If it weren't for the fact that the Manchurian nobles were all full of military exploits, and they couldn't look down on Azig who only had military exploits, they really wanted the Council of Parliamentary Kings to agree to the regent of Azig, and Shunzhi's opposition was invalid.

Manchuria was feudal, not a great unification, but a democratic collegial system of military aristocracy, including for Mongolia, and the great unification was only for the Han land.

After all, the Han people are the same as lambs domesticated by Confucianism, benevolence and filial piety, knowledge of etiquette, knowledge of books, and the use of state "pasture" and "benevolence and filial piety" to govern the world, there is no need to discuss with the Han people.

Manchurian, Mongolian, Tibetan and Tibetan tribes are not good, they only believe in scimitars, horses, firecrackers and cannons, only believe in strength, too barbaric, not feudal and difficult to manage.

Li Chengdong, who killed the two emperors of Zhu Ming and the three slaughters of Jiading, was angry and rebelled against the Qing Dynasty because he was not named the governor of Liangguang.

The Han generals are unfairly rewarded, and the anger is so big. For Manchurian braids and Mongolian tartars, what do you say about preserving heavenly principles, destroying people's desires, the old and the old? That's even more.

It wasn't until the Qing Dynasty invented the trick of repairing the temple that a steppe version of the method of fooling the people and the weak people was used to completely rectify the ignorance of the Mongols.

Of course, the final result is that the Eight Banners have also been cultivated and abolished, and no matter how good the internal effect is, it will not be delayed by the foreign British and French forces.

But not now, Mongolia and Manchuria are very elite nowadays.

At this time, the territory of the Mongol tribes was so large that the Ming Dynasty had already turned into a counteroffensive, and the Ming Dynasty had already compressed the territory of the Ming Dynasty to only more than 3 million square kilometers.

Later generations had no concept of these things, just the unequal treaties of the Manchu Qing Dynasty that the gods chattered about, ceding something and something......

Is it the Han land that was ceded? If you don't recognize the integration of Manchu and Han, treat the Manchus as aliens, and treat the land of aliens as your own, do you want to be shameless?

For the Eight Banners, Manchuria is the homeland, the Great Khan of Manchuria is the foundation, and the integration of Manchu and Mongolia is the national policy. The legal system and Taoist system of the Great Khan of Manchuria have nothing to do with the Han land.

It was Manchuria that the Mongols surrendered, not to the Han Chinese. Tibet also surrendered to Manchuria, not to the Han Chinese.

The Emperor of China was only one of the crowns of the Great Khan of Manchuria, just as the British king who was also the Emperor of India in history. India was liberated, and it cannot be said that Britain has belonged to India since ancient times.

Just as the Yuan was only a part of Mongolia, Kublai Khan also called himself the "Lord of China", the Emperor of China, the chairman of the Mongolian group and the president of the Chinese branch.

It is not that the Yuan Dynasty is a dynasty in China, but the Mongolian Muscovite, Damascus, Central Asia, and West Asia have all belonged to China since ancient times.

The world must not be crazy?

It is not wrong to say that Yuan is a dynasty in China, and China is Zhuxia, which has nothing to do with Han or Han.

China was not founded by the Han people, the Xia people, the merchants, the Zhou people, the Qi Chu Yan Han Zhao Wei Qin people have not yet spoken, let alone belong to the Han people in a natural sense.

After the fall of the Han Dynasty, Han people referred to people who lived above the Han land.

Due to the backwardness of Chinese intellectual circles, the Han Chinese were effectively classified as mongrels. Zhuxia's definition of China is one layer, and Confucianism overthrew the hundred schools of Zhuxia Zhuzi.

After modern times, there is a division between ethnicity and racism, and the Han people are Han people in Confucian ethics? What about the significance of blood race? Or is it a cultural definition of modern nationalism?

Race, ethnicity, etc., these are all words translated in Japanese, but due to the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China, a bunch of masters of Chinese studies who were praised to the sky are too high.

