Yuanji even the Gregorian calendar, that is, the Gregorian calendar, has not yet been converted.

He is not even as familiar with the lunar calendar as the maids in the house!

What "the sunset in the northwest is full of red, either the rain comes or the wind", what "a thunder in the summer, the yellow plum turns upside down", what "the chimney does not smoke, it must be a rainy day", what "the head is a flower, two is a bean, and three is a red bean" and so on. The maid and servant in the house came as soon as they opened their mouths, and a person-shaped weather forecast was the same.

Yuan Ji can't do it, he only knows May Day, Children's Day, February 14 Valentine's Day, November 4 Week 4 Thanksgiving, December 25 Christmas, the lunar calendar knows a fart, which day of the Spring Festival, he has to check the calendar,

Yuan Ji felt that he was more like a foreign devil than Nan Huairen, who was dressed in a horse coat, shaved braids, and skillfully played thousands of tricks for him.

If he wants to say that he is not Yidi, I am afraid that Confucius will not agree.

On the contrary, it is said that Nan Huairen is Chinese, and Confucius must agree, and if Yi Di enters China, then China will be!

Nan Huairen is a Catholic, and the Catholic Inquisition burned Copernicus to death more than a hundred years ago.

But Yuanji saw that on the booklet he handed over, the orbit of the solar system was already a geodynamic map, that is, the center of the sun. Catholicism is revisionist, what can he say? Say there's actually Uranus, Neptune, Pluto out there?

Without observations, how can the argument be supported? How can I observe without observation equipment? Without lens technology, where would the observation equipment come from? Without long-term real-time data tracking and systematic proofreading analysis, where is the argument?

Modern astronomy has been in place since Galileo Galilei pointed his telescope into space during the Wanli period of the Ming Dynasty, and Europe is rapidly catching up with China and the Arab civilization in the field of astronomical observation.

Three years later, the Greenwich Observatory in London will be established by King Charles II of England, and the anchor point of longitude "0" in latitude and longitude will be officially wedged, and the transoceanic direct navigation chart will be born.

As a result, the era of great colonial plunder, which is divided by a grid and drawn by latitude and longitude on the map, dividing colonies and spheres of influence, is about to begin!

Edmund, who is two years younger than Kangxi. Thirteen years later, Halley would go to Trinity College in Cambridge to find Newton with doubts about the physical operation of comets and other astrophysics, so that Newton spent two weeks classifying his previous lectures on optics, arithmetic, and algebra into the book "Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy".

As soon as Principia came out, Newtonian mechanics officially appeared, paving the theoretical path for the development of European science, and the Industrial Revolution was born in it......

The East and West are not civilizational differences, and the Chinese of the Ming and Qing dynasties, including the Arabs of the Ottoman region, lived much richer than the Europeans.

It is the differences in experimental sciences represented by mathematics, geometry, chemistry, and physics that have created the rapid overtaking of Europe.

As soon as the Renaissance came, the ideological confinement and sensitive atmosphere imposed by the Holy See on the Catholic world were broken, and as soon as the environment was relaxed, it had the power to speak scientifically.

"I don't agree with you, but I defend your right to speak to the death."

Render to God what was God's, and to Caesar what is Caesar's, and secular power and religious power have been divided.

But both religious and secular power control the interpretation of philosophy and natural science.

The Renaissance was the separation of philosophy and natural science from secular and religious power.

The secular kingship of Europe was only a systematic method of philosophical and experimental science that redeveloped a set of social sciences. But the fields of philosophy and natural sciences have been completely liberalized and supported.

However, in the Chinese civilization ruled by Confucianism and the Arab civilization ruled by Islam, secular power and religious power have always monopolized the interpretation of philosophy, natural sciences and social sciences.

Europe, where religion and secular are dual, has begun to split into a third element of scientific cognition, and the discovery and interpretation of knowledge is no longer monopolized by royal power and religious power.

The Arab civilization and the Chinese civilization have always been a dualistic structure.

The result of the collision between the two sides in the original history was not caused by the emphasis on agriculture and the suppression of business, or the emphasis on commerce rather than business.

The failure of the East is the result of the binary monopoly of secular power and religious power, and the structural problem is here.

Confucianism has to guide everything, governance methods, ideology and philosophy, what to compete with the people for profit, train bad feng shui, new cultural movement, traditional Chinese medicine, Chinese, everything wants to participate, everything hinders it, everything can be classified as unkindness, disloyalty and filial piety, traitor and ......

With the earlier unbelief in God will burn you, with the Yijiao has always let women cover their faces, a virtue.

In fact, whether it is the ruling structure of the initial political system, the system of great unification, military science, Chinese characters, traditional Chinese medicine, etc., including the system of New China, which one came from the Soviets, which one was carried out by Confucianism?

All Chinese ethics, including idioms, came from the Spring and Autumn Period, and even the most important financial systems in ancient China: the monopoly of salt and iron, and the monopoly system of the mountain and the sea, were all invented by Guan Zhong, what does it have to do with Confucianism? The words of the scholar and the doctor are all stolen!

