replaces free mind and empiricism.

Mathematics, geometry are fully refined, refined down to individual soldiers, and tactical movements.

A white-edged charge is not a screaming rush with a knife, but a walk in accordance with the prescribed formation and prescribed steps.

A few steps to start jogging, a few steps to start charging, a few steps away from the enemy to step and stab, the position of holding the gun, the movement, the angle of the assassination, there are clear rules.

Before the Japanese army charged with white blades, they would even screw the safety behind the rifle according to the procedure to avoid misfire and penetrating injuries.

The step points are precisely defined, which is the need for synthesis. Because of the coordinated artillery of the rifle artillery, the angle conversion of the crossfire of the two wings is also procedural and cohesive.

If you don't follow the tactical instructions and charge bravely, you will rush into the killing range of your own firepower.

After the regulations become more and more detailed and the connection becomes more and more dense, there will be a barrage Xu Jin tactic. The explosion point of the cannon followed the charging formation of the infantry, and the infantry looked at the explosion point of the cannon in front.

That's not the same thing as the ancient army at all, it's no longer a problem that bravery can make up for, and no matter how brave the natives are, they can't beat the war machine.

That's mathematical, geometric, logical, precise calculations and strict regulations, and the requirements for intelligence gathering, support, surveying and mapping are very high.

What is involved in the latter is the concept of strategy, strategic composition, campaign organization, tactical rehearsal, systematic military thinking and organization and mobilization of combat preparations, systematic teaching and modern logistics system, strategic and tactical intelligence reconnaissance, ideological control, and so on.

The system of the General Staff is the modern logistics system, that is, the Scharnhorst of Prussia, the science of system operation learned from Napoleon's chief of staff Berthiena.

The most sophisticated science of mankind is war. The most cutting-edge technology of mankind is used in war. Civilian science and technology are nothing but by-products of military scientific research.

The war is won or lost, so precise that it can be pushed out on the sand table.

In World War II, the Pacific Theater from beginning to end of all the battle process and sequence, Japan had already launched troops, and knew before the war that it would lose!

Even, at the end of the Ming Dynasty and the beginning of the Qing Dynasty, ten years before Zheng Chenggong's attack on Taiwan, the Dutch governor had already predicted the time of Zheng Chenggong's attack on Taiwan, that is, when he failed on the mainland battlefield. The strategic prediction was carried out, and the preparations for the war were carried out in advance.

Militarism is actually compulsory education, that is, military and national education, that is, strategic preparation, that is, why Napoleon evolved into a "nation-state", that is, in order to evolve into militarism again.

In the industrial age, the most efficient were machines. In fact, an industrial society is an efficient society in which people are cultivated like machines.

If there are no rules, no stick supervision, no mission popularization, the people will line up? There is no standard, there is no traffic police, there will be red lights and green lights, and there will be driving on the right?

The habits of the people of the industrialized countries are not innate, they are established by rules and standards, and cultivated by discipline and sticks.