There's a tree here, there's a tree there, and it's become a road after walking a lot, oops, it's so well written, this ideological realm is extended, and the meaning is profound, a great writer.

"Mr. De", "Mr. Sai", "Internachonaire", alas, the translation is too good.

The level is too high, and I haven't developed something that the paper can't understand, so I have to look at the explanation of the cited literature, and I directly add mutual guessing to the free mind.

A modern virtue, critics are not right, "narrow nationalism"? Is there still "broad racial discrimination"?

Since there has never been an academic atmosphere, there has been a blank space in the ideological circles, and saying that it is a study of the Western system and ideology is actually a proof of freedom, and it is mixed with national sentiment and political factors, and the result is that all the explanations are wrong.

Some things that introduce the West, what the Chinese think there are, are actually not, such as the "bourgeoisie", which has never existed in Europe and the United States.

But the ideas that Europe and the United States have, once they pass through the Chinese-style free mind, then "monopoly capitalism" becomes "imperialism", then the treaty can still be unequal, anyway, the Chinese are used to free mind, what you say is what it is.

Ethnicity, race, East and West are not one interpretation, only "Chinese" is a native Chinese word.

It's all confusing, and there's no way to explain what the Han people are.

China is China, and Han people are Han people.

It is impossible to say that the Mongols and Han in the Yuan era fused. It is not wrong to say that the Yuan was a dynasty in China. It is absolutely correct to say that the modern Mongolian and Han people are brothers.

It has nothing to do with killing, slaughter or something is the true face of war, and it is your business that you cannot accept it weakly, and it has nothing to do with the nature of war. The sun in the sky will not be moved by the joys and sorrows of the world.

This disintegration refers to the fact that no matter in terms of blood and race, or in terms of culture and ethics, Mongolia in the Yuan period did not integrate with the southerners.

Later generations of Han people regarded the Song as Han people, but in fact, when they were in Mongolia, they were Han people under the rule of Liao Jin, and the Song people called the northerners "Han people", and called themselves "southerners", and did not recognize themselves as Han people.

According to the instinctive view of the Han people in later generations, the southerners of the Song Dynasty were Han people, and the Han people under the rule of Liao Jin in the north must also be Han people, right? Then they are all Han people, anyway, that's how Han people came.

Liaojin was recovered by the Han people, plus the territory of the Southern Song Dynasty, which was also recovered by the Han people.

The Great Khan of Mongolia is the emperor of China and the ruler of China, but China is only one of the places ruled by the Great Khan of Mongolia, and the Han people are just one of the countless conquering and ruling peoples of Mongolia, how can the master be integrated with the slaves?

Mongolia has never given the power of the lord of China to be the lord of Mongolia. On the contrary, it was the lord of Mongolia who also served as the lord of China.

Han was only one of the lands conquered and ruled by the Mongols, not the mainland.

At the end of the Yuan Dynasty, he was beaten away, and he just lost a piece of land, and it was the Yuan of China's legal system that was destroyed by the Ming Dynasty, and it was a crown that knocked out Mongolia, but it did not destroy Mongolia.

On the contrary, the Mongols were about to extinguish the Ming Dynasty again.

When the Ming Dynasty drove Emperor Yuan out of the Han land, the Han land was still big in Mongolia, Damascus, Moscow, Central Asia, West Asia, Arabia, India, all still occupied it, and then counterattacked back to the Han land, and captured the Ming emperor alive.

The Ming pushed the Yuan back beyond the Great Wall, expelled the Tartars, and recovered China.

But Mongolia has a lot of khanates to the north, west, and south.

When Emperor Yuan jumped north, the lame Timur in the west was still beating Europe, the whip of God, Hongwu had just conquered Turkey and Asia Minor.

Yunnan was taken over by the Ming army from the Mongols, but the Indian states further south were still Mongol.