I haven't beaten down the world once, and every time I sit in the world, I feel that I have created everything and can control everything, and half of the "Analects" can cure the world, isn't this a neurosis?

The old and the old, the father and the son, the filial piety, the benevolence and filial piety, and even the monarch and the minister, the father and the son can be said to be good, but this is the code of ethics, it is a religion, and the code of ethics is often destroyed, and you can stretch out your hand.

As for the country's political manufacturing, financial system, military system, how to fight wars, how to cross trains, as soon as this Confucian stretched out his hand, he crossed the line.

Secular power is domination, religious power is ethics, once the line is crossed, it is the concept of centralization and religious development, and the modern logical thought and systematic experimental science bred by dialectical materialism cannot breathe.

What is Modern Logic and Experimental Science? It's something that can be tried repeatedly!

This system has been successful in the United Kingdom, and it must be transplanted to Singapore, Canada, Australia, etc., wherever it is transplanted.

Using this process and step, which substance is extracted and synthesized. According to your test data, people can restore the paper step by step, and they must also be able to make the same substances and synthetics through repeated tests.

Otherwise, it is a proof of freedom, a religion, and ethics and morality, but it has nothing to do with modern thought.

For example, "if you are a threesome, you must have my teacher", "Ci is not in charge of the army, and righteousness is not good", "Shengmien, fighting Mi hatred" and so on, this is nonsense in dialectics, it is religion.

You can't prove it, there are many handsome and righteous businessmen!

"God said there should be light, so Athena stripped naked", "He who wins the hearts of the people wins the world", etc., these are all assumptions of missionary and free heart.

The Mongols don't need to win the hearts of the people, just don't accept the slaughter, the world is the largest in human history.

European military science is also evolving to science, geometry and mathematics are more and more systematically introduced into the level of campaign and tactics, and the concept of military strategy is increasingly integrated into dialectics.

Although there are still idealistic nonsense such as Clausewitz's "On War" and "war is the continuation of politics," they have generally broken away from ignorance and moved toward an increasingly logical system of modern military thought.

What is ignorance? Is it right to "love soldiers like children"? Or is it right that "mercy does not lead the army"? Is "strict military discipline" right? Or is it true that "Tarzan collapses in front of it and its color does not change"?

This is foolishness!

In the military, only winning is right!

As soon as the war starts, it is only about life and death, life and death are established, and only reincarnation.

Criticizing the slaughterer as an unjust force, that is, a force that will be slaughtered again and again, arming one's own waste with ignorant thoughts, it is impossible not to be slaughtered, that is unscientific!

The victor is not to be blamed!

If you condemn the victors, there will be no soil for the victors to be born inside, and it is your own side that restricts and suppresses, what binds your own minds, hands and feet, and what unloads your own arms.

You are weak and you can't bear to hurt others. Don't you allow others to improve themselves and hurt you?

If a weak army will not be slaughtered, why should it be strong? If a weak country cannot be destroyed, why should it be strong? It's not to urge the city to destroy the country, reward millions of heads to the ground, and look for a marquis for thousands of miles, so why bother to make military books and practice martial arts diligently?

The book of war explores the art of war. Martial arts, the study of murder is the study of killing.

If you don't love war and killing, you won't be able to learn it at all, and you won't be able to master the art of killing.

When you meet someone who has mastered this science, you can only use the accumulated white bones to create a famous martial arts for others.

Strong army, strong country, individual training, that is very painful. The hard work of building a butcher's knife is not for the sake of putting down the knife and shaving a bald scoop to recite Amitabha, that is, to slaughter the city and destroy the country!

The only thing that can be proven by being slaughtered is a weak people, a weak army, a weak country, an unknown general, and that's it!

To pity such an inferior nation, inferior country, and inferior culture is to hinder one's own progress.

Pity these, how can the pirates of Britain, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and other countries be embarrassed to go out?

It is right to conquer and slaughter such inferior peoples, inferior countries. It is not only to prove that God blesses the king and show the glory of the soldiers, but also to transform these inferior races, inferior nations, inferior countries and inferior cultures.

In order to one day, let the natives bathe in the blessings of our Lord.

If there is no such belief support and public opinion atmosphere, if there is no corresponding social respect and class treatment, if there is no pirate executioner in our country as a hero.

The pirate who killed an individual was killed by the court of his own country, and his children and grandchildren felt ashamed, and they were despised by their neighbors and couldn't hold their heads up, would they engage in piracy again?

The soldiers will be ashamed to go out to grab a chicken, and they will be tortured by morality, so don't go out, if you can't get out, you can only defend the land and wait to resist bullying.

This kind of reactionary thinking is not necessarily correct with reactionary logic, but at this time Europe is discussing and encouraging a hundred schools of thought to contend.

If it weren't for this relaxed atmosphere, Spain's bloody executioners, who were eager to kill all the South American Indians, would have been wiped out by the righteous people in their own country.

Public opinion is not loosened, society does not agree, Columbus, da Gama, Magellan's gang of pirates, how dare they let go and kill?

If you don't let go, how can you get a civilized Europe.