Chapter subheading: winter-is-coming......

The book "Socialism" is divided into five volumes, in fact, Yuan Yanqian has only copied the first volume now. Pen | fun | pavilion www. ｂｉｑｕｇｅ。 infoIt's not that he doesn't type fast enough, it's that the content in it is too reactionary, and he, a party activist who has received education in dragon slaying in the Celestial Empire, is a little overwhelmed and has to be slightly modified.

For example, the first volume that He Lian and Xu Zhimo have just finished reading is a comparative comparison of the situation of a socialist society with a society organized according to the principles of classical liberalism.

The first part of the first volume is fine, such as exaggerating the superiority of the capitalist system and criticizing the limitations of democracy, which are the daily life of liberals.

IN FACT, THESE CONTENTS ARE REACTIONARY ENOUGH FOR YUAN YANRAN, WHO HAS "ONE RED HEART, TWO PREPARATIONS", BUT HE REALLY CAN'T HOLD THE CONTENT OF "FAMILY POLITICAL ECONOMY" AT THE END OF THE FIRST VOLUME.

How reactionary was Professor Mises? The following is an excerpt from the original text:

"The sexual/arousal state is the most important state in a woman's entire life, and women are always subordinate to *** to a considerable extent. The woman is completely immersed in her sexuality/activity, immersed in the full range of *** activity and reproductive activity. That is, in her relationship with her husband, children. Her life revolves entirely around these things, and on the contrary, men are not just about sex......"

"So, ** is full of women***, and men will be interested in other things. For example, fighting and playing, socializing and feasting, debate and science, business and politics, religion and art, ......"

"Women's lives are nothing but ***. And the life of a man is **plus other affairs. ”

"A woman with great talent, even if she is a mother, can still make small successes. But because women face the primary requirements of gender functioning, genius and great careers are out of her hands. ”

When it comes to Yuan Hong's gradual "political correctness is greater than the sky, women turn over and overwhelm men." Which Western scholar dares to say that feminists will come directly to his door every minute to smash his dog's head to pieces, and he will step on 10,000 feet so that he will never be able to turn over. However, if he has thick hair on his face......

"Pickup pickup."

"Ahem, ahem."

In short, Mises, the old man's straight man's cancer, is hopeless, and he is waiting for extubation at the end of his brain and heart. After his old man went into exile in the United States during World War II, even as a first-class Jew, he still couldn't get rid of Keynesianism in American academic circles, and the thriving civil rights movement could not tolerate such antiques, stubborn and old reactionaries.

Yuan Yanqian knew that there was nothing wrong with saying this in the United States in 1920, but when she thought that she would definitely have to return to China. What if it gets to the country and gets known to the feminists......

Wait, could it be that the feminists in a semi-colonial and semi-feudal society like China in the 20s were more powerful than the United States, which was the stronghold of the white left in later generations?

Unfortunately, that's still the case. Because at this moment, China is a big era in which the old and the new are mixed and the fish and dragons are mixed and the revolution will die, and the United States is still enjoying the glory brought by the First World War, which means that the Chinese radicals are more radical than the American radicals, and the Chinese conservatives are definitely more conservative than the American conservatives...... Not necessarily, but don't forget that there is also a group of fellow Professors Chandler's fellow villagers, the Amish, in the southern part of Capstone State. They kept it so conservative that they didn't use electrical appliances into the 21st century, and it became a tourist attraction.

These filthy statements that "**** is the shortest path to a woman's heart" must not be used, so Yuan Yanqian had no choice but to modify it himself with the consent of the master ball system, and in desperation, he went to another reactionary path...... This path may be a little more reactionary than Mises.

All leftist doctrines and left-wing ideas, whether scientific socialism, or more left-anarchianism, or far-right Fabianism (progressive socialism), are based on fairness. That is to say, there is only a difference in the division of labor, and there is no distinction between the high and the low. In fact, the pluralism of the white left also emphasizes fairness, but they abandon class theory and embrace values, so there are only differences in race, religion, gender and sexual orientation, and there is no distinction between high and low civilization.

Since all people are declared equal, then the status of men and women is naturally equal, and the rights and obligations of them and them are of course equal.

The problem arises, according to the materialist point of view, no matter how wonderful the theory is, it cannot overcome the harsh reality. Differences in the physiological structure and function of men and women inevitably lead to inequality. Especially when it comes to having a baby, men only need to tremble...... Well, even if it is better than the average time of one hour claimed by male netizens, women need a relatively long and extremely torturous pregnancy and lactation period, not to mention the highest pain level index and natural childbirth with half a foot in the door.

At the same time, socialism believes that marriage is a backward institution under private ownership, that it is better not to even get married, and that men and women (well, more precisely with human beings) should live together for the sake of love and only for the sake of love, because this is moral!

In fact, the above content is the point of view in Uncle En's famous "The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State", Uncle En himself has never married, but has lived with a pair of Irish sisters "successively". However, because of "historical limitations", he expressed strong anti-homogeneity in his letter to Uncle Ma, believing that this was an "anti-natural" thing.

And the left has been growing so much that it has become more and more radical on the issue of women and sexual minorities. So there is a very wonderful thing in history that subverts the three views of ordinary people, Soviet Russia is a country with a Christian background in Western civilization, to be precise, the first regime in modern times to decriminalize same-sex sexual behavior!

I have to say that the Red Left is really the ancestor of the White Left, but the little hearts of the little bourgeois of the White Left cannot accept the theory of class struggle.

In this way, socialism has only one option left, and that is to give the right to reproduce back to women. The logic is very simple, since it is so unfair to women, let them choose for themselves, which is called admitting gambling and losing.

Of course, Yuan Yanqian is talking about socialism in the 20s, and he will not and dare not describe the history that followed. In fact, there was an even more extreme approach that followed, and that was the government's control of reproductive rights......

And according to Master Yuan's "inference", even in a capitalist society, with the deepening of industrialization, women will get more and more economic freedom, which is equivalent to correcting most of their reproductive rights in disguise.

Whether it is capitalism or socialism, the irreversible and rapid decline in the fertility rate of industrialized countries is the basis of his critique of the "Political Economy of the Socialist Family".

Dr. Yuan had already revealed his deep understanding of human economic activity and his keen intuition about the laws of economic operation in his first book of economics, "socialism", at the age of 26, when he was a student at New York University, and he had never participated in practical economic work before writing this great book. As the long night of Keynesianism and totalitarianism fell, he was like the last streetlight before the cliff, dutifully trying to show his contemporaries the danger, as he puts it in his book: winter-is-coming......