To the west, Tibet belonged to the Mongol and Shute Khanates, and to the west, the entire five Central Asian states, namely the White Horde, West Asia, and Bulgaria and Turkey, were all Mongol khanates.

The northern Vaspurs, the Tatars, and the farther Golden Horde were all Mongol, and Moscow was Mongol.

Mongolia was pushed back in the middle of the Ming Dynasty, before the Zhengde year, and the territory of the Ming Dynasty continued to shrink.

The southwest Chengdu west was lost, the northwest Hamiwei was lost, and half of the Hetao was gone, and Lin Dan Khan was mixed in the Hetao.

The Datong city wall is the front line, and the Mongolian soldiers have reached the hinterland of Shanxi.

The Nuer Gansi in the Northeast was only at the beginning of the Ming Dynasty, and it disappeared after only 20 years. The Hamiwei in the west were all lost before the Zhengde year and retreated to Jiayu Pass. After Ming Yingzong was captured in the north of the civil fort, he reached Shaanxi in the west and Shanxi in the north, which is the nine sides of the Ming Dynasty.

At first, they were surrounded by the Mongols from time to time, and then the pigtailed soldiers came to rob them from time to time.

The strategic direction of Manchuria was not Guannai at all, and it had been unifying the Jianzhou tribes, and then the entire Shengjing region, the Mongol khanates.

The strategic direction of the Manchurian Eight Banners' external expansion was Mongolia, and in addition to Mongolia, it was also Mongolia.

The real opponent of Manchuria was the Mongols, not the Han Chinese.

After Ming Yingzong was captured, even the attack and defense of the north changed hands. Tumubao is in Zhangjiakou, Hebei, at the gate of Handi, not in the hinterland of Mongolia.

The Ming Jing Division has become the front line, and there is no power to fight back against Mongolia.

China's suzerainty over Mongolia was granted by the Manchurians, and had nothing to do with the Han Chinese, but came from the Manchus and Mongolians as a whole.

What a heroic people are the Mongols? I have never served the Han Chinese.

When the Mongols rose, the glory of the Han Dynasty had long since passed, and it was all BC. The Han people and the Han Dynasty are not the same thing, the Han people are called Liao, the people under the rule of Jin.

In the memory of Mongolia, the Han people were the third-class people who were ruled by the Liao and Jin, and the Song were the fourth-class southerners, when did the Han people conquer Mongolia?

It was the Manchurian Eight Banners that really subdued Mongolia, and the jade seal of the Yuan Dynasty was handed over to Dolgon.

The Great Khan of Manchuria was the Great Khan of Mongolia first, and the Emperor of China second.

Whoever overthrew the Qing Dynasty and wanted to inherit Manchuria, Mongolia, Xinjiang, Tibet, Huibu, and Han at the same time, he must inherit the Qing Taoism and legal system.

Otherwise, the puzzle will be shattered to the ground and will never be left again.

Kangxi is the emperor, there are Manchu, Han, Mongolian and Tibetan masters, Manchuria entered China, to rule many more Han people than Manchurians, it is called a small army to a big country, the national question and the method of ruling must be considered, is the top priority.

Originally, Master Han taught him the truth that he wanted to promote Confucianism throughout the Qing Dynasty, and he felt that it was very reasonable.

It was only when the Chinese got Confucian cancer that they became Han Chinese. The gentleman originally wore a sword, and shooting a bow horse was a basic skill. If you want a gentleman to wear a fan, you have no power to tie the chicken, if you want to make a gentleman become a hypocrite, if you want to let the Han people continue to be terminally ill, Confucianism is indispensable.

It is necessary to teach the Han people to be filial to their parents, to be filial to their parents, to be there for their parents, not to travel far, to respect the old and to love the young, to respect the old and love the young, to be the ruler and the minister, to be the father and son, and to be benevolent, righteous and moral.

The Son of Heaven is heroic, and the article teaches Ercao. Everything is inferior, but reading is high.

Let the Han people read more, just do